similar to: Rscript on OSX

How about building this in the CMake or auto* level we build a separate build script for it? I attache a simple version here. It does seem to work here. It's a shell script, which uses cmake for the building but it seems the second stage file works. I am not really sure why a third stage is needed, but it can be added quite easily. A windows version should be trivial to write (next week). A

Hi , This Is 'Suresh M' from AMD compiler team. 1) I obtained the source code of llvm and pool-alloc (relase_32 versions ) using the following commands, svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_32 llvm cd llvm/projects svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/poolalloc/branches/release_32 poolalloc 2) Was able to build the binaries and libraries

We are having some major problems with app_swift since we went live. It is regularly segfaulting. I don't know if this is my fault or not, but here's the story: Installed the cepstral voices (at the time, 4.0) on our test system (2.6.9-42.0.10.ELsmp) and later added some extra voices (now 4.2). All worked fine - we stress tested (20+ simultaneous calls). Move to live (

On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > The third stage is for comparing the output of clang (as compiled by > gcc) against clang (as compiled by clang). The whole process is: > > Stage 1: build clang with gcc > > Stage 2: build clang with the clang created by gcc > > Stage 3: build clang with the clang created by clang. > >

Hello, I''ve "emerged" Shorewall 2.0.7 onto my Gentoo pc. Going through the 2 interface quickstart guide I download the 2.0.1 interface sample and untar it. "tar -zxvf two-interfaces.tgz" Maybe a dumb question but I can''t find anything on Google or the Shorewall mail archives that say anything about this. So I''m assuming its me. :P But the

(sorry, now text format) Hello, i have a problem to download files to a samba share with Microsoft Edge. I got the message "file moved or deleted". (I don't know the exact message, because i have a german version of windows). After the download, there are two files in the directory: -rwxrwxr--+ 1 andi andi 0 Okt 28 21:42 xxx.pdf -rwxrwxr--+ 1 andi andi 286444 Okt 28 21:42

On 03/11/16 19:37, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:11:12PM +0000, Alex Crow via samba wrote: >> >> On 03/11/16 14:28, Ralph Böhme wrote: >>>> Ah, my smb.conf is missing the "ctdb socket" parameter. According to "man >>>> smb.conf" this should be set, but I don't remember seeing it on the wiki >>>> pages.

Hello list, I have some serious problems on my ext3 filesystem. Several folders contain files, which cannot be accessed in any way, not even a stat() on these files is possible: [~]$ ls -l -rwxrwxr-x 1 yvonne users 30208 2007-09-16 12:49 Stoffverteilungsplan tw kl4 07.doc ?--------- ? ? ? ? ? Teddyb?r.docx ?--------- ? ? ? ? ?

I updated samba to samba-2.0.7-4 (RedHat RPM). That didn't help. I changed the file ownership to user.group from user.user. That didn't help. I changed the file permissions to -rwxrwxr-- as you had suggested, and then it worked. (QuickBooks 99 needs *both* the file permissions set as noted *and* the ownership also.) However, when everyone closes QuickBooks the QBI file is deleted, and

Sirs, We've just successfully upgraded our samba server from 2.0 to 3.0. Access from windows clients and linux clients particularly RH7.3 and RH9.0 has no problem accessing the files and saving them. Unfortunately, we also have Mandrake and Knoppix workstations and in which we're having problems on the mounting of the samba shares. Mandrake and Knoppix basically uses the original

I will probably file a bug about this, but perhaps someone here will have some ideas. We have a problem with files being deleted instead of being saved when making changes in Microsoft Excel. The log shows an error of: 'Lock order violation'. This is with Samba 4.1.6 and happens on both Linux (2.6.25-14.fc9.i686) and Solaris 10. No such problem when running Samba 3.6.22. We have a setup

So pretty sure one of my boxes has been owned. Just wanted some advise on what to do next. Obviously, i'll need to nuke the fecker and start over but it would be really nice to find out how they got in as its a CentOS 4.3 which is bang up to date. So i found: PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME CPU COMMAND 7052 apache 25 0 27320 5348 8 R 99.0 0.5

On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a > > share. The situation is like this: > > > > Given a share "test" which exports "/test" to a NIS netgroup

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 februari 2019 16:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] unix_primary_group = yes don t work > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:58:52 +0100 > L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > > Hai

Hi Rui, We meet a problem when enable the execute in place (XIP, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execute_in_place) for uefi firmware with lld-link. We need to set the COFF executable file SectionAlignment through the lld-link /ALIGN option, but we find the SectionAlignment is hardcoded to 4096 which cause the /ALIGN option doesn't work at all. Below is the hardcode in lld: lld\COFF\Writer.h

Hey, I have two identical machines setup with a RAID 5 array. One of them is used for failovers and data from the master is synced everyday using rsync to the failover machine. The data on this disks are usually intranet KB's, DB's etc.. The RAID 5 arrays are formatted using the default options i,e mkfs.ext3 /dev/Xda. The RAID controller is 3ware escalade and each disk member in the RAID

On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 09:20 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/02/16 07:44, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 15:17 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:54:33PM +0100, Trond Hasle Amundsen wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have an issue with using a UNIX filegroup for access control within a >

Hi, I have some questions concerning mounted fs on a linux system. I run redhat linux 7.3 on my laptop, and when I hook it up to a desktop Windows 2000 Pro machine, I usually mount (part of) the Windows directories onto my linux dir tree (say, it is to /mnt/samba). I use the following command: mount /mnt/samba to mount the filesystem (file /usr/bin/smbmount has suid root, so I can do

Hello all, I have been struggling with a permission issue with Samba for over a week now. I've tried many different setup, without much success. I am using samba 3.6 on Arch Linux. The user I am testing with is a member of the group nobody. I have a share defined as it : security = share [public] path = /home/smbshare public = yes only guest = yes writable = yes printable =

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1"> <title></title> </head> <body text="#330000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> <tt><font size="+1">I am attempting to run the sun webserver 7