similar to: COMPAR.GEE error with logistic model

Dear all, I don't understand the following behaviour: Running compar.gee (in library ape ) with and without the option 'data', it give me different results Example: .... Start R .... > load("eiber.RData") > ls() [1] "gee.na" "mydata" "mytree" > library(ape) > # runnig with the option data= mydata > compar.gee(alt ~ R,

Hi, I'm attempting a comparative analysis using the function compare.gee, package (ape), which uses phylogeny as a correlation matrix in gee (package gee), in R version 2.2.0 on a Windows XP PC. I'm looking to model the relationship between a continuous explanatory variable and a binary response variable for 600 species, taking into account the phylogeny of those species. Here's

I'm using the function gee from the library(gee) gee(Y~X,id=clust.id,corstr="exchangeable",b=tmc$coef,family=binomial(link=logit),silent=T) Every time it runs, it dutifully prints out Beginning Cgee S-function, @(#) geeformula.q 4.13 98/01/27 user's initial regression estimate [,1] [1,] -4.5278335 [2,] -0.2737999 [3,] -0.9528306 [4,] 0.9393861 [5,]

Dear R-helpers, I am using the package "gee" to run a marginal model. Here is the output. In my simulated data, both x and z are time-varying, so I include their interaction terms with time indicator (i.e. tind=0, if time 1, and 1 if time 2) The data is simulated, so the true parameter of z both at time 1 and time 2 is 5, which is very close from the model output for time 1, z =

I am trying to learn the gee function in R. So I try to generate some data and use this function. I have the following lines: ######################################## Gee # Generating lny=10+2*Si-Si^2+eta # eta ~ N(0,1) # Si ~ U(0,11) eta <- vector(mode="numeric",100) eta <- rnorm(100) Si <- vector(mode="numeric",100) Si <- runif(100, min=0, max=11) lny <-

I am trying to use gee() to calculate the robust standard errors for a logit model. My dataset (zol) has 195019 observations; winner, racebl, raceas, racehi are all binary variables. ID is saved as a vector of length 195019 with alternating 0's and 1's. I get the following error message. I also tried the same command with corstr set to "independence" and got the same

Hello, Much like Charlie Wills a year ago, I am trying to run the APE program COMPAR.GEE with a model containing a categorical response variable and a continuous variable. My command code is : compar.gee(costusdata$Syndrome ~ costusdata$Stamen, phy = costustree, family = "binomial") I receive the following output with an error: Beginning Cgee S-function, @(#)

Hi, having used both the gee pacakge and the geepack package, i am unsure of how to interpret the results. Here are the results from the geeglm function from the geepack package > gee2<-geeglm(data$erythema~data$product, data = data, id=subject, > family=binomial, corstr="independence") Warning message: In model.response(mf, "numeric") : using

Dear all, It looks like the parameters var-cov matrix returned by gee() is not adjusted for the scale parameter: > fm1 <- gee(nbtrp ~ strate * saison + offset(log(surf)), family = poisson, data = Eff2001, + id = loc, tol = 1e-10, corstr = "exchangeable") [1] "Beginning Cgee S-function, @(#) geeformula.q 4.13 98/01/27" [1] "running glm to get initial

Dear all, I am working on modifying the R working matrix to commodate some other correlations that not included in the package. I am having problem to locate where the R matrix are defined for regular matrices, i.e. independence, exchangeable, AR and unstructure. it might have something within .C("Cgee",but don't understand it well enough to know. Can you anyone help? /*gee source

Hello, I am running the program COMPAR.GEE within the package APE. My dependent variable is binomial, while my independent variable is a multi-state categorical variable. The output reports an estimate for each state of the independent variable except the first one. For example, for the variable X with 3 states, the output is: intercept (estimate) X2 (estimate) X3 (estimate)

Hi I'm having some difficulty understanding my output (below) from GEE. the person who wrote the program included some comments about the '3-th term gives diff between hyp/ox at time..', and after created an L vector to use for a WALD test. I was wondering if someone could help me understand the GEE output, the programmers comment, how L was determined, and its use in the WALD

Hi, I would like to fit a GLM model with GEE on clustered data. I tried to use gee in the GEE package on a twin data set. All cluster are of size 2. I removed the missing data and ordered by IDENTIF2 first. library(gee) mod.pc <- gee(Y ~ X1 + X2 , id = IDENTIF2, family = binomial, corstr = "unstructured", data = na.omit(df)) gives the following result : Beginning Cgee S-function,

Hi, I am fitting a GEE model using gee R package, but I am not sure how to get OR and its CI? Could anyone give me some hints? Here are some output: > gee.obj <- gee(Affection~Sibsex+Probandsex,id = FAMID,family = binomial,corstr = "independence",data =seldata) Beginning Cgee S-function, @(#) geeformula.q 4.13 98/01/27 running glm to get initial regression estimate

*Dear R community* * * *I have two questions on data subsample manipulation. I am starting to use R again after a long brake and feel a bit rusty.* * * *I want to select a subsample of data for males and females separately* * * library(foreign) Datatemp <- read.spss("H:/Skjol/Data/HL/t1and2b.sav", use.value.labels = F) > table(Datatemp$sex) 1 2 3049 3702

I'm running some GEE models but when I request the summary(pcb.gee) all I get are rows and rows of intercorelations and they fill up the screen buffer so I can not even scroll back to see what else might be in the summary. How do I get the summary function to NOT print the intercorrelations? Thanks, -- Dean Sonneborn Programmer Analyst Department of Public Health Sciences University of

hi all- I am doing some research, have never used R before until today and need to understand the following program for a project. if some one could PLEASE help me understand this program ASAP i would GREATLY appreciate it (any syntax/ statistic comments would be great) PLEASE PLEASE HELP!! THANKYOU!!! -on a side note, it seems to me that R doesnt include the pv, and it was calculated

windows Vista R 2.10.1 Is it possible to get p values from gee? Summary(geemodel) does not appear to produce p values.: > fit4<- gee(y~time, id=Subject, data=data.frame(data)) Beginning Cgee S-function, @(#) geeformula.q 4.13 98/01/27 running glm to get initial regression estimate (Intercept) time 1.1215614 0.8504413 > summary(fit4) GEE: GENERALIZED LINEAR MODELS FOR

Hi A.K Regarding my question on comparing normal/ obese/overweight with blood pressure change, I did finally as per the first suggestion of stacking the data and creating a normal category . This only gives me a obese not obese 14, but when I did with the wide format hoping to get a obese14,normal14,overweight 14 Vs hibp 21, i could not complete any of the models. This time I classified obese=1

I've been comparing variables among objects (taxa) related by known trees, using phylogentically independent contrasts in the ape package, and want to move on to more complex models e.g. by using gls with appropriate correlation terms. My trees contain lots of (hard) polytomies and information about ancestors, which I've been including- creating fully dichotomous trees by using zero branch