similar to: can components have model?

the following is the code of the controller, under the dir components/test/: class Test::GroupsManController < ApplicationController uses_component_template_root def add_to_group @account = Account.find_by_nick(@params[:nick]) # render :text => "#{session[:account_id]} #{Group.find(session[:group_id]).owner_id}" if (session[:account_id] ==

> On Jul 14, 2017, at 10:22 AM, Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On Jul 14, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Brian

> On Jul 14, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Brian Gesiak via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq0q1hfzidg, Adam Nemet (cc'ed) describes >>

I have an AccountsController that inherits from ApplicationController. In ApplicationController I define a generic layout. In this layout I render @title that is actually assigned in the AccountsController but has a default value in ApplicationController. In the layout template, I also have the standard contents_for_layout and lastly, I have a render_component. The component called from the

Cool! I really like the idea. I left a comment about metadata preservation below. Once this is available we will certainly employ it to understand OpenMP programs better. We could also think about a user facing version of this while we are at it ;) ~ Johannes On 11/4/20 3:57 PM, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > > > I would like to propose a new !annotation metadata kind

Reduction Not Captured By LLVM CODE_1 ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- #include <stdio.h> int main() { int sum[1000]={1,2,3,4}; for (int i=1;i<1000;i++) { sum[0] +=sum[i-1]; } }

> On May 11, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Adam Nemet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On May 11, 2016, at 3:37 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov <mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> wrote: >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Adam Nemet" <anemet at apple.com <mailto:anemet at apple.com>> >>>

> On Oct 9, 2019, at 16:12, David Greene via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Mehdi AMINI via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > >>> I have a bit of concern about this sort of thing - worrying it'll lead to >>> people being less cautious about writing the more isolated tests. >>> >> >> I have the same

Hi, I would like to propose a new !annotation metadata kind that can be attached to arbitrary instructions to drive generating remarks that provide additional insight into transformations applied to a program. To motivate this, consider these specific questions we would like to get answered: * How many stores added for automatic variable initialization remain after optimizations? Where are

Sean, hopefully you’re OK with that reasoning. I went ahead and committed this in r313691. > On Sep 16, 2017, at 10:43 PM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > > >> On Sep 16, 2017, at 4:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com <mailto:chisophugis at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Actually maybe something like: >> >> if (auto &E

Hi, I''m relatively new to ruby and rails. I would like to have a sidebar component call one of several other constituent components. I''ve run into some problems, and so I''ve pruned things back to a relatively simple case. I have a sidebar component. Renders great. In it''s layout, I call render_component for another component I would like in the sidebar.

Hi, I''m plowing through the template section of "Agile Rails", specifically the stuff starting on P. 364. What is a good strategy for testing components? My initial thought is to mimic the Rails application "test" directory. No problem. Next copy the setup method, and set it up like so - class SidebarControllerTest < Test::Unit::TestCase def setup

Hi, Components are really great in rails for making some needed components. But I wish to configure those components in three ways. Global configuration in enviourment.rb, controller specific configuration and when calling controllers to render, I wish to give some config vars. I can figure out the last one by using helper, but I don''t know how I can do global configuration and

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-1 Severity: grave Tags: squeeze upstream Some newer hardware components (it is unclear what exactly causes the issue) render xen-hyervisor unusable as it crashes immediately after boot for the Debian out-of-box configuration. This results in a system rebooting all over again if the hypervisor is choosen as default stanza to be booted by grub

Hi I''m trying make a sidebar, and the view of the sidebar are components, ala Typo but with a variant. I made a Distributors components that render a select width a list of states(province in my country) and onchange of the select I fire a search of the distributors for that state. The things is I want use the find method in the component but I can''t from an url. can this be

Hi I''m trying make a sidebar, and the view of the sidebar are components, ala Typo but with a variant. I made a Distributors components that render a select width a list of states(province in my country) and onchange of the select I fire a search of the distributors for that state. The things is I want use the find method in the component but I can''t from an url. can this be

Another alternative could be: ORE.emitMissed(DEBUG_TYPE, ...) << ... Then the first line of emitMissed does a check if it is enabled and if not then returns a dummy stream that does nothing for operator<< (and short-circuits all the stream operations) On Sep 15, 2017 2:21 PM, "Adam Nemet via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: For better readability we

> On Sep 16, 2017, at 4:49 PM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote: > > Actually maybe something like: > > if (auto &E = ORE.emitMissed(DEBUG_TYPE)) { > E.emit(...) << ...; > } Well, the point of this interface was exactly to avoid writing a conditional. If you’re willing to use a conditional you can already write this: if

Adam, thanks for all the suggestions! One nice aspect of the `-Rpass` family of options is that I can filter based on what I want. If I only want to see which inlines I missed, I could use `clang -Rpass-missed="inline"`, for example. On the other hand, optimization remark YAML always include remarks from all passes (as far as I can tell), which increases the amount of time it takes

Hi, There was a recent discussion on generating non-temporal stores automatically[1]. This is a hard problem to get right. What seems like a much easier but still useful problem to solve is to provide diagnostics to the user where NT stores *may* help. Then the user can add the corresponding builtins and see if they are beneficial. My hope is that with the work to add profile-driven