similar to: Random and fixed effect model with a covariate

Hello, I have a couple questions regarding generalized linear mixed models specifically around fitting the random effects terms correctly to account for any pseudo-replication. I am reading through and trying to follow examples from Zuur et al. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R, but am still at bit unsure if I am specifying the models correctly. Background information: Our

Hi All, I'm working with some SAS code to analyze an experiment set up as follows: 66 subjects (colonies) treated with a random treatment (1-8) and measured at three time points. The data structure looks like: input colony tmt y1 y2 y3; y=y1; date=*1*; output; y=y2; date=*2*; output; y=y3; date=*3*; output; datalines; 1

Trying to plot multiple lines from a simple matrix with headers (eight observations per column). I will be doing a number of these, with varying numbers of columns, and do not want to enter the header names for each one (I got frustrated and just wrote them out, which did work). Data reads fine, first plot is fine, but when i use the code at the bottom for a for i loop it tells me that x and y

I don't think, this has been answered: > I'm trying to run a 3-way within-subject anova in lme with 3 > fixed factors (Trust, Sex, and Freq), but get stuck with handling > the random effects. As I want to include all the possible random > effects in the model, it would be something more or less > equivalent to using aov > > > fit.aov <- aov(Beta ~ >

En innebygd og tegnsett-uspesifisert tekst ble skilt ut... Navn: ikke tilgjengelig Nettadresse: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20080129/5f8a6ac4/attachment.pl

I am trying to run a GLMM on some binomial data. My fixed factors include 2 dichotomous variables, day, and distance. When I run the model: modelA<-glmmPQL(Leaving~Trial*Day*Dist,random=~1|Indiv,family="binomial") I get the error: iteration 1 Error in MEEM(object, conLin, control$niterEM) : Singularity in backsolve at level 0, block 1 >From looking at previous help

I don't have any experience of your problem - but I thought this might help. http://www.hut.fi/Misc/Electronics/circuits/uk_wiring.html <http://www.hut.fi/Misc/Electronics/circuits/uk_wiring.html> The UK (and some of it's former colonies) use a system called 3-wire ringing. Some equipment from overseas requires an adaptor to make it work. I don't know if the LineJack is one

I have a large dataset where each Subject answered seven similar Items, which are binary yes/no questions. So I've always used Subject and Item random effects in my models, fit with lmer(), e.g.: model<-lmer(Response~Race+Gender+...+(1|Subject_ID)+(1| Item_ID),data,binomial) But I recently realized something. Most of the variables that I've tested as fixed effects are properties

Hello all! Consider a dataset with a grouping structure, Group (factor) Several treatments, Treat (factor) Some sort of yield, Yield (numeric) Something, possibly important, measured for each group; GroupCov (numeric) To look for fixed effects from Treat on Yield, a first attempt could be: m1 <- lm(Yield ~ Treat) which gives, in a symmetric situation, the same estimated fixed effects as:

On Thu, February 5, 2015 10:08 am, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 09:41 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> >> > wac4140SoeTer'#621strAAt0918;@@ >> > >> > Gee thanks. I'll use it for root on every server ;-) > >> I know this is joke. Yet (in a slim chance someone out there can follow >> it >> with seriousness)

I am trying to perform a model 3 ANOVA for a 2 factor (say factor A and factor B) anova in which factor A is fixed and factor B is random. Therefore, the error term for the test of factor A should be the A:B interaction term and the error terms for B and A:B should be the model residual (within) term. I have tried to work out how to specify such error strata using aov, however, I have had

Hi ! I try to compare some models obtained from glmmPQL. model1 <- glmmPQL(y~red*yellow+I(red^2)+I(yellow^2)+densite8+I(densite8^2)+freq8_4 +I(freq8_4^2), random=~1|num, binomial); model2 <- glmmPQL(y~red*yellow+I(red^2)+I(yellow^2)+densite8+I(densite8^2)+freq8_4 , random=~1|num, binomial); anova(model1, model2) here is the answer : Erreur dans anova.lme(model1, model2) : Objects must

Hello. I am fitting a two-level mixed model which assumes equality of variance in the lowest-level residuals across groups. The call is: fit3<-lme(CLnNAR~CLnRGR,data=meta.analysis, + na.action="na.omit",random=~1+CLnRGR|study.code) I want to test the assumption of equality of variances across groups at the lowest level. Can someone tell me how to do this? I know that one

Hi, I am a first user of R. I was hoping I could get some help on some data I need to analyze. The experimental design is a complete randomized design with 2 factors (Source material and Depth). The experimental design was suppose to consist of 4 treatments replicated 3 time, Source 1 and applied at 10 cm and source 2 applied at 20 cm. During the construction of the treatmetns the depths vary

Dear Madam or Sir, I need to do multiple comparisons following nlme analysis (Compare the effects of different treatments on a response measured repeatedly over time; fixed = response ~ treat*time). On the web I found the notion that one might use the L argument from ANOVA. Do you have an example to show how this works together with nlme? Are there other ways to do a post-hoc analysis in

This graph -> http://www.math.hope.edu/~tanis/dallas/images/disth36.gif is an example I found at http://www.math.hope.edu/~tanis/dallas/disth1.html created by Maple. Does anybody know how to create something similar in R? I have a feeling it could be possible using scatterplot3d (perhaps with type=h, the fourth example in help('scatterplot3d')?), but I cannot figure it out. Thanks in

Hi, All; When I generate a "special" paper postscript image larger than "a4" or "letter" using R, I can only see one-page portion of all image, of course. What will be the simple solution for this? Is there any way I can set the bounding box information on the image? Or any other suggestions? Thanks in advance; Tae-Hoon Chung

Hi guys, I'm a photographer and I want to use the software that my camera manufacturer makes. I can install the application like View NX 2 but Nikon trasnfer makes an error. I want to know what information do I have to gather for help or what should I need to correct this erros. If any interested of helping please just reply. Thank you.

Dear all, I do not seem to grasp how contrasts are set for ordered factors. Perhaps someone can elighten me? When I work with ordered factors, I would often like to be able to reduce the used polynomial to a simpler one (where possible). Thus, I would like to explicetly code the polynomial but ideally, the intial model (thus, the full polynomial) would be identical to one with an ordered factor.

Dear all, Suppose I have a linear mixed-effects model (from the package nlme) with nested random effects (see below); how would I present the results from the random effects part in a publication? Specifically, I?d like to know: (1) What is the total variance of the random effects at each level? (2) How can I test the significance of the variance components? (3) Is there something like an