similar to: How to choose the best Kernel in SVM classification

Hi all, I'm having this error, since I'm working with a data matrix I don't understand what's happening; I've tried several ways to solve this, even working with sparse matrix, but nothing seems to solve it, I've also tried svm (with a simple matrix 3*3 and still got the same error. > dados<-read.table("b.txt",sep="",nrows=30000) >

Hi all, Sorry to be bothering again with probably an easy error to fix, but I've been trying to solve the problem and haven't been able yet to do it. So I'm doing this: > dados<-read.table("b.txt",sep="",nrows=30000) >

Hello all, I am using the e1071 SVM with the tune options for classification, which work pretty well, given the examples of using tune.svm function for classification. But I have not found any example to tune the SVM novelty detection (one-classification) parameters (gamma, cost, nu), for example this are some of the options I have tried with no success: obj<-tune(svm, x,y, type

Hi all, I don't know how to choose the formula to use when plotting an svm model, I think I'm using the wrong one and so that is why I'm having trouble. I should be very grateful if someone could help me on this.. > dados<-read.table("b.txt",sep="",nrows=30000) >

Dear R-list! I am using the e1071 package in R to solve a binary classification problem in a dataset of round 180 predictor variables (blood metabolites) of two groups of subjects (patients and healthy controls). I am confused regarding the correct way to assess the classification accuracy of the trained svm. (A) The svm command allows to specificy via the 'cross=k' parameter to specify a

Hello, When calling several times the svm() function, I get different results. Do I miss something, or is there some random generation in the C library? In this second hypothesis, is it possible to fix an eventual seed? Thank you Pierre ### Example library('e1071') x = rnorm(100) # train set y = rnorm(100) c = runif(100)>0.5 x2 = rnorm(100)# test set y2 = rnorm(100) # learning a

Dear all, I am exploring the possibilities for automated classification of my data. I have successfully used KNN, but was thinking about looking at SVM (which I did nto use before). I have a pairwise distance matrix of training observations which are classified in set classes, and a distance matrix of new observations to the training ones. Is it possible to use distance matrices for SVM, and

Hi, I would like to know if there is an algorithm in R for testing if a data set as a normal destribution. Thank you for your time, Pedro Marques

Hi I am Aadhithya I am trying to write a code to classify microarray data (AML and ALL) using SVM in R my code goes like this : library(e1071) train<-read.table("Z:/Documents/train.txt",header=T); test<-read.table("Z:/Documents/test.txt",header=T); cl <- c(c(rep("ALL",10), rep("AML",10))); model<- svm(train,cl); pred <-

I run the following code, all other is ok, but plot(m.svm,p5.new,As~Cur) is not ok Anyone know why? install.packages("e1071") library(e1071) library(MASS) p5 <- read.csv("http://www.public.iastate.edu/~aiminy/data/p_5_2.csv") p5.new<-subset(p5,select=-Ms) p5.new$Y<-factor(p5.new$Y) levels(p5.new$Y) <- list(Out=c(1), In=c(0)) attach(p5.new)

Hi, I ran two svm models in R e1071 package: the first without cross-validation and the second with 10-fold cross-validation. I used the following syntax: #Model 1: Without cross-validation: > svm.model <- svm(Response ~ ., data=data.df, type="C-classification", > kernel="linear", cost=1) > predict <- fitted(svm.model) > cm <- table(predict,

Hi R users, I'm trying to run a SVM - regression using e1071 package but the function svm() all the time apply a classification method rather than a regression. svm.m1 <- svm(st ~ ., data = train, cost = 1000, gamma = 1e-03) Parameters: SVM-Type: C-classification SVM-Kernel: radial cost: 1000 gamma: 0.001 Number of Support Vectors: 209

Hello all, this is the first time I'm using R and e1071 package and SVM multiclass (and I'm not a statistician)! I'm very confused, then. The goal is: I have a sentence with sunny; it will be classified as "yes" sentence; I have a sentence with cloud, it will be classified as "maybe"; I have a sentence with rainy il will be classified as "no". The

I run the following code, all other is ok, but plot(m.svm,p5.new,As~Cur) is not ok Anyone know why? install.packages("e1071") library(e1071) library(MASS) p5 <- read.csv("http://www.public.iastate.edu/~aiminy/data/p_5_2.csv") p5.new<-subset(p5,select=-Ms) p5.new$Y<-factor(p5.new$Y) levels(p5.new$Y) <- list(Out=c(1), In=c(0)) attach(p5.new)

Hi This is a question regarding classification performance using different methods. So far I've tried NaiveBayes (klaR package), svm (e1071) package and randomForest (randomForest). What has puzzled me is that randomForest seems to perform far better (32% classification error) than svm and NaiveBayes, which have similar classification errors (45%, 48% respectively). A similar difference in

Dear All: I am trying to use the R function "svm" with "type =C-classification" , but I got the following error message SVM.Model1 <- svm(type ~ ., data=my.data.x1x2y, *type='C-classification'*, kernel='linear',scale=FALSE) *Error in eval(predvars, data, env) : object 'type' not found* I am wondering if I should install a specific R

Hi, I ran two svm models in R e1071 package: the first without cross-validation and the second with 10-fold cross-validation. I used the following syntax: #Model 1: Without cross-validation: > svm.model <- svm(Response ~ ., data=data.df, type="C-classification", > kernel="linear", cost=1) > predict <- fitted(svm.model) > cm <- table(predict,

Hi, This is probably going to be one of those, "It depends what you want" kind of answers, but I'm very curious to see if the group has an opinion or some general suggestions. The actual experiment is too complicated for a quick e-mail, but I'll summarize well enough(hopefully) to get the concepts across. Binary classification problem Using and SVM (e1071) to train a model

Dear All: Just fixed where is the problem I am trying to use the R function "svm" with "type~." , but I got the following error message SVM.Model1 <- svm(type ~ ., data=my.data.x1x2y, *type='C-classification'*, kernel='linear',scale=FALSE) *Error in eval(predvars, data, env) : object 'type' not found* I am wondering if I should install a

Dear all, I executed svm calculation using e1071 library with a microarray data (http://www.iu.a.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~kadota/R/data_Singh_RMA_3274.txt). Then, I shuffled the data samples and executed svm calculation again. The results of 2 calculation were different (in SV, coefs and weights). I attached the script below. Could please tell me why this happens? If possible please tell me how to make