similar to: Memory management

Happy 2013! Can someone with more knowledge of edge case scoping/eval rules explain what is happening below? Happens in all the versions of R I have on hand. Behavior itself is confusing, but ?as.environment also provides no clue. The term used in that doc is 'search list', which is ambiguous, but the see also section mentions search(), so I would *think* that is what is intended.

On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > The LLVM passes are responsible to take appropriate actions based on > Function > Notes associated with function definition. For example, > > define void @fn1() notes("opt-size=1") { ... } > > The function fn1() is being optimized for size without losing > significant > performance. The inliner will

Here is a proposal that I mentioned sometime ago. Any thoughts,comments or suggestions on this proposal would be appreciated. - Devang // = = =---------------------------------------------------------------------- ===// // Function Notes (or Traits) // = = =---------------------------------------------------------------------- ===// This document describes the

All, I'm working on an improvement to the inline cost model, but I'm unsure how to proceed. Let me begin by first describing the problem I'm trying to solve. Consider the following pseudo C code: *typedef struct element { unsigned idx; } element_t; * *static inline unsigned char fn2 (element_t *dst_ptr, const element_t *a_ptr, const element_t *b_ptr,

Hi R-users, Does R has a topic on newton's method? Thank you for the info.

Hi, Coincidentally I've been working to optimize this same case last week. I was struggling a bit to determine where to put this functionality and eventually went for the pragmatic approach of creating an experimental pass. Probably not the eventual solution, but it may provide some useful input to the discussion here. Basically, I experimented with a 'pre-inlining-transform' pass

On 8/4/2017 2:06 PM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > A few notes: > I'm a bit surprised IPO copy/constant propagation doesn't get this > case, but i didn't look if the lattice supports variables. > In particular, in your example, given no other call sites, it should > eliminate the dead code. > (In a real program, it may require cloning). In the actual program

On Aug 25, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > > On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > >> The LLVM passes are responsible to take appropriate actions based >> on Function >> Notes associated with function definition. For example, >> >> define void @fn1() notes("opt-size=1") { ... } >> >> The function fn1() is being

I just tested Samba 4.9.2 on one of my DCs, previously running version 4.8.6. Immediately after install, I ran "samba-tool dbcheck" and got the following: Checking 511 objects ERROR(<type 'exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError'>): uncaught exception - 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 25: ordinal not in range(128)   File

Hello, we have 2 DC with Sernet Samba-packages 4.9.4 if we do a "samba-tool dbcheck" we get the following error: ---------- samba-tool dbcheck Checking 1631 objects ERROR(<type 'exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError'>): uncaught exception - 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 29: ordinal not in range(128) File

Thank you Rowland for that reply, even if answer to Q2 is not a list of deplicated attributes but the schema which contains all attributes. To answer you: I'm trying to understand. I'm currently working for one company to help them design an AD hosted by Samba. I won't be there to manage it and they already have peoples working with LDAP trees, these coming with their own habits. I

Hi Craig, Thanks for the information. Can you point to the source that specifies tGPR to be R0 - R7? I tried to search in ARMInstrThumb.td but couldn’t find it. Thanks, - Jie On Apr 14, 2019, at 15:28, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com<mailto:craig.topper at gmail.com>> wrote: I believe there is probably a separate instruction in LLVM for thumb2 add. Probably starting with t2

I decided to give Samba 4.9.x a new try as AD DC in one of my servers. It has been running version 4.8.9. I installed version 4.9.4 and when I ran samba-tool dbcheck I still obtained the following error message: ERROR(<type 'exceptions.UnicodeDecodeError'>): uncaught exception - 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 25: ordinal not in range(128)   File

On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 17:37 -0500, Matthew Delfino via samba wrote: > > > > I’m having a similar problem. I just fixed a bad member of my samba > domain - an samba AD DC that wasn’t working. I demoted it, > uninstalled Samba and reinstalled, then rejoined the domain. > > Everything's replicating nicely. All my users can authenticate. But > my samba AD DCs are all

On Fri, 2016-04-15 at 00:32 +0100, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > Thank you Andrew, really appreciated. > > I have now run 'samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix' and it has > successfully fixed some errors; there were 110 previously, however > there are still 69 remaining after a second pass of dbcheck --fix. > > The remaining errors seem to be mainly of this form: >

> Get rid of samba3 by demoting it again as you did last time, search > through sam.ldb for any mention of samba3 and samba4 (you will > probably have to use '--cross-ncs' with ldbsearch or lbdedit), then > remove them. > Now start again with a new DC, but this time, call it anything but > samba3 or samba4. Getting worse and worse .... I demoted samba3 and then also

Hi Louis, Am 28.02.2019 12:47, schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Hai Stefan, > > See. > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13616 > That's what I found, too. We did not do an update it's a fresh installation (migrate from samb3 with classicupgrade). I now did a "samba-tool dbcheck -v " and I see that the "ü" in the DN of a OU it's the

dpkg -l |grep ldb You want to see : libldb1 I think its 1.4.3 you will see, thats the version im having also atm. The bugnr is not in the release notes, so i expect this in the next release to be corrected. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stefan Kania via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 28

Hi Devang, I have a few questions below. On Aug 22, 2008, at 4:40 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > Here is a proposal that I mentioned sometime ago. Any > thoughts,comments or > suggestions on this proposal would be appreciated. > - > Devang > > // > = > = > = > ----------------------------------------------------------------------= > ==// > //

I'm trying to write a simple function that does the following: [command] xify(5.2) [output] XXX.XX [command] xify(3) [output] XXX Any simple solutions (without using python/perl/unix script/...)? Thanks, Saghir --------------------------------------------------------- Legal Notice: This electronic mail and its attachments are i...{{dropped}}