similar to: multiple comparisons/tukey kramer

Hello, I am trying to determine the most appropriate way to run post-hoc comparisons on my lme model. I had originally planned to use Tukey HSD method as I am interested in all possible comparisons between my treatment levels. TukeyHSD, however, does not work with lme. The only other code that I was able to find, and which also seems to be widely used, is glht specified with Tukey:

I'm trying to do an ANCOVA with two factors (clipping treatment with two levels, and plot with 4 levels) and a covariate (stem diameter). The response variable is fruit number. The minimal adequate model looks like this: model3<-lm(fruit~clip + plot + st.dia + clip:plot) I'd like to get some multiple comparisons like the ones from TukeyHSD, but TukeyHSD doesn't work with the

Hello, I am performing a BACI analysis with ANOVA using the following glm: fit1<-glm(log(Cucs_m+1)~(BA*Otter)+BA+Otter+ID+Primary, data=b1) The summary(aov(fit1)) shows significance in the interaction; however, now I would like to determine what combinations of BA and Otter are significantly different (each factor has two levels). ID and PRIMARY substrates are categorical and included in

Dear list members, I'm running some tests looking at differences between means for various levels of a factor, using Tukey's HSD method. I would like to plot the data as boxplots or dotplots, with horizontal significance lines indicating which groups are statistically significantly different, according to Tukey HSD. Here's a nice image showing an example of such a graphical

I have a question about TukeyHSD and the glht function because I'm getting different answers when a covariate is included in model for ANCOVA.? I'm using the cabbages dataset in the 'MASS' package for repeatability.? If I include HeadWt as a covariate, then I get different answers when performing multiple comparisons using TukeyHSD and the glht function. The difference appears

Hi everyone, I am fairly new to R, and I am aware that others have had this problem before, but I have failed to solve the problem from previous replies I found in the archives. As this is such a standard procedure in psychological science, there must be an elegant solution to this...I think. I would much appreciate a solution that even I could understand... ;-) Now, I want to calculate a

Hi, I am seeking help with an error when running the example from R Documentation for TukeyHSD. The error occurs with any example I run, from any text book or website. thank you... > plot(TukeyHSD(fm1, "tension")). Error in plot(confint(as.glht(x)), ylim = c(0.5, n.contrasts + 0.5), ...) : error in evaluating the argument 'x' in selecting a method for function

Dear professors and collegues I need to perform a analysis of dates from a nested experimental design. From "Bioestatical Analysis" of Zar "Bimetry of Sokal" & Rohlf "Design and Analysis of Experiments" of Montgomery I have: Sum (mean(x)_i - mean(x)_T)2 / (a-1) -> var(epsilon) + n sigma2_B + n b (sum alfa_i)2 / (a-1) Sum (mean(x)_ij - mean(x)_i)2 /

Dear fellow R.users/.lovers, I am very new to both R and this list, so I hope you will be patient with me in the beginning if my enquiries are inappropriate/unclear. I am trying to perform some rather complex statistical modelling using mixed-effects models. I have, after a rather difficult beginning, finally boiled down my model (using the lme function in nlme) to a couple of fixed effects

Hi, I'm wondering if i can use the function "TukeyHSD" to perform the all pairwise comparisons of a "aov()" model with one factor (e.g., GROUP) and one continuous covariate (e.g., AGE). I did for example: library(multcomp) data('litter', package = 'multcomp') litter.aov <- aov(weight ~ gesttime + dose, data = litter) TukeyHSD(litter.aov, which =

I am having what I think is a strange problem with applying TukeyHSD to an aov fit with error strata. TukeyHSD is supposed to take "A fitted model object, usually an 'aov' fit." aov (with error strata) is supposed to generate an object of type aovlist, which is a list of objects of type aov. But I can't seem to feed components of my aovlist to TukeyHSD. I guess I

Hello, I am trying to do a manova test in r, and have used the "manova" function to test differences between two dependent variables. The results were significant for the whole model, but the sources I've read say that in order to do a post-hoc multiple comparison, I have to do separate aovs for each dependent variable, then call the TukeyHSD function. I have used the TukeyHSD with

Hey Folks: New to R and learning as I go, but really, I know just enough to get myself into trouble. I've waded through everything up till now, and don't see anything in the search that is directly helpful for the POS that I've created. The GOAL: All I want in the world is a program that performs 1-way ANOVA's on every column in a data set (taking the first column as the

Greetings, In the following one-way ANOVA I am attempting to calculate the means of each treatment along with their 95% Tukey confidence intervals for the data shown below using a routine from the HH package. library(HH) options(digits=10) # load data treat voltage 1 130 1 74 1 155 1 180 2 150 2 159 2 188 2 126 3 138 3 168 3 110 3 160 4 34

Hi there, The following data is obtained from a long-term experiments. > mydata <- read.table(textConnection(" + y year Trt + 9.37 1993 A + 8.21 1995 A + 8.11 1999 A + 7.22 2007 A + 7.81 2010 A + 10.85 1993 B + 12.83 1995 B + 13.21 1999 B + 13.70 2007 B + 15.15 2010 B + 5.69 1993 C + 5.76 1995 C + 6.39 1999

Dear Colleagues, I fit this model: mod1 <- lmer(x~category*comp+(1|id),data=impchiefsrm) where category has 4 levels and comp has 8 levels. These work: glht(mod1, linfct=mcp(category="Tukey") glht(mod1, linfct=mcp(comp="Tukey") What I'd like is (conceptually): glht(mod1, linfct=mcp(category:comp="Tukey") but it gives a syntax error. Any help is

Hi all: I have a question about multi-comparison. The data is in the attachment. My purpose: Compare the predicted means of the 3 methods(a,b,c) pairwisely. I have 3 ideas: #idea1 result_aov<-aov(y~ method + x1 + x2) TukeyHSD(result_aov) diff lwr upr p adj b-a 0.845 0.5861098 1.1038902 0.0000001 c-a 0.790 0.5311098 1.0488902 0.0000002 c-b -0.055 -0.3138902

Hi, I am fairly new to R and still trying to figure out how it all works, and I have run into a few issues. I apologize in advance if my questions are a bit basic, I'm also no statistics wizard, so part of my problem my be a more fundamental lack of knowledge in the field. I have a dataset that looks something like this: Week Subj Group Readout 0 1 A 352.2 1 1 A

Hi there, Is there a function that can do a Fisher's LSD multiple comparisons in a two-way ANOVA? I hope to get a result similar with TukeyHSD(). Especially, I hope to know the significance of comparisons between the interactions of two factors. In the following example: x <- c(76, 84, 78, 80, 82, 70, 62, 72, 71, 69, 72, 74, 66, 74, 68, 66, 69, 72, 72, 78, 74, 71, 73, 67, 86, 67, 72,

Hi R users, I google the website and I found that there are three ways to perform repeated measure ANOVA: aov, lme and lmer. http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch/msg58502.html But the questions are which one is good to use and how to do post-hoc test? I use the example that is provided in the above link and I try > tt<-aov(p.pa~group*time+Error(subject/time),data=P.PA)