similar to: Comparing models in multiple regression and hierarchical linear regression

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Comparing models in multiple regression and hierarchical linear regression"

2015 Jan 26
4
imap-login: Fatal: pipe() failed: Too many open files
Hi I keep on getting errors and can't connect/login to Dovecot. I did my research but unfortunately without success. It is for sure not ulimit because ulimit is set to unlimited per default already. Still , it complains about "Too many open files" but this is a test system and the service dovecot and postfix have just been started. No one except me is testing on this system.
2015 Jan 26
1
imap-login: Fatal: pipe() failed: Too many open files
I also keep on getting funny errors of dovecot EVEN THOUGH I authenticated successfully through SMTP (Dovecto SASL) ?!?! Just for debugging this entire issue I set those parameters: debug_level = -1 auth_verbose = yes auth_verbose_passwords = yes auth_debug = yes auth_debug_passwords = yes mail_debug = yes verbose_ssl = yes cat /var/loca/maillog Jan 26 12:08:22 WM-01
2007 May 24
1
how do I revert back from ZFS partitioned disk to original partitions
I accidentally created a zpool on a boot disk, it paniced the system and now I can jumpstart and install the OS on it. This is what it looks like. partition> p Current partition table (original): Total disk sectors available: 17786879 + 16384 (reserved sectors) Part Tag Flag First Sector Size Last Sector 0 usr wm 34 8.48GB
2011 Mar 04
13
cannot replace c10t0d0 with c10t0d0: device is too small
In 2007 I bought 6 WD1600JS 160GB sata disks and used 4 to create a raidz storage pool and then shelved the other two for spares. One of the disks failed last night so I shut down the server and replaced it with a spare. When I tried to zpool replace the disk I get: zpool replace tank c10t0d0 cannot replace c10t0d0 with c10t0d0: device is too small The 4 original disk partition tables look like
2010 Feb 18
2
Killing an EFI label
Since this seems to be a ubiquitous problem for people running ZFS, even though it''s really a general Solaris admin issue, I''m guessing the expertise is actually here, so I''m asking here. I found lots of online pages telling how to do it. None of them were correct or complete. I think. I seem to have accomplished it in a somewhat hackish fashion, possibly not
2010 Apr 16
1
cannot set property for ''rpool'': property ''bootfs'' not supported on EFI labeled devices
I am getting the following error, however as you can see below this is a SMI label... cannot set property for ''rpool'': property ''bootfs'' not supported on EFI labeled devices # zpool get bootfs rpool NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE rpool bootfs - default # zpool set bootfs=rpool/ROOT/s10s_u8wos_08a rpool cannot set property for ''rpool'': property
2008 May 30
1
Aggregation and the meaning of class
Dear R-ers, My aggregation saga continues. Using the following sequence, I can calculate any statistic for row groups and merge the result back to all associated rows ... > WM = by( D60, D60[ "KeyProfA"], FUN=function(x) weighted.mean( x$IAC, x$Wt)) > D60$IAC.WM = as.numeric( WM[ D60$KeyProfA]) > class( WM) [1] "by" Questions ... 1) Is this a reasonable way
2004 Jul 20
1
Accuracy in summary (PR#7121)
Full_Name: Sanford Weisberg Version: 1.9.1 OS: Win XP Submission from: (NULL) (160.94.148.2) > wm <- read.table(url("http://www.stat.umn.edu/~sandy/wmdata0.txt"), header=TRUE) > mean(wm$Spd1) [1] 7.7773 > summary(wm$Spd1) Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. 0.222 4.780 7.550 7.780 10.200 21.600 The mean of this variable DOES NOT ROUND to the value
2000 Dec 18
3
problems with glm (PR#771)
R1.2.0 with Linux RH5.2 I do not believe that the problems below are new to 1.2 but I only cover this sort of thing once a year in my course and some of that happened to be last Friday so too late to report for 1.2. I see that one or two things that I was going to report have been corrected. I like the fact that interactions now show : instead of . Here is some output with comments inserted. R
2000 Dec 18
3
problems with glm (PR#771)
R1.2.0 with Linux RH5.2 I do not believe that the problems below are new to 1.2 but I only cover this sort of thing once a year in my course and some of that happened to be last Friday so too late to report for 1.2. I see that one or two things that I was going to report have been corrected. I like the fact that interactions now show : instead of . Here is some output with comments inserted. R
