similar to: step and glm : keep all models

Why is it more important to be backward compatible with ancient versions of GCC than relatively more recent versions of Visual Studio? We are removing support for VS2013 because of defects in that product, yet GCC v4.7.x is more ancient than VS2013, so why should the answer be any different? Devil's Advocate, MartinO -----Original Message----- From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 01:14:06AM -0700, Mehdi Amini wrote: > > > On Oct 11, 2016, at 1:11 AM, sylvain.bertrand at gmail.com wrote: > > > > Then? How to proceed? > > Submit a patch seems like the best way forward on the short term. Ok, the authors of the targetted code need to proceed to a re-design of their code regarding the use of c++ features. The git log tells

> On Oct 11, 2016, at 1:46 PM, Michael Kuperstein via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > To the best of my understanding - because we want to be able to bootstrap clang with the system compiler that ships with various linux and BSD distributions. > Windows has no equivalent concept. I mean no offense to linux/BSD developers, but should we have a discussion (in

Hi, The problem is modern c++. I can have a reasonable system boostrape-ed with (tinycc/alternative C compiler), but only in the gcc world since a modern c++ compiler is only bootsrape-able from near any C compiler there. clang and llvm are unable to do it. That why I would need to get 2 gccs: "any C compiler" -> gcc 4.7.4 -> gcc recent_version -> llvm. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16103 Summary: http://www.leparisien.fr of 26052008 crashed with swfdec Product: swfdec Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: plugin AssignedTo: swfdec at

Hi everyone, First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I''m not sure that this is the right place for my question (please don''t shoot me down ;)). For the record, I''ve been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and it''s a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking. My problem: I want to setup a tunnel for the following

Hello, I'd like to sum the weights of each independent variable across linear models that have been evaluated using AIC. For example: > library(MuMIn) > data(Cement) > lm1 <- lm(y ~ ., data = Cement) > dd <- dredge(lm1, beta = TRUE, eval = TRUE, rank = "AICc") > get.models(dd, subset = delta <4) There are 5 models with a Delta AIC Score of

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14680 Summary: Unable to save .flv or copy-paste the link Product: swfdec Version: git Platform: All OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: plugin AssignedTo: swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 07:15:39PM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 12 October 2016 at 18:37, <sylvain.bertrand at gmail.com> wrote: > > Suggestion is not clear answer. How such a decision taken? Is there a board of > > people which have to vote to valid the choice of minimal gcc (and clang) version > > effective? > > We don't have such process, unfortunately.

Dear List, I want to ask a AIC question based on package library(MuMIn) The relative importance of 16 explanatory variables are assessed using delta AIC in a generalized linear model. Please kindly advise if it is possible to show models with any two only certain variables. Thank you. Elaine I asked a similar question and got a great help for models with only one variable as below.

Then? How to proceed? regards, -- Sylvain

Dear R-List users, Can anyone explain exactly the difference between Weights options in lm glm and gls? I try the following codes, but the results are different. > lm1 Call: lm(formula = y ~ x) Coefficients: (Intercept) x 0.1183 7.3075 > lm2 Call: lm(formula = y ~ x, weights = W) Coefficients: (Intercept) x 0.04193 7.30660 > lm3 Call:

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15568 Summary: http://www.southparkstudios.com/ Product: swfdec Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: plugin AssignedTo: swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy:

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16076 Summary: http://www.dailymotion.com Product: swfdec Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) URL: http://www.dailymotion.com OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: swfdec at

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14632 Summary: deezer.com does not work Product: swfdec Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: library AssignedTo: swfdec at lists.freedesktop.org ReportedBy: sylvain.bertrand at

Wine changes dozens of files to run properly. Last week a user couldnt login anymore his Windows XP after doing that. Btw, as you say world of warcraft doesnt use registry and is well known to work on wine too by copying the whole directory. I suggest you to do that. Its just a few megabytes of disk space versus a possibly unusable windows xp. Kind regards, Sylvain Petreolle (aka Usurp)

Could someone please tell me how to stop the package/function name from being included before the command prompt? This started happening today after I made some changes to my Rprofile.site file and I don't know why. For example: if I enter example(AIC), instead of just getting the regular '>' before each output line, I get 'AIC>' instead. I only want the '>'

Hi All: the package "MuMIn" can be used to select the model based on AIC or AICc. The code is as follows: data(Cement) lm1 <- lm(y ~ ., data = Cement) dd <- dredge(lm1,rank="AIC") print(dd) If I want to select the model by BIC, what code do I need to use? And when to select the best model based on AIC, what the differences between the function "dredge" in

I'm trying to add arguments to the AIC method for some classes -- things like weights=TRUE to calculate AIC weights corr=TRUE, nobs to calculate AICc delta=TRUE to put a delta-AIC column in the output. The problem is that AIC is defined as AIC(object, ..., k=2) where k is the constant associated with the penalty term and ... is a list of objects that will have their AICs calculated

Hello, I am using a simple linear model and I would like to get an AIC value. I came across both AIC() and extractAIC() and I am not sure which is best to use. I assumed that I should use AIC for a glm and extractAIC() for lm, but if I run my model in glm the AIC value is the same if I use AIC() on an lm object. What might be going on? Did I interpret these functions incorrectly? Thanks,