similar to: missing -> nonmissing levels

Dear list member, My question is related to input file format to an Anova from car package. Here is an example of what I did: My file format is like this (and I dislike the idea that I will need to recode it): Hormone day Block Treatment Plant Diameter High N.Leaves SH 23 1 1 1 3.19 25.3 2 SH 23 1 1 2 3.42 5.5 1 SH 23 1 2 1 2.19 5.2 2 SH 23 1 2 2 2.17 7.6 2 CH 23 1 1 1 3.64 6.5 2 CH 23 1 1 2

Hi see in line > -----Original Message----- > From: R-help [mailto:r-help-bounces at r-project.org] On Behalf Of Courtney > Benjamin > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:55 AM > To: r-help at r-project.org > Subject: [R] Creating New Variable Using Ifelse > > Hello R Help List, > > I am an R novice and trying to use the ifelse function to create a new binary >

Suppose you fit a linear model > model.1 ~ lm(v1 ~ ..., data=myframe) and v2 is some other column of myframe typically not in the model. You will often want to try > plot(v2, model.1$residuals) but this will fail if there are NAs in the response v1 as model.1$residuals has length equal to the number of nonmissing values in v1. I suppose > plot(v2[!is.na(v1)],

Hi all, I have to recode some values in a dataset. for example changing all zeros to "." or 999 would be also ok. does anybody know how to do this? thanks in advance. lars -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-R--Replacing-values-tf2841687.html#a7934402 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hi all, Based upon an exchange with G?ran Brostr?m on R-Help today: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2016-February/435992.html there appears to be a bug in summary.data.frame() in the case where a data frame contains Date class columns that contain NA's and other columns, if present, do not. Example, modified from R-Help: x <- c(18000000, 18810924, 19091227, 19027233, 19310526,

There is a problem when importing an spss-file containing explicitly declared missing values in R using the read.spss function from the foreign package. I'm not sure these problems are the same in every version of spss, I am using the latest version 16.0.2. I included http://www.nabble.com/file/p18776776/missingdata.sav missingdata.sav and

I am trying to recode a variable into another variable and while the package 'car' works well when it is only recoding A into B, I am not sure I can do the same with recoding (A or C) into B. If i can use recode please advise on how to. So i am using an if/else if conditions. My sample dataset is below along with the code and the warning and results i get. TIA Krishnan #****Code****

Hello R Help List, I am an R novice and trying to use the ifelse function to create a new binary variable based off of the responses of two other binary variables; NAs are involved. I pulled it off almost successfully, but when I checked the counts of my new variable for accuracy, I found that a small portion of the NA cases were not being passed through as NAs, but as "0" counts in my

Dear R-helpers, Happy New Year to all the helpful members of the list. Here is the behavior I'm looking for: > v1 <- c("a","b","c") > n1 <- c(0, 1, 2) > v2 <- c("c", "a", "b") > n2 <- c(0, 1 , 2) > (f1 <- data.frame(v1, n1)) v1 n1 1 a 0 2 b 1 3 c 2 > (f2 <- data.frame(v2, n2))

I find it's just great to be able to say: library(tseries) x <- get.hist.quote(instrument="ongc.ns") and it gets a full time-series of the stock price of the symbol ongc.ns from Yahoo quote. However, once my hopes have been raised by such beauty :-) I get disappointed when I do > plot(x) and the annotation is horrible! The x axis is not labelled as dates. The default

Greetings Everybody: I generated a 1.2MB dta file based on the general social survey with Stata8 for linux. The file can be re-opened with Stata, but when I bring it into R, it says all the values are missing for most of the variables. This dataset is called "morgen.dta" and I dropped a copy online in case you are interested http://www.ku.edu/~pauljohn/R/morgen.dta looks like this

I have a case where I would like to change multiple columns containing numbers to factors. I can change each column one at a time as in: TEMP.FACT$EXPOS01<-factor(TEMP.FACT$EXPOS01,levels=c(1,2,3),labels=c("No ne","Low Impact","MedHigh Imp")) TEMP.FACT$EXPOS02<-factor(TEMP.FACT$EXPOS02,levels=c(1,2,3),labels=c("No ne","Low

An Sweave file, 'test.Rnw': \documentclass{article} \title{Sweave minimal} \author{MK} \begin{document} \maketitle We try Sweave: <<1>>= data(airquality) summary(airquality) x <- airquality[1, 1] @ I try Sexpr: \Sexpr{x} We plot: \begin{center} <<2, fig=TRUE, echo=FALSE >>= boxplot(Ozone ~ Month, data = airquality) @ \end{center} \end{document} I check the

Greetings all, Ran into a strange problem with the krige function from geoR. The problem that I am having is that while the krige function seems to work well, the resulting predicted values are all NAs. Given the size of the datasets I am working with can't attach it, but I can provide snippets of the datasets. > casedata station year month day obs mpe bias type

Working with 5 subset streams from my source data frame, three of them successfully call dcast(), but two fail: jerritt.cast <- dcast(jerritt.melt, site + sampdate ~ param) Aggregation function missing: defaulting to length and winters.cast <- dcast(winters.melt, site + sampdate ~ param) Aggregation function missing: defaulting to length Yet both data frames have the values in their

If I use latex(summary(X)) where X is a data frame with four variables I get something like Rainfall Education Popden Nonwhite Min. :10.00 Min. : 9.00 Min. :1441 Min. : 0.80 1st Qu.:32.75 1st Qu.:10.40 1st Qu.:3104 1st Qu.: 4.95 Median :38.00 Median :11.05 Median :3567 Median :10.40 Mean :37.37 Mean :10.97 Mean :3866

I wonder if this is an intentional feature or an oversight. in some column summaries or in ifelse operations, apparently I am losing the date property of my vector. > a <- c(198012, 198101, 198102) > b <- a*100+31 > c <- as.Date( as.character(b), "%Y%m%d" ) > summary(c) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.

Consider > summary(1:5) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 1 2 3 3 4 5 > summary(c(1:5,NA)) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's 1 2 3 3 4 5 1 Wouldn't it be more stringent if "NA's" was also reported in the first case?? Regards S?ren

I have a binary file(a) with size of (360 720 )for the globe.I wrote the code given below to read and extract an area (south america)from that file. when I use summary for the whole file I got: summary(a, na.rm=FALSE) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's 0.00 1.00 3.00 4.15 7.00 20.00 200083 . But when I used summary for the region(b) which I extracted, I got

Hi, when I use use subset in a data.frame, all empty levels are maintained in the new table. > test <- data.frame(a=as.factor(rep(c("f1","f2","f3"),10)),b=rep(c(1,2,3),10)) > summary(test) a b f1:10 Min. :1 f2:10 1st Qu.:1 f3:10 Median :2 Mean :2 3rd Qu.:3 Max. :3 > test2 <-