2005 Oct 05
3
testing non-linear component in mgcv:gam
Hi, I need further help with my GAMs. Most models I test are very obviously non-linear. Yet, to be on the safe side, I report the significance of the smooth (default output of mgcv's summary.gam) and confirm it deviates significantly from linearity. I do the latter by fitting a second model where the same predictor is entered without the s(), and then use anova.gam to compare the
2003 Apr 18
1
Help with nlme--freq weights, logit model, and more
Below you will find the output from a failed multi-level model run. I am trying to estimate the following model: Pr(PLFP=1)= logistic regression -> B1_j * bm + B2_j * wm + B3_j bf + B4_j wf + B5 yrsed+ B6 age+ B7 age^2+e_ij B1_j = G01 + G11 bmxd + d1 B2_j = G02 + G12 wmxd + d2 B3_j = G03 + G13 bfxd + d3 B4_j = G04 + G14 wfxd + d4 d1-d4 freely correlated Note that there is no
2006 May 20
1
General compiz questions
I've been using compiz on KDE for a while now and I like the eye candy. Thanks to all who made this possible. I'm usually a no-nonsense guy who doesn't care about eye candy (I'm not even using a background picture because I'm worried about the memory it'll use (on a machine with 2 GB of RAM) :) ) but compiz stormed (sic!) my defences. Now for my questions: 1. compiz is a
2007 Oct 29
9
zpool question
hello folks, I am running Solaris 10 U3 and I have small problem that I dont know how to fix... I had a pool of two drives: bash-3.00# zpool status pool: mypool state: ONLINE scrub: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM mypool ONLINE 0 0 0 emcpower0a ONLINE 0 0 0 emcpower1a ONLINE
2011 May 01
0
[LLVMdev] LoopInfo are not able to identify some natural loops?
On 4/30/11 8:52 AM, Bo Wu wrote: > In C code, if a loop is not a natural loop, that means its loop body > should at least have one label, right? In that case, some BB out of > the loop can jump to the loop body, so the loop has more than on entry. Off the top of my head, I would think you are right: a C label would have to exist within the loop in order to have a jump from outside the
2011 Apr 30
3
[LLVMdev] LoopInfo are not able to identify some natural loops?
In C code, if a loop is not a natural loop, that means its loop body should at least have one label, right? In that case, some BB out of the loop can jump to the loop body, so the loop has more than on entry. Does LoopInfo guarantee to identify all natural loops? This property is very important for my pass. regards, Bo On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Cameron Zwarich <zwarich at
2007 Apr 14
3
LDA problem
Hi, I am using dovecot deliver as lda for sendmail. My problem is that when a user account is over quota, deliver program sends message in the logs, but the message is not bounced back to sender informing that their is disk quota problem at the recipient side. Further message remains in the mail queue. Details are below. Plz suggest how to figure out the problems: 1. Message should be
2010 Jan 13
3
Recovering a broken mirror
We have a production SunFireV240 that had a zfs mirror until this week. One of the drives (c1t3d0) in the mirror failed. The system was shutdown and the bad disk replaced without an export. I don''t know what happened next but by the time I got involved there was no evidence that the remaining good disk (c1t2d0) had ever been part of a ZFS mirror. Using dd on the raw device I can see data
2007 Oct 26
1
Effect sizes
I'm just curious . . . if effect sizes are so important, and possibly a better way of looking at results than p-values, since they don't depend on effect size (Kline,2004; Murphy and Myors, 2004), why don't any of the classical tests, like t.test or glht specified for Tukey's posthocs, return effect sizes? I say "classical" because I'm sure there may be packages out
2011 Dec 08
1
sum of deviations from the weighted mean
Hi all. I tried to calculate sum of deviations from the weighted mean and i didn't get what i expected - 0. Here is an example: > wt <- c(10,25,38,22,5) > x <- 6:10 > wm <- weighted.mean(x,wt) > (x-wm)*wt [1] -18.70 -21.75 4.94 24.86 10.65 > sum((x-wm)*wt) [1] -1.24345e-14 With simple mean I got 0: > sum(x-mean(x)) [1] 0 Could someone explain me why we