similar to: taskPR

Hello, I'd like to take a look at how the taskPR package performs on our computational cluster, and this morning I've spend some time trying to do a test install of this package on one of our linux machines. Unfortunately I've been unsuccessful in completing the install, and I wondered if someone could please advise me. As I've noted I working on a linux machine, and it's

All, We are researching approaches to parallel R with the end goal of running R in a distributed manner on a Linux cluster. We expect of course to do some work decomposing our problems to be task-parallel or data-parallel, but wouldn't mind getting an initial boost working with "embarrassingly parallel" code sections and one of the approaches below. Incidentally our environment

I see about 7 different R packages for multi-process parallel programming. Which do you think is the best, most complete, and most robust to pick for general purpose Erlang-style message-passing programming in R, and why? First here's my use case, and then my analysis so far. I often have code whose basic organization looks something like this: 1. Fetch step: For each date, gather up or

on hp-ux 11 i see: $ date;ssh jenny Fri Oct 12 14:44:13 PDT 2001 Last successful login for stevesk: Fri Oct 12 10:45:42 PST8PDT 2001 on pts/2 Last unsuccessful login for stevesk: Mon Sep 24 22:55:53 PST8PDT 2001 Last login: Fri Oct 12 10:45:43 2001 from 172.31.1.53 You have mail. so solaris PAM is different. can other solaris+PAM users confirm this? On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Benn Oshrin wrote:

+1, just tried it from my machine here in the UK, and it took about 8 seconds for me. On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 09:19, Benno Krauss via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Alex, > > I can reproduce the issue. About 5 seconds to load llvm.org< > http://llvm.org>, most other domains load instantly. This is from Germany. > > Benno > Am 03.03.2020 um 10:13

Takes between 5 and 15s from Mountain View (tried from both Comcast and from Google internal network). On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 1:48 AM Stefanos Baziotis via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Same for me in Greece. > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020, 11:42 James Henderson via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> +1, just tried it from my machine

We've added a column at http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_summary.html of test results using the Sun Studio compiler: it is intended that these will be updated weekly. The Sun Studio compiler is that used on Solaris: these runs were on the Linux version. All the other platforms are using gcc 4, so this provides an opportunity for checking for use of gcc-specific features and

Hi all, I'm cross-compiling speex for a GNU/Linux ARM target. I want to compile only the libraries, and not the speex executables. I don't have a libogg cross-compiled, and would prefer the need to have to set it up. Unfortunately: 1/ the speex executables depend on libogg header files, although, the speex executables are only compiled if the libogg header files are available 2/ the

Is there a way of listing the variables contained in a file created with the save() command other than load()ing the file? I have a couple of rather larger files that I would rather not load ... Benno Pütz MPI of Psychiatry Tel: +49+(0)89-30622 222 Kraepelinstr. 2 Fax: +49+(0)89-30622 601 80804 Munich, Germany puetz@mpipsykl.mpg.de [[alternative HTML

Hello, I have a question that I was wondering if anyone had a fairly straightforward answer to: what is the quickest and easiest way to take advantage of the extra cores / processors that are now commonplace on modern machines? And how do I do that in Windows? I realise that this is a complex question that is not answered easily, so let me refine it some more. The type of scripts that I'm

OK, my journey to make lab machines automagically install & update all desirable R packages is nearing an end! The only question I have now is this: How can I control where the system prints the *.Rout file that is created automatically when the R batch program runs. In "man R" I don't find any information about it. When the cron job runs "R_installAll.sh" (see

Hi, At the translationproject there are four more languages available than are included in the 1.42.10 tarball: Danish, Esperanto, Malay, and Ukrainian. Please include these in your next release. Attached patch adds the missing language codes to the po/LINGUAS file. The easiest way to fetch the missing files (and the latest updates) is to run: rsync -Lrtvz

On Thu, May 29, 2014, at 8:33, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > It seems to me that if a message catalog has only 5% of the messages > translated, including them is very likely to result in a poorer user > experience than if everything was left in English. When it's just five percent, yes, that may be more of a nuisance than a help. But when it's ten to twenty percent, and when

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:20:11PM +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > > At the translationproject there are four more languages available > than are included in the 1.42.10 tarball: Danish, Esperanto, Malay, > and Ukrainian. Please include these in your next release. I deliberately didn't include some of these because the number of translated messages were pathetic. Danish has

Dear all, I've been trying to find how to compare tow different heatmaps but I'm having trouble getting the colors bar to be the same. I'm doing something like the following: library(gplots) dat<-cor(matrix(rnorm(100, m=10), nrow=10)) mat<-cor(matrix(rnorm(100), nrow=10)) dev.new() heatmap.2(mat, Rowv=NA, Colv=NA, col=redgreen(75), symm=TRUE, trace="none",

Hello, I am adding to an LLVM pass that requires a filename as input. I am able to input this filename as a command line argument when I invoke this pass using opt, but I ultimately need to pass this argument to my code when I compile code with clang. How can I pass this argument to clang so that I can use it in my LLVM pass? Thanks for your help! Best, Shishir Jessu -------------- next part

Colleagues Running R2.2.1 on either a Linux (RedHat 9) or Mac (10.4) platform. I created a PDF document using pdf("FILENAME.pdf", bg="transparent", version="1.4"). I then imported the graphic into PowerPoint - background was set to a non-transparent color. I was hoping that the inserted graphic would be transparent - instead, it had a white background.

I upgraded from Fedora Core 4 to Fedora Core 5 and I find a lot of previously installed packages won't run because shared libraries or other system things have changed "out from under" the installed R libraries. I do not know for sure if the R version now from Fedora-Extras (2.2.1) is exactly the same one I was using in FC4. I see problems in many packages. Example, Hmisc: unable

Hi Jean-Marc, Not exactly. Under cross-compiling you circumvent this standard way by blindly assuming that it is present. That's what I recall. Patch we used to fix this is attached. On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 08:31, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > The way the libogg check is actually not something that's under my > control. It's installed on the

Hello list, When using the grid package in R 1.60 under windows grid.lines and grid.line.to seem not to use the coordinate system as defined by the current viewport whereas grin.points does. Am I doing something wrong? Sten -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send