similar to: Rmpi help

I'm running my script using mpirun -mp 4 and using snowfall+Rmpi on Linux 64bits. I receive the following error, but apparently without consequences on the results. Any idea? I'm able to reproduce it with a minimal script (below). Seems the critical issue is the for loop. Without it no error. Thanks for your help! TERM: Undefined variable. TERM: Undefined variable. TERM: Undefined

Sorry for wasting your time with an incorrect diagnosis in my previous mail! I'm running my script using mpirun -mp 4 and using snowfall+Rmpi on Linux 64bits. I receive the following error, that terminates the run. Any idea? I'm able to reproduce the problem with a minimal script (below). If n < 16371 it completes 9 iterations without problems. Already at 16371 it dies at iteration 7

Hi Could you suggest where I can download a samba-2.2.6 or samba-2.2.9 rpm for Redhat Linux v7.1. I am presently using a samba-2.2.3a server but Windows XP clients create extra files when saving or copying to this samaba server. Best regards, Gary Marshall e-Protector Tel: 0870 0278302 Mob: 07769 747080 Fax: 0115 9227111 **********************************************************************

On 4/7/20 11:54 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote: > I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. > > I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: > > 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 > 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]:

Hello, I don't know if the question pertains to Rmpi, snow or snowfall. I run my job by: mpirun -np N -hostfile $PBS_NODEFILE RMPISNOW -f my-script.r --slave In the snowfall sfInit call I have to specify one less CPU respect to the mpirun call sfInit(parallel=TRUE, cpus=N-1, type="MPI") otherwise I receive an error similar to: "cluster size N-1 already

pthread_mutex_lock had *better* imply a compiler barrier across which code can't be moved... which is very different from the printf case where it might have done it due to register pressure or who knows what. If code like x = *a; pthread_mutex_lock or unlock or __memory_barrier() y = *a; doesn't cause a to get loaded twice, then the compiler's in serious trouble. Basically

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:38 AM Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco at xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Hi all, > Hi Hans. > The patches in this series can be applied independently from each other. > > If you maintain one of these drivers and you want to merge it for v5.4 > yourself, then please do so and let me know. If you prefer I commit it > to drm-misc, then please review and

I have fail2ban on my mail server monitoring Dovecot and Exim. I have noticed that it has stopped banning IP's. I have seen in /var/log/fail2ban.log: 2020-04-07 09:42:05,875 fail2ban.filter [16138]: INFO [dovecot] Found 77.40.61.224 - 2020-04-07 09:42:05 2020-04-07 09:42:06,408 fail2ban.actions [16138]: NOTICE [dovecot] Ban 77.40.61.224 2020-04-07 09:42:06,981

So you're saying a compiler can optimize: > > - statement with memory access > - read memory barrier > - statement with memory access > > To drop the second statement? I would worry about your definition of > memory barrier then.. > This is tricky, but I think you're mixing up the general case with the actual code you have. In general, you are pointing to this

My LAN is running Samba v2.0.10 on RedHat Linux v7.1 and everything is running great. Not content to leave well enough alone, we will soon be converting all the Win98 clients to Win2K. What kind of Samba-related difficulties, if any, should I expect? Samba exports both shared drives and printers to the client machine on the Network. Client machines are given access to their home drives as

I was wondering if there is an answer to this challenge or if I just have to live with it? I'm a bit of a Newbie here. I'm in the process of setting up Samba -2.2.2 on a Redhat v7.1 (Seawolf) server. I've discovered that joining the NT Domain is a simple matter of smbpasswd -j DOMAIN_NAME smbpasswd picks up the PDC name from smb.conf and moves right along. There is no need to

FYI for anyone using the dual ethernet ports on a Cisco 7960. I'm using a Cisco 7960 connected to an HP2524 10/100 switch, which has an asterisk box connected directly to it. No VLANs defined or in use. Measured bandwidth: PC -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual throughput measured at 94.1 mbps. PC -> 7960 -> HP Switch -> Asterisk : actual measured at 93.02 mbps. The

Am 2017-09-19 09:36, schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: > Hi, > > I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox > CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my > own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. > > In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or > Nextcloud on a RHEL/CentOS

Hi Dariusz, Hans, I can apply the dw-hdmi patches if necessary. Neil On 19/08/2019 11:38, Hans Verkuil wrote: > Hi all, > > The patches in this series can be applied independently from each other. > > If you maintain one of these drivers and you want to merge it for v5.4 > yourself, then please do so and let me know. If you prefer I commit it > to drm-misc, then please

Hi all, The patches in this series can be applied independently from each other. If you maintain one of these drivers and you want to merge it for v5.4 yourself, then please do so and let me know. If you prefer I commit it to drm-misc, then please review and (hopefully) Ack the patch. I would really like to get this in for v5.4 so I can get the userspace bits in for v5.4 as well through the

Hello NG, found a thread with almost my current problem. There wasn't any solution out there. Maybe anything has changed? I want install samba v3.0.9 on an old rh linux v7.1. Currently there's no chance to update the core system. But while compiling it breaks with many "vfs"-errors as shown below: ..SNIP.. modules/vfs_shadow_copy.po(.text+0x6e2): undefined reference to

Using Samba v2.0.10 on a RedHat v7.1 box, I see that the Win98 clients on our network are making sporatic requests for user "nobody" (as shown below). Anyone know what's going on here? My network has both Linux and Win98 clients, but only the Win98 clients are showing this behavior. Both the Linux and Win98 clients access the same shared drives, but only the Win98 clients use

Thanks for your help. Is there possible I can get the realily case value form the MI? For the case in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34902. as follows. ############################# * GCC v7.1 generated assembly ############################# ** Options: -Os -marm -march=armv7-a foo: @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0 @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0 sub

> Maybe there is a better place to post this message but as my question > was still CentOS related thought I would start here. Please advise if > there is a better forum of which to ask this question. > > I am playing around with making a "desktop" workstation out of a > Raspberry PI3. I have had no problems installing the OS and pretty much > have everything working

Cisco has version 7.1 of their SIP firmware for the 79x0 phones. They advertise "no new software features", but it does include bugfixes for a number of things. I know there was a discussion about the 0.4sec delay, which is said to be resolved in this firmware (CSCed48311: Media takes 0.4 sec to be set up) Steve