similar to: calling a C function with a struct

I ran into a problem with titles on graphs. I wanted a graph with multiple subplots, with each having a title that involved both a Greek letter and an identifier for each graph. Below is a simplified version of code to do this. The graph appears fine, with the first graph having "i=1" in the title, and the second graph having "i=2" in the title. However, when I resize the

There is a contradiction between what the help page says and what constrOptim actually does with the constraints. The issue is what happens on the boundary. The help page says The feasible region is defined by ?ui %*% theta - ci >= 0?, but the R code for constrOptim reads if (any(ui %*% theta - ci <= 0)) stop("initial value not feasible") The following example

I have developed an R package that works under Win32, but when I attempt to build it on Win64, I get ERROR: loading failed for 'x64' More precisely, I developed and tested the package under Win32 and it works. But when I move to a 64 bit Windows 7 (Home Premium) system, and attempt to build both 32 bit and 64 bit packages, the 32 bit package seems to build, but the 64 bit build

Hi, I have this small test case- %struct1 = type { i32, i32 } @glob_const = internal constant [4 x %struct1] [%struct1 { i32 4, i32 5 }, %struct1 { i32 8, i32 9 }, %struct1 { i32 16, i32 0 }, %struct1 { i32 32, i32 10 }], align 16 define void @foo() { entry: br label %loop loop: ; preds = %loop, %entry %iv = phi %struct1* [ getelementptr

Thanks for the suggestion but datalayout info did not solve the problem! -Pankaj -----Original Message----- From: Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 5:26 PM To: Chawla, Pankaj <pankaj.chawla at intel.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] missing simplification in ScalarEvolution? Try adding a datalayout with pointer size

Hi Sanjoy, Thanks for the reply! Your approach sounds good to me! I think 1) is legal as address wraparound in unsigned range doesn't make sense given a positive offset, but I am not sure. I think umax will not be added if we can prove the predicate as known. I am not sure whether umax will get simplified if we add nuw to the expressions. -Pankaj -----Original Message----- From: Sanjoy

On May 22, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Louis Gerbarg <lgg at apple.com> wrote: > The problem that the above transform is technically illegal because “When indexing into a (optionally packed) structure, only i32 integer constants are allowed (when using a vector of indices they must all be the same

Dear R-devel, I am converting some stand-alone programs (mixed C and F77) to R functions. I've run into two issues that I haven't been able to resolve. I've looked at the R-exts manual and Readme files, but haven't found answers. (1) Can I link to a (Win32) static library? Is there some option to RCMD SHLIB that allows this? I've tried RCMD SHLIB myprog.c -l

Hello,   Could someone help me please and to tell how to get the probability from empirical distribution (not parametric) for each data value (R function). For example, for normal distribution there is such a function like:   “pnorm(q, mean = 0, sd = 1, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)”   I need the same function only for the empirical distribution (which does not correspond to any typical

Hello,   Could someone help me please and to tell how to get the probability from empirical distribution (not parametric) for each data value (R function). For example, for normal distribution there is such a function like:   “pnorm(q, mean = 0, sd = 1, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE)”   I need the same function only for the empirical distribution (which does not correspond to any typical

If we do add an argument to get(), then it should be named consistently with the ifnotfound argument of mget(). As mentioned, the possibility of a NULL value is problematic. One solution is a sentinel value that indicates an unbound value (like R_UnboundValue). But another idea (and one pretty similar to John's) is to follow the SYMSXP design at the C level, where there is a structure that

Ben Bolker gives some reasons why Numerical Recipes may be problematic as a starting point for R codes. CUP did a masterful job of marketing, but the license is restrictive as the links he gives points out. In some tests, I've also noted that some of the algorithms are less than stellar e.g, convergence tests in one or two optimization routines. Should we have a wiki item to help people find

Thks for your answer, here is an exemple of what i do with the errors in french... > tmp [1] 200 150 245 125 134 345 320 450 678 > beta18 Erreur : Objet "beta18" not found //NORMAL just to show it > eta [1] 500 > func1<-function(beta18) dweibull(tmp[1],beta18,eta) > func1<-func1(beta18) * function(beta18) dweibull(tmp[2],beta18,eta) Erreur dans dweibull(tmp[1],

Hi, I have a naive question on how to generate LLVM IR for inline functions. I have compiled this C code: *inline void func1()* * {* * int x=3;* * }* * void func2()* * {* * func1();* * int y = 4;* * }* into LLVM IR, using clang -emit-llvm -S -c <filename> But the generated LLVM IR file does *not* have func1() expanded (see below for the relevant parts). *; Function Attrs: nounwind

I am having problems JIT'ing 2 functions where one of them calls the other. (I am using the old JIT interface). Here is the setup: define void @func1() { entrypoint: call void @func2(void) ret void } define void @func2(void) { entrypoint: ret void } (I omit the arguments and function bodies for simplicity.) It's 'func1' that would be called from host code,

Hello guys, I would like to ask for help to understand what is going on in "func2". My plan is to generalize "func1", so that are expected same results in "func2" as in "func1". Executing "func1" returns... 0.25 with absolute error < 8.4e-05 But for "func2" I get... Error in dpois(1, 0.1, 23.3065168689948, 0.000429064542600244,

Hi, I am searching for a way to solve the following problem: I want to use an external function, defined in a dyn.load()ed shared object, in another dyn.load()ed shared object. Currently I have to take the sources (Fortran) from one libraries src/ directory and copy them into the src/ dir of the other library, resulting in two copies of this function. This is bad for maintanance and maybe also

Well, I'm getting a warning (not an error) when the package doesn't exist. I interpreted "most often" to mean that suppressing warnings/errors is why you'd most often use this argument, as most packages don't emit startup messages. And technically there isn't a problem with attaching the package, since we don't even try to attach packages that don't exist.

Hi, all. My question is about how to split one module into N modules(N >= 2)? For example, given the following code: #src.c# int main() { //......// func1(); func2(); //......// return 0; } void func1() { //......// } void func2() { //......// } func1() has no dependence with func2(), so they can perform parallel execution. And I have to split src.c into src1.c

My question is a seemingly simple one. I have a bunch of user-defined functions which compute such-and-such objects. I want to be able to define a variable in a particular function, then make use of it later, perhaps in a different function, without necessarily having to move it around in argument lists. In the C community, it would be called a "global" variable. Question 1: Is this