similar to: Problem to sort factor

Hello, I'm currently using a boxplot to visualize data for three different models. As I have three models, I'm plotting three parallel boxplots for each factor. This works fine - what I need now is a line connecting the medians of each boxplot of each model. I want to do this in order to visualize the trend that one of the models exhibit. Basically, I want to plot a curve for each model

I am using NUT 2.6.5 as part of FreeNAS 9.2.0. I am using an APC Smart-UPS 5000 RM DL4 with a AP9619 network management card. NUT properly detects when the UPS goes on battery and initiates a shutdown after the configured time. The problem I have is that I am using a 208V unit on a 240V circuit. That means the normal state for the UPS is "TRIM". NUT doesn't treat that as an on line

On Jan 10, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Elliot Dierksen wrote: > I am using NUT 2.6.5 as part of FreeNAS 9.2.0. I am using an APC Smart-UPS > 5000 RM DL4 with a AP9619 network management card. NUT properly detects > when the UPS goes on battery and initiates a shutdown after the configured > time. The problem I have is that I am using a 208V unit on a 240V circuit. > That means the normal

Hi, I'm running this command: # upsrw -s "battery.date=2013Jun7" -u ups-mon-IT "IT-APC-BOTTOMRIGHT at 127.0.0.1" Password: OK but I'm getting this listing: # upsc IT-APC-BOTTOMRIGHT at 127.0.0.1 battery.alarm.threshold: 0 battery.charge: 100.0 battery.charge.restart: 15 battery.date: 01/10/06 battery.packs: 000 battery.runtime: 1440 battery.runtime.low: 120

Hi, One of my APC devices reports: "unacceptable utility voltage rate of change". I believe it has something to do with input voltage fluctuating too fast maybe even beneath or over the input voltage thresholds. Should I worry about this? should I measure input voltage? (I suppose I'd need more than multimeter readings. Maybe an oscilloscope or a multimeter that can record

On Feb 4, 2014, at 10:48 PM, Elliot Dierksen wrote: > NUT will complain endlessly about communication errors and never establish SNMP communication with my APC UPS Hmm, at first glance, I read the "complain endlessly" part as a figure of speech, and figured SNMP would get there eventually since it's UDP. But if you have to stop and restart NUT, that is a different story. What

I am running NUT as part of FreeNAS 9.2.0. I have looked through the manuals, but I don't see how to address my issue. The box has 4 NIC's in a LACP LAGG group. It takes a while for LACP to finish, and NUT tries to start before packets are flowing. NUT will complain endlessly about communication errors and never establish SNMP communication with my APC UPS. If I stop NUT and restart

Hello, I think I found a bug when creating graphics on a PDF device using transparency. I'm using ggplots2 like this: comp <- ggplot(data, aes(x=Problemsize, y=Fitness)) + geom_smooth(fill=alpha("blue", 0.2), aes(colour=factor(Clustersize)), size=2) Which gives me a curve for each "Clustersize" with a transparent blue "cloud" around it, indication

Hi, I have two types of UPS devices and one of them (APC) gave me a false "low battery" alert. I can't reproduce the problem... Also, there was nothing apparently wrong with the UPS at the time of the false alert. All I could do was grab the driver values within a minute after the "low battery" notification. These are the values: battery.runtime.low : 120

> On Jan 10, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Elliot Dierksen wrote: >> I am using NUT 2.6.5 as part of FreeNAS 9.2.0. I am using an APC >> Smart-UPS >> 5000 RM DL4 with a AP9619 network management card. NUT properly detects >> when the UPS goes on battery and initiates a shutdown after the >> configured >> time. The problem I have is that I am using a 208V unit on a 240V

Björn Pettersson A <bjorn.a.pettersson at ericsson.com> writes: > In the new monorepo UC1 may or may not be a parent to UL1. > We could actually have something like this: > > UL4->UC2->UL3->UL2->UL1->UL0->UC1 > > Our DL1 commit should preferably have UL1 as parent after > conversion > > UL4->UC2->UL3->UL2->UL1->UL0->UC1 >

Björn Pettersson A <bjorn.a.pettersson at ericsson.com> writes: > In llvm (split) we have: > > UL4->UL3->UL2->UL1->UL0 > \ > ...->DL2->DL1 > > In clang (split) we have: > > UC4->UC3->UC2->UC1->UC0 > \ > ...->DC2->DC1 > > > DL1 is a commit that updates the

Dear Colleague I am trying to figure out how to use R to do OLS restricted VECM regression. However, there are some notation I cannot understand. Please tell me what is 'ect', 'sd' and 'LRM.dl1 in the following practice: #OLS retricted VECM regression data(denmark) sjd <- denmark[, c("LRM", "LRY", "IBO", "IDE")] sjd.vecm<-

He all, I've updated the downstream fork zipping tool that I posted about last November [1]. It is much improved in every way. The most important enhancements are: - Does a better job of simplifying history - Handles nested submodules - Will put non-submodule-update content in a subdirectory of the monorepo - Updates tags In addition there are plenty of the requisite bug fixes. The

On 2/5/2014 8:24 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 4, 2014, at 10:48 PM, Elliot Dierksen wrote: > >> NUT will complain endlessly about communication errors and never establish SNMP communication with my APC UPS > Hmm, at first glance, I read the "complain endlessly" part as a figure of speech, and figured SNMP would get there eventually since it's UDP. But if you have

----- Forwarded Message ----- From: vramaiah at neo.tamu.edu To: "bernhard pfaff" <bernhard.pfaff at pfaffikus.de> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 9:03:11 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Use of R for VECM Hello Fellow R'ers I am a new user of R and I am applying it for solving Bi-Variate (Consumption and Output) VECM with Co-Integration (I(1)) with three lags on

Hello!   I estimate vector error correction model (vecm) model. I have only one cointegratio relationship. I write :   joh.vecm.rls <- cajorls(joh.vecm, r=1) The output estimation is : Call: lm(formula = substitute(form1), data = data.mat) Coefficients:                up.d            expl.d        upd.d           r.d      ect1      -1.34e-01   4.55e+02   6.91e+00   2.43e+03 constant 

Hi R users, I'm using the 'bam' function in mgcv to examine trends in a remotely sensed vegetation index. I have one random effect variable, 'cons' (with six levels) which identifies different subjects within this analysis. My model is specified as follows: rm4<-bam(trend~factor(zone)+s(cons,bs="re")+s(year,

Dear all, I am analyzing some data that requires a mixed model. I have been reading Pinheiro and Bates' book, but cannot find the notation to fit the following model: Suppose I have the dataset below. Here I am fitting variable p as a fixed effect, variable h as a random effect and variable t as nested within h. I would like to include the variable j as well as an independent (non-nested)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Estimado Javier, adjunto el grafico retocado con GIMP, borre las lineas que sobran en cada panel. Obviamente, no es la idea hacerlo de este modo, sino con R, pues quiero cambiar el color de la recta y hacer varios otros graficos, cuya edicion manual requeriria mucho tiempo. Espero entiendas mejor mi explicacion ahora. Cada una de esas rectas es un