similar to: Questions about EM algorithm

Hi all, I appreciate the help this list has given me before. I have a question which has been perplexing me. I have been working on doing a Bayesian calculating inserting studies sequentially after using a non-informative prior to get a meta-analysis type result. I created a function using three iterations of this, my code is below. I insert prior mean and precision (I add precision manually

Windows 7, R 2.12.1 Colleagues, I am trying to understand the n.for.2means function. The code below is a copy of the function (renamed to n.for.2means.js). I have inserted a single line of code towards the bottom of the function which uses the cat function to print the value of n1. You will note the value (preceded by stars) is printed as 1. The function (1) prints a lot of output without any

Dear All, I may look ridiculous, but I am puzzled at the behavior of the nls with a fitting I am currently dealing with. My data are: x N 1 346.4102 145.428256 2 447.2136 169.530634 3 570.0877 144.081627 4 721.1103 106.363316 5 894.4272 130.390552 6 1264.9111 36.727069 7 1788.8544 52.848587 8 2449.4897 25.128742 9 3464.1016 7.531766 10 4472.1360 8.827367 11

Dear R helpers I have following data stocks <- c("ABC", "DEF", "GHI", "JKL") prices_df <- data.frame(ABC = c(17,24,15,22,16,22,17,22,15,19),                                          DEF = c(22,28,20,20,28,26,29,18,24,21),                                           GHI = c(32,27,32,36,37,37,34,23,25,32),                                          

I am wanting to plot a 95% confidence band using segplot, yet I am wanting to have groups. For example if I have males and females, and then I have them in different races, I want the racial groups in different panels. I have this minor code, completely made up but gets at what I am wanting, 4 random samples and 4 samples of confidence, I know how to get A & B into one panel and C&D in to

Dear R users, I used to "OPTIM" to minimize the obj. function below. Even though I used the true parameter values as initial values, the results are not very good. How could I improve my results? Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Kathryn Lord #------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ x = c(0.35938587,

Dear R users, I used to "OPTIM" to minimize the obj. function below. Even though I used the true parameter values as initial values, the results are not very good. How could I improve my results? Any suggestion will be greatly appreciated. Regards, Kathryn Lord #------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ x = c(0.35938587,

HI Guys, I know that this forum is not for homework but I am trying to interpret R output code. I was just wondering if someone might be able to help. I have been given the following. For (X1,X2) distributed bivariate normal with parameters mu1 = 5.8 mu2 = 5.3 sd1 = sd2 = 0.2 and p = 0.6 The r-code and inpit/output are as follows input m <- 5.3 + 0.6*(6.3 - 5.8) s <-

For several years, I have been using Splus to analyze an ongoing series of datasets that have a bimodal distribution. I have used the following functions, in particular the ms() function, to estimate the parameters: two means, two standard deviations, and one proportion. Here is the code I've been using in S: btmp.bi <- function(vec, p, m1, m2, sd1, sd2) {

Hi, i would to know, if someone have ever write the code to estimate the parameter (mixing proportion, mean, a var/cov matrix) of a mixture of two multivariate normal distribution. I wrote it and it works (it could find mean and mixing proportion, if I fix the var/cov matrix), while if I fix anything, it doesn't work. My suspect is that when the algorithm iterates the var/cov matrix, something

Hi, i would to know, if someone have ever write the code to estimate the parameter (mixing proportion, mean, a var/cov matrix) of a mixture of two multivariate normal distribution. I wrote it and it works (it could find mean and mixing proportion, if I fix the var/cov matrix), while if I fix anything, it doesn't work. My suspect is that when the algorithm iterates the var/cov matrix, something

Hi, I am new to R. My problem is with the ordered logistic model. Here is my question: Generate an order discrete variable using the variable wrwage1 = wages in first full calendar quarter after benefit application in the following way: * wage*1*Ordered *= 1 *if*0 *· wrwage*1 *< *1000 2 *if*1000 *· wrwage*1 *< *2000 3 *if*2000 *· wrwage*1 *< *3000 4 *if*3000 *· wrwage*1 *<

Hi, I run this code to get the power of the test for modified bartlett's test..but I'm not really sure that my coding is right.. #normal distribution unequal variance asim<-5000 pv<-rep(NA,asim) for(i in 1:asim) {print(i) set.seed(i) n1<-20 n2<-20 n3<-20 mu<-0 sd1<-sqrt(25) sd2<-sqrt(50) sd3<-sqrt(100) g1<-rnorm(n1,mu,sd1) g2<-rnorm(n2,mu,sd2)

hello, I would like to create the following barplot: I have 4 different data sets (same length + stddev for each data point) data1 sd1 data2 sd2 data3 sd3 data4 sd4 now, I'd like to plot in the following way: data1[1],data2[1],data3[1],data4[1] with it's sd-values side-by-side at one x-axis label (named "position 1") and each bar in different colors.

Dear list, i'm trying to test if a linear combination of coefficients of glm is equal to 0. For example : class 'cl' has 3 levels (1,2,3) and 'y' is a response variable. We want to test H0: mu1 + mu2 - mu3 =0 where mu1,mu2, and mu3 are the means for each level. for me, the question is how to get the covariance matrix of the estimated parameters from glm. but perhaps there

I continue to struggle with mixed models. The square zero version of the problem that I am trying to deal with is as follows: A number (240) of students are measured (tested; for reading comprehension) on 6 separate occasions. Initially (square zero) I want to treat the test time as a factor (with 6 levels). The students are of course ``random effects''. Later I want to look at

----- Forwarded Message ----- From: vramaiah at neo.tamu.edu To: "bernhard pfaff" <bernhard.pfaff at pfaffikus.de> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:03:11 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Use of R for VECM Hello Fellow R'ers I am a new user of R and I am applying it for solving Bi-Variate (Consumption and Output) VECM with Co-Integration (I(1)) with three lags on

Please help me in writing the R code for this problem. I've been solving this for 4 days. It was hard for me to solve it. It's a simulation problem in R. The problem is My true model is a normal mixture which is given as 0.5 N(-0.8,1) + 0.5 N(0.8,1). This model has two components. I will get a random sample of size 100 from this model. I will do this 300 times. That means, I will have

Dear List: I am running into a memory issue that I haven't noticed before. I am running a simulation with all of the code used below. I have increased my memory to 712mb and have a total of 1 gb on my machine. What appears to be happening is I run a simulation where I create 1,000 datasets with a sample size of 100. I then run each dataset through a gls and obtain some estimates. This works

I have historically noticed that in ZFS, when ever there is a heavy writer to a pool via NFS, the reads can held back (basically paused). An example is a RAID10 pool of 6 disks, whereby a directory of files including some large 100+MB in size being written can cause other clients over NFS to pause for seconds (5-30 or so). This on B70 bits. I''ve gotten used to this behavior over NFS, but