similar to: save multiple pages lattice-plot

Full_Name: Katell Hamon Version: 2.2.1 OS: windows Submission from: (NULL) (130.226.135.149) I have a problem in : xyplot(df[,v] ~ df$year , [....] ) the error is "Error in df[, v] : object is not subsettable" but this used to run well with versions of R before R 2.1.1 it seems to be a problem with the new way of

[I don't know whether this is the appropriate list, if not please let me know to whom to write. I submitted this as a CUPS bug and they replied by asking me to contact the "Samba folks"? I guess that is you] Hi, I'm using a MacBook Pro with MacOS X 10.6.4 and am trying to print on my company's printer accessible via samba. Whenever I try to access the print server via

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how > important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a > commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding > Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license, > for including

Roman Levenstein wrote: > - possibility of using 3rd party libs like Boost (or their parts) in LLVM > There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters, regardless of its license, for

Hi, I am using the densCols to draw a high volume scatter plot. Instead of using the default local density, I would like to take log of the local density and then map them to the colors. I could not figure out how to do that. For example: plot(x,y,col=densCols(x,y,"log")) ? Any help would be appreciated! Jiaxiu [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, I am encountering some issues with my data and need some help. I am trying to run glm analysis with a presence/absence variable as response variable and several explanatory variable (time, location, presence/absence data, abundance data). First I tried to use the glm() function, however I was having 2 warnings concerning glm.fit () : # 1: glm.fit: algorithm did not converge # 2:

Dear all, I am organizing a set of specific R code as package (to ease the documentation and deployment of it to users). Before doing so, I would like to know if there are written coding rules for R (with functions, objects naming convention for example). Thanks a lot, Thomas -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas LOUBRIEU IFREMER IDM/ISI BP70 29280

On Jul 8, 2008, at 4:57 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, David Greene wrote: >>> Since I think it really is a part of the LLVM internals, I don't >>> think >>> that mangling it with a prefix is the right way to go. This would >>> significantly increase verbosity in the code and would be generally >>> detrimental. >>

On Apr 10, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > Dominic Hamon wrote: >> Duncan Sands wrote: >>>> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder >>>> and rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the >>>> case, I'd argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the >>>> old non-folding

me22 wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > >> There is a thread elsewhere on this mailing list illustrating how >> important it is for the maintainers of LLVM to keep LLVM usable in a >> commercial environment. As such, I would strongly recommend avoiding >> Boost as it has a bad name in some quarters,

Thank you very much Dirk! Le mer. 13 mai 2020 ? 14:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> a ?crit : > > Salut Adrien, > > It appears to be a bad OpenMP and and OpenBLAS interaction you can (for > now) > avoid) by replacing the 'pthread' variant of OpenBLAS with the OpenMP > version > (see the thread for details). Doing > > sudo apt install

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Dominic Hamon <dom.hamon at gmail.com> wrote: > It has also been mentioned that it is also true for LLVM itself, and it > is. However, the amount of code in LLVM, and the specific nature of its > usage and what it is for lends itself to better contribution tracking > immediately. Boost is a nebulous piece of software with a wide range of >

Duncan Sands wrote: >> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder and >> rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, I'd >> argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old non-folding >> functionality for debugging purposes. >> > > this plan sounds good to me. However it's not clear to me how

Dominic Hamon wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: >>> Another option that was discussed in #llvm is to nuke LLVMBuilder >>> and rename LLVMFoldingBuilder to LLVMBuilder. If this was the case, >>> I'd argue for a flag in the Builder that could retain the old >>> non-folding functionality for debugging purposes. >>> >> >> this plan

On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:54 AM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > Hello llvm dev peeps > > I would like to use an LLVMBuilder pointer as a base pointer to > reference either an LLVMBuilder or an LLVMFoldingBuilder. As the > methods > in the Folding builder have the same names as the base class, I > thought > about submitting a patch whereby the base class methods would become >

Hello llvm dev peeps I would like to use an LLVMBuilder pointer as a base pointer to reference either an LLVMBuilder or an LLVMFoldingBuilder. As the methods in the Folding builder have the same names as the base class, I thought about submitting a patch whereby the base class methods would become virtual. However, the base class methods return specific types while the Folding builder, for

Many Thanks Rowland to have read and respond to this very long mail Le 18/11/2020 ? 12:46, Rowland penny via samba a ?crit?: >>> NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS > Are the Unix clients joined to the domain and do they use a DC as their > first nameserver ? No linux clients aren't binded by any mean to the AD Their name servers in /etc/resolv.conf are standards bind resolvers

I have upgraded R (from 3.6 to 4.0) and RStudio (from 1.1 to 1.2.5) a few days ago, and Ubuntu from 18.04 to 20.04 yesterday. Since then, R sometimes never terminates when executing certain commands: ivreg (from package AER), summary (of a logit regression) and logitmfx (from package mfx). Sometimes these commands run fine, but most of the time I have to kill the process because R won't

Bill Wendling wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: > >> Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: >> >>> Sorry to step into this in the middle of a thread, but what exactly is >>> LLVM's autoconf doing that "autoconf shouldn't do if properly set up"?

On 18/11/2020 10:42, Gregory ROCHER via samba wrote: > Hi all > > I'm looking for some help on winbind/idmap for a new host > > > We want to use security=ads so we join this host to the domain > No problem for windows clients : they can mount shares that are > accessible to their primary unix group and secondary unix group(s) You are using AD now, so the primary group