similar to: offset in survreg

I am trying to fit a lognormal distribution to a set of data and test its goodness of fit with regard to predicted values. I managed to get so far: > y <- c(2,6,2,3,6,7,6,10,11,6,12,9,15,11,15,8,9,12,6,5) > library(MASS) > fitdistr(y,"lognormal",start=list(meanlog=0.1,sdlog=0.1)) meanlog sdlog 1.94810515 0.57091032 (0.12765945) (0.09034437) But I would

Full_Name: Anthony Gichangi Version: 1.90 OS: Windows XP Pro Submission from: (NULL) (130.225.131.206) The function rlnorm generates negative values for lognormal distribution. x- rlnorm(1000, meanlog = 0.6931472, sdlog = 1) Regards Anthony

Hi R lovers! I'd like to know how to use the parameter 'start' in the function fitdistr() obviously I have to provide the initial value of the parameter to optimize except in the case of a certain set of given distribution Indeed according to the help file for fitdistr " For the following named distributions, reasonable starting values will be computed if `start'

Hello, I tried to fit a lognormal distribution by using optim. But sadly the output seems to be incorrect. Who can tell me where the "bug" is? test = rlnorm(100,5,3) logL = function(parm, x,...) -sum(log(dlnorm(x,parm,...))) start = list(meanlog=5, sdlog=3) optim(start,logL,x=test)$par Carsten. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

rlnorm takes two 'shaping' parameters: meanlog and sdlog. meanlog would appear from the documentation to be the log of the mean. eg if the desired mean is 1 then meanlog=0. So to generate random values that fit a lognormal distribution I would do this: rlnorm(N , meanlog = log(mean) , sdlog = log(sd)) But when I check the mean I don't get it when sdlog>0. Interestingly I

Dear All I am trying to replicate a numerical application (not computed on R) from an article. Using, ks.test() I computed the exact D value shown in the article but the p-values I obtain are quite different from the one shown in the article. The tests are performed on a sample of 37 values (please see "[0] DATA" below) for truncated Exponential, Pareto and truncated LogNormal

Hola Ruben, Sí precisamente es lo que comentas, en matemáticas no se suele llamar bucketización (este término se emplea más en informática) sino datos agrupados. Pero la idea es la que tu mismo dices. Respecto a las gráficas que has puesto, me han aclarado mucho sobre el tema, gracias. Si realizo lo mismo, por ejemplo con nbucket=1000 sigo obteniendo un p-valor de 1. Es decir, que casi le

Dear all, Is there a way to generate K numbers of integer (K = 10^6). The maximum value of the integer is 200,000 and minimum is 1. And the occurrences of this integer follows a lognormal distribution. - Gundala Viswanath Jakarta - Indonesia

Dear R-helpers, I was testing the truncgof CRAN package, found something that looked like a bug, and did my job: contacted the maintainer. But he did not reply, so I am resending my query here. I installed package truncgof and run the example for function ad.test. I got the following output: set.seed(123) treshold <- 10 xc <- rlnorm(100, 2, 2) # complete sample xt <- xc[xc >=

The density of a lognormal should be 0 for negative arguments, but > dlnorm(-1) [1] NaN Warning message: NaNs produced in: dlnorm(x, meanlog, sdlog, log) A simple fix is to change dlnorm's definition to: function (x, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1, log = FALSE) .Internal(dlnorm(x*(x>0), meanlog, sdlog, log)) It might be faster to put the same sort of adjustment into the internal code, but

Hi all, this might be a stupid question, but still. Everytime i find some new function it's prettty easy to understand how to use the syntax and to perform a text. Even the general idea of what the function does is pretty easy to understand, but i can not find an explanation (detailed explanation) of the R output for each function. For example, a function fitdistr() in MASS package i

Hi R lovers Here is a numerical vector test > test [1] 206 53 124 112 92 77 118 75 48 176 90 74 107 126 99 84 114 147 99 114 99 84 99 99 99 99 99 104 1 159 100 53 [33] 132 82 85 106 136 99 110 82 99 99 89 107 99 68 130 99 99 110 99 95 153 93 136 51 103 95 99 72 99 50 110 37 [65] 102 104 92 90 94 99 76 81 109 91 98 96 104 104 93 99 125 89

Dear R-Helpers: I have tried everything I can think of and hope not to appear too foolish when my error is pointed out to me. I have some real data (18 points) that look linear on a log-log plot so I used them for a comparison of lm() and survreg. There are no suspensions. survreg.df <- data.frame(Cycles=c(2009000, 577000, 145000, 376000, 37000, 979000, 17420000, 71065000, 46397000,

I am trying to fit a lognormal distribution on interval-censored data. Some of my intervals have a lower bound of zero. Unfortunately, it seems like survreg() cannot deal with lower bounds of zero, despite the fact that plnorm(0)==0 and pnorm(-Inf)==0 are well defined. Below is a short example to reproduce the problem. Does anyone know why survreg() must behave that way? Is there an alternate

Mich besch?ftig folgende Fragestellung. Ich kenne die Verteilung (lognormal) zus?tzlich weiss ich das 99%, das 90% und das 1% Quantil. Gibt es in R eine M?glichkeit die Lognormalverteilung zu finden, das heisst den korrespondierenden logmean und logsd? Vielen Dank f?r ihre Hilfe Gruss Yvonne

Tom Cohen <tom.cohen78@yahoo.se> skrev: Thanks Prof Brian for your suggestion. I should know that for right-skewed data, one should generate the samples from a lognormal. My problem is that x and y are two instruments that were thought to be measured the same thing but somehow show a wide confidence interval of the difference between the two intruments.This may be true that these

Hi list, Does anyone know the code behind rlnorm(n, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1)? I am going to write it in c#. thanks Alireza [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R-user: I am using survreg(Surv()) for fitting a Tobit model of left-censored longitudinal data. For logarithmic transformation of y data, I am trying use survreg.distributions in the following way: tfit=survreg(Surv(y, y>=-5, type="left")~x + cluster(id), dist="gaussian", data=y.data, scale=0, weights=w) my.gaussian<-survreg.distributions$gaussian

Hi! I 've a problem to have a lognorm distribution with mean=1 and var (or sigma)=1. rlnorm(1000,0,0) rlnorm(1000,1,1) rlnorm(1000,0,1) .... ? Can you help me?

Dear all, I have a code that generates data vectors within R. For example assume: z <- rlnorm(1000, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1) Every time a vector has been generated I would like to export it into a csv file. So my idea is something as follows: for (i in 1:100) { z <- rlnorm(1000, meanlog = 0, sdlog = 1) write.csv(z, "c:/z_i.csv") Where "z_i.csv" is a filename that is