similar to: stringdot

Hi, A. In a nutshell: The training error, obtained as "error (ret)", from the return value of a ksvm () call for a eps-svr model is (likely) being computed wrongly. "nu-svr" and "eps-bsvr" suffer from this as well. I am attaching three files: (1) ksvm.R from the the kernlab package, un-edited, (2) ksvm_eps-svr.txt: (for easier reading) containing only eps-svr

Hi useR's, I am resending this request since I got no response for my last post and I am new to the list so pardon me if I am violating the protocol. I am trying to use the "Kernlab" package for training and prediction using SVM's. I am getting the following error when I am trying to use the predict function: > predictSvm = predict(modelforSVM, testSeq); Error in

Hello useRs! So, I have a random question. I'm trying to build a character string, then evaluate it. I think an example would be the easiest way to explain: kern.vec = c("rbfdot","polydot") for( j in 1:length( kern.vec ) ) { formula = paste("ksvm( ind ~ . , data=d.temp[,c(ind_col,dep_cols)], kernel =",kern.vec[j],", prob.model=T

Hi everybody, I''m using R on a 64-bit Ubuntu 9.04 (Jaunty). I prefer to install R packages from source, even if they are available in Synaptic. The problem is that I can''t install/compile kernlab. Everything works fine until it gets to the lazy loading part: ** preparing package for lazy loading Creating a new generic function for "terms" in "kernlab"

hi, I am using R's "kernlab" package, exactly i am doing classification using ksvm(.) and predict.ksvm(.).I want use of custom kernel. I am getting some error. # Following R code works (with promotergene dataset): library("kernlab") s <- function(x, y) { sum((x*y)^1.25) } class(s) <- "kernel" data("promotergene") gene <- ksvm(Class ~ .,

I've created an SVM in R using the kernlab package, however it's running incredibly slow (20,000 predictions takes ~45 seconds on win64 R distribution). CPU is running at 25% and RAM utilization is a mere 17% ... it's not a hardware bottleneck. Similar calculations using data mining algorithms in SQL Server analysis services run about 40x faster. Through trial and error, we

Dear all, I am using kernlab package in R, and I have amino acid sequences with different lenghts as input for a SVM and I need to go through this sequences using windows (sliding or fixed) of size X. Does anyone has any suggestions about which function I should use? I thought I could use stringdot, but I am not sure whether it will do what I need.., I have defined my stringdot as: mystringdot

HI I am new to R. I have one problem in the predict function of the kernlab. I want to use ksvm and predict with kernelmatrix (S4 method for signature 'kernelMatrix') #executing the following sentences library(kernlab) # identity kernel k <- function(x,y) { n<-length(x) cont<-0 for(i in 1:n){ if(x[i]==y[i]){ cont<-cont+1 } } cont } class(k) <-

Hi, I have a process using svm from the e1071 library. it works. I want to try using the KSVM library instead. The same data used wiht e1071 gives me an error with KSVM. My data is a data.frame. sample code: svm_formula <- formula(y ~ a + B + C) svm_model <- ksvm(formula, data=train_data, type="C-svc", kernel="rbfdot", C=1) I get the following error:

Hi! The kernlab function kpca() mentions that new observations can be transformed by using predict. Theres also an example in the documentation, but as you can see i am getting an error there (As i do with my own data). I'm not sure whats wrong at the moment. I haven't any predict functions written by myself in the workspace either. I've tested it with using the matrix version and the

Dear list, I am using the ksvm function from kernlab as follows: (1) learning > svm.pol4 <- ksvm(class.labs ~ ., data = train.data, prob.model = T, scale = T, kernel = "polydot") (2) prediction > svm.pol.prd4 <- predict(svm.pol4, train.data, type = "probabilities")[,2] But unfortunately, when calling the prediction, once in every 10s of times (using the exact

with pred.pca<-predict(splits[[i]]$pca,trainingData at samples)[,1:nPCs] dframe<-as.data.frame(cbind(pred.pca,class=isExplosive(trainingData,2))); results[[i]]$classifier<-ksvm(class~.,data=dframe,scaled=T,kernel="polydot",type="C-svc", C=C,kpar=list(degree=degree,scale=scale,offset=offset),prob.model=T) and a degree of 5 i get an error of 0 reported by the ksvm

Hi, For another trainingset I get this error message, which again is rather cryptic to me: Setting default kernel parameters Error in array(0, c(n, p)) : 'dim' specifies too large an array RMate stopped at line 0 of selection Calls: rvm ... .local -> backsolve -> as.matrix -> chol -> diag -> array thanks for any suggestions!

Hi Abbas, Before I try to give you answers, I just want to mention that you should send R related reqests to the R-help list, and not me personally because (i) there's a greater likelihood that it will get answered in a timely manner, and (ii) people who might have a similar problem down the road might benefit from any answer via searching the list archives ... anyway: On Sep 5, 2009, at

Hi, I am trying to construct a svmpoly model using the "caret" package (please see code below). Using the same data, without changing any setting, I am just changing the seed value. Sometimes it constructs the model successfully, and sometimes I get an ?Error in indexes[[j]] : subscript out of bounds?. For example when I set seed to 357 following code produced result only for 8

*Hello All,* I tried figuring out the problem, I was trying to use laplacedot to predict the long term, which however would not do a good job. Then, I tried to do a point by point prediction and building the model again, everytime. It shows me better results. I tried writing my kernel function (matern covariance function), and attached is the result of that. Red lines show the fit and blue lines

I'm using caret to assess classifier performance (and it's great!). However, I've found that my results differ between R2.* and R3.* - reported accuracies are reduced dramatically. I suspect that a code change to kernlab ksvm may be responsible (see version 5.16-24 here: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/caret/news.html). I get very different results between caret_5.15-61 +

I've been trying to get some linear classifiers (LiblineaR, kernlab, e1071) to work with a sparse matrix of feature data. In the case of LiblineaR and kernlab, it seems I have to coerce my data into a dense matrix in order to train a model. I've done a number of searches, read through the manuals and vignettes, but I can't seem to see how to use either of these packages with sparse

Dear all , May you inform me how to use the function of gapweightkernel() from stringkernel Library . where the library is not for R 3.1.1 . I am using R 3.1.1 . sincerely [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I'm trying to using ksvm() in the kernlab package to fit a one-class SVC, but I get a strage result on the cross-validation error estimate. For example, consider this code: data(spam) classifier <- ksvm(type~.,data=spam[which(spam[,'type']=='spam'),], type="one-svc",kernel="rbfdot",kpar=list(sigma=0.1),nu=0.05,cross=10) what I get is: >