similar to: Use of survreg.distributions

Dear R-user: After the fitting the Tobit model using zelig, if I use the following command then I can get the regression coefficents: beta=coefficients(il6.out) > beta (Intercept) apache 4.7826 0.9655 How may I extract the "Naive SE" from the following output please? > summary(il6w.out) Call: zelig(formula = il6.data$il6 ~ il6.data$apache, model =

Dear R-Users: I am trying to find the robust (or sandwich) estimates of the standard error of fixed effects parameter estimates using the package "lmer2". In model-1, I used "robust=TRUE" on the other, in model-2, I used "robust=FALSE". Both models giving me the same estimates. So my question is, does the robust option works in lmer2 to get the robust estimates of

Hello R-Users: I am want to use tobit regression for left censored panel/longitudinal data. Could you please provide me the name of "library" and/or "package" that will give me option of fitting tobit regression model for longitudinal data? Thank you. Sattar __________________________________________________ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-Helpers: I have tried everything I can think of and hope not to appear too foolish when my error is pointed out to me. I have some real data (18 points) that look linear on a log-log plot so I used them for a comparison of lm() and survreg. There are no suspensions. survreg.df <- data.frame(Cycles=c(2009000, 577000, 145000, 376000, 37000, 979000, 17420000, 71065000, 46397000,

I am trying to fit a lognormal distribution on interval-censored data. Some of my intervals have a lower bound of zero. Unfortunately, it seems like survreg() cannot deal with lower bounds of zero, despite the fact that plnorm(0)==0 and pnorm(-Inf)==0 are well defined. Below is a short example to reproduce the problem. Does anyone know why survreg() must behave that way? Is there an alternate

Hello, I have a question regarding the use of an offset term with survreg(), in the Survival library. In particular, I am trying to figure out on what scale the offset term should be. Here's a simple example with no censoring and no coefficients: --------- y = rlnorm(1000, meanlog = 10, sdlog = 2) delta = rep(1, 1000) int = rep(1, 1000) survreg(Surv(y,delta)~offset(10*int), dist =

Hello Everybody: I am searching for an R package for fitting Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with weights (i.e. Weighted Estimating Equations). From the R documentation I found "geese(geepack)" for fitting Generalized Estimating Equations. In this documentation, under the paragraph “weights” it has been written, “an optional vector of weights to be used in the fitting process.

Hello EVERYONE, I need an URGENT help from you please! How can I see the "estfun" (empirical estimating function) and "df" (degree of freedom) from the following mixed-model please? (fm1 <- lmer2(Reaction ~ Days + (Days|Subject), sleepstudy)) Many thanks in advance for your kind help. Sattar

Folks, Based on http://www.biostat.wustl.edu/archives/html/s-news/1999-06/msg00125.html I thought I should experiment with using survreg() to estimate tobit models. I start by simulating a data frame with 100 observations from a tobit model > x1 <- runif(100) > x2 <- runif(100)*3 > ystar <- 2 + 3*x1 - 4*x2 + rnorm(100)*2 > y <- ystar > censored <- ystar <= 0

Hello, I have interval censored data, censored between (0, 100). I used the tobit function in the AER package which in turn backs on survreg. Actually I'm struggling with the distribution. Data is asymmetrically distributed, so first choice would be a Weibull distribution. Unfortunately the Weibull doesn't allow for zero values in time data, as it requires x > 0. So I tried the

> I was wondering why survreg (in survival package) can not handle > three-way interactions. I have an AFT ..... You have given us no data to diagnose your problem. What do you mean by "cannot handle" -- does the package print a message "no 3 way interactions", gives wrong answers, your laptop catches on fire when you run it, ....? Also, make sure you read

Calum had a long question about drawing survival curves after fitting a Weibull model, using pweibull, which I have not reproduced. It is easier to get survival curves using the predict function. Here is a simple example: > library(survival) > tfit <- survreg(Surv(time, status) ~ factor(ph.ecog), data=lung) > table(lung$ph.ecog) 0 1 2 3 <NA> 63 113 50 1

Hi. I am looking for a function for left-truncated data. I have one data set with 2 variables (Hours~Yrs_Ed). I already left-censored the data at 200 and left-truncated it at the same spot, so that I am able to make 2 estimations (one for censoring and one for truncation). I know how to make the linear regression for the left-censored variable (hours) and how to plot the regression line into the

Dear All, I have two questions regarding distribution fitting. I have several datasets, all left-truncated at x=1, that I am attempting to fit distributions to (lognormal, weibull and exponential). I had been using fitdistr in the MASS package as follows: fitdistr<-(x,"weibull") However, this does not take into consideration the truncation at x=1. I read another posting in this

Dear R-user: I have a left censored longitudinally measured data set with 4 variables such as sub (which is id), x (only covariate), y (repeatedly measured response) and w (weights) (note, ?-5? indicates the left censored value in the attached data set). I am using following R codes (?survival? library and ?survreg? package) for fitting a random effect tobit model for the left censored

Dear all, I am trying to find a suitable R-function for parametric proportional hazard regressions. The package survival contains the coxph() function which performs a Cox regression which leaves the base hazard unspecified, i.e. it is a semi-parametric method. The package Design contains the function pphsm() which is good for parametric proportional hazard regressions when the underlying base

Greetings -- I would like to estimate a proportional hazard model with a weibull or lognormal baseline. I have looked at both the coxph() and survreg() functions and neither appear (to me ) to do it. Am I missing something in the docs or is there another terrific package out there that will do this. Many Thanks. Carl Mason

Hi there. I am receiving an unexpected error message when creating a new distribution for the survreg() function in the survival package. I understand the survival.distributions() function and have been following the Cauchy example provided in the help file. My goal is to use survreg to fit a gamma distribution to interval censored data. Here is a simple example of what I'm trying to do.

Hi, I have a right-censored (positive) random variable (e.g. failure times subject to right censoring) that is observed for N subjects: Y_i, I = 1, 2, ..., N. Note that Y_i = min(T_i, C_i), where T_i is the true failure time and C_i is the censored time. Let us assume that C_i is independent of T_i. Now, I would like to generate another random variable U_i, I = 1, 2, ..., N, which is

Hola, ¿qué tal? Tengo una pregunta de esta