similar to: summary of summaries

I've just written this patch, it's undergone minimal testing and "works for me" and I'm after feedback as to acceptability of approach, anything I should be doing differently for the feature to be acceptable upstream and what I should be doing about automated testing. Use-case: you have the host's SSH fingerprints via an out-of-band mechanism which you trust and want to

I've got an example where I think that there should be some loop-invariant optimization happening, but it's not. Here's the C code: #define DIM 8 #define UNROLL_DIM DIM typedef double InArray[DIM][DIM]; __declspec(noalias) void f1( InArray c, const InArray a, const InArray b ) { #pragma clang loop unroll_count(UNROLL_DIM) for( int i=0;i<DIM;i++) #pragma clang loop

I was looking at the code generated from the following c code and noticed extra loads in the inner-loop of these nested for-loops: #define DIM 8 #define UNROLL_DIM DIM typedef double InArray[DIM][DIM]; void f1( InArray c, InArray a, InArray b ) { #pragma clang loop unroll_count(UNROLL_DIM) for( int i=0;i<DIM;i++) #pragma clang loop unroll_count(UNROLL_DIM) for( int

I tried changing 'noalias' to 'restrict' in the code and I get: fma.c:17:12: warning: 'restrict' attribute only applies to return values that are pointers It seems like 'noalias' would be the correct attribute here, from the article you linked: "if a function is annotated as noalias, the optimizer can assume that, in addition to the parameters themselves,

Hi, I would consider the calculation of r-squared in the following to be a bug, but then, I've been wrong before. It seems that R looks to see if the model contains an intercept term, and if it does not, computes r-squared in a way I don't understand. To my mind, the following are two alternative parametrizations of the same model, and should yield the same r-squared. Any insight much

I am running the R-0.62.0 snapshot on a Linux system. This system has 128 Mb of real memory and almost never swaps. I am trying to use lme() on a very large example (7200 observations, 10 columns in the fixed effects, 2 columns in the random effects). We have the optimization nicely tuned so that goes relatively quickly. It seems, though, that all the data manipulation steps before the

Dear all, I have a simple question. I couldn't find a solution in the forums/R-user manual; I have also asked to my friends who use R, but couldn't get any answer from them either. I would appreciate any solutions. I want to write formatted text file like in Fortran. More specifically with the format choice of mine for any given line (more specifics are given below). The R function

Hi all, I was going to open a ticket for this, but I already had most of the code done, so I decided to just set it up. Transaction reports can now generate summaries from their metrics. Here''s a simple example from a script applying two ''exec'' instances: Changes: Total: 2 Resources: Applied: 2 Out of sync: 2 Scheduled: 2

Hi All, I would like to use meta.summaries from package rmeta to do a meta-analysis. I have available effect sizes as r's (which could be easily transformed to effect sizes in terms of d's). My problem is that I'm not sure what the se's of these r's should be ... The r-values are themselves computed from F-tests and t-tests for various studies. Are there R-functions that

I'm pleased to announce the release of the "arsenal" package v0.5.0 on CRAN (https://cran.r-project.org/package=arsenal). There are 4 items I want to mention: 1. arsenal is now on github: https://github.com/eheinzen/arsenal 2. ~10 bugs have been fixed in the latest release. 3. Tired of subsetting data.frames and losing your labels? Try the new keep.labels

Hi folks, The next LLVM Social Berlin will take place the next Thursday, the 31st of May. Stefan Gränitz will talk about ThinLTO and Incremental JIT Compilation. More details here: https://www.meetup.com/LLVM-Social-Berlin/events/250509247/ See you there. Cheers, Alex. -- AlexDenisov Software Engineer, https://lowlevelbits.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

> > mail_location = maildir:~:CONTROL=/var/no-quota/%u At first glance the above looks like it may be wrong or a typo. I don't remember now why I added the following, but it seems like it may be worth a shot: imap_client_workarounds = delay-newmail tb-extra-mailbox-sep tb-lsub-flags > > mbox_dirty_syncs = no > mbox_lazy_writes = no Pretty sure the above is for mbox if you

On 16 Apr 2015, at 04:45, David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> wrote: > > My Dovecot 2.2.16 server is interacting poorly with a variety of mail clients. The symptoms include disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, and excessive full re-downloads. What were you running before Dovecot v2.2.16? An earlier Dovecot? A whole different system? >

On 18 Apr 2015, at 15:02, David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> wrote: > >>> dovecot.log shows runs of this error: >>> Apr 15 09:02:37 imap(user at domain.com): Warning: Maildir /mail/domain.com/user//.Sent: Expunged message reappeared, giving a new UID (old uid=306286, file=1429102024.M826331P1156.host,S=1678,W=1724:2,S) >>> >>> or this error:

On Apr 18, 2015, at 8:00 AM, David Gessel wrote: > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads > From: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> > To: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> > Date: Sat Apr 18 2015 15:48:28 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard

On Apr 18, 2015, at 9:09 AM, David Gessel wrote: > Edgar, thanks for the help! > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads > From: Edgar Pettijohn III <edgar at pettijohn-web.com> > To: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> > Date: Sat Apr

On 18 Apr 2015, at 16:00, David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> wrote: > >> No. My best guess is that (your) ZFS+FreeBSD is simply not behaving the way Dovecot wants filesystems to behave (readdir() sometimes skipping over files). I don't have any other suggestion than trying a different filesystem or OS. I haven't heard ZFS having these problems before though. >

-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Dovecot 2.2.16: disappearing messages, mismatched summaries, duplicated messages, excessive full re-downloads From: David Gessel <gessel at blackrosetech.com> To: Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi> Date: Sat Apr 18 2015 20:35:40 GMT+0300 (Arabic Standard Time) > THANKS TIMO! > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re:

Since you have confirmed that someone else you know is using it on FreeBSD+ZFS without these problems, have you tried asking on the FreeBSD support list(s)? Seems like that may be your best bet, since it is certainly not a generic dovecot problem (but may indeed be one or more of the settings you are using)... You could also go ahead and post the diff of your config and your friends (I'm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, David Gessel wrote: > I'm inclined to believe, as trivial as it may be to enumerate, that: > > Something is triggering dovecot to believe the indexes need to be rebuilt. > When checking mail during the rebuild, clients get confused by UIDs in transition. > > I would think that sdbox would alleviate these