similar to: Running wilcox.test function on two lists

Dear all, please consider my following workbook: library(zoo) lis1 <- vector('list', length = 2) lis2 <- vector('list', length = 2) lis1[[1]] <- zooreg(rnorm(20), start = as.Date("2010-01-01"), frequency = 1) lis1[[2]] <- zooreg(rnorm(20), start = as.yearmon("2010-01-01"), frequency = 12) lis2[[1]] <- matrix(1:40, 20) lis2[[2]] <-

Hi all, I generally use the Reduce() function to reduce the dimension of list object. However in my current session I have few objects which are actually list of list of list..(say n step). If I reduce their dimension then I have call Reduce() function many times. Therefore my question is, is there any 1-step way to reduce the dimension at the lowest level? Take this example: lis1 <-

Dear all, I am trying to run Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test with Bonferroni's correction. I have two lists: l0, l1: mapply(function(x,y)wilcox.test(x,y)$p.value, l0, l1) How do I run Bonferroni's correction on mapply? Any help is much apperciated. Thanks, -Raj

Dear List: I am generating N datasets using the following Sigma<-matrix(c(400,80,80,80,80,400,80,80,80,80,400,80,80,80,80,400),4,4 ) mu<-c(100,150,200,250) N=100 for(i in 1:N) { assign(paste("Data.", i, sep=''), as.data.frame(cbind(seq(1:1000),(mvrnorm(n=1000, mu, Sigma))))) } With these datasets, I need to work on some of the variables and then run each dataset

I'm using R on Windows v2.0.1 with the nlme package (v3.1-53) and am finding some unexpected discrepancies in the output of intervals.lme and coef.lme. I've included a toy dataset at the end, but briefly, the data are longitudinal data from couples in marital therapy. Each spouse's relationship satisfaction is measured 4 times; I've fit both linear and quadratic models to the

G'day All, I have 4 DCs on Centos 7.1. Everything was working really well for years, including replication. Then I decided that the OS needed updating. Did the yum update on one of the DCs, rebooted. That server is now running Centos 7.4. Samba seemed to start okay. However, samba-tool drs showrepl gives this error on all 3 of the other DCs, and shows success on the updated DC.

On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: > I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is running smbd and winbindd. > > I've followed the wiki and for the most part it's working. However, after stuffing up the ranges, then fixing them up, when I create new accounts, adding all the

Thanks Carlos, The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I have same problem after update for samba. > I allow new ports in firewall. > >

I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is running smbd and winbindd. I've followed the wiki and for the most part it's working. However, after stuffing up the ranges, then fixing them up, when I create new accounts, adding all the Unix attributes, the UID_Number is not showing the correct value

> > On 24/06/15 02:55, David Minard wrote: >> On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: >> >>> I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are >>> running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is >>> running smbd and winbindd. >>> >>> I've followed the wiki and for the most part

G'day All, I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. See below for named.conf. I'm having two issues. 1) After bind first starts up

On 25/06/15 13:44, David Minard wrote: >> On 24/06/15 02:55, David Minard wrote: >>> On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: >>> >>>> I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are >>>> running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is >>>> running smbd and winbindd.

Thank you Felix. On 02/07/15 16:18, Felix Matouschek wrote: > Hi David, > > I experienced this issue as well, it's currently a limitation of Samba 4.2.2. > Samba 4.2.2 DCs do not support pulling home directories and login shells from AD via rfc2307. > > I solved this issue with the "template homedir" and "template shell" directives. > You lose some

Hello all, I'm new on the list and hope this question isn't out of order. I'm booting Xen with mboot.c32 but with 100mb/s cards. I want to upgrade to 1000mb/s. I haven't got the biggest budget to trial and error new network cards so I'd like to buy the right card first time. I think this can be a bit tricky from 100mb/s card experience. A 3c905CX-TXM (03-0247-000 E)

I've been using the pcaMethods to develop a scores matrix ======================================= data(iris) pcIr <- pca(iris[,1:4], method="nipals", nPcs=3, cv="q2") test <- scores(pcIr) ======================================== What I'm looking to do is to use lattice's barchart to plot the scores something like below, but expanded to all the scores

In a prior life I was able to use slplot can change the xlim and ylim such that the ellipse was a perfect circle. It seems that the xlim and ylim are no longer supported by the slplot function. Any thoughts on how I can change this? Thank you kindly, -------------------------------------------------------------- Shawn Way, PE MECO, Inc. (p) 281-276-7612 (f) 281-313-0248 <img

Magazine: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Date: Nov/Dec 2009 Title: What Your ICH Q8 Design Space Needs: A Multivariate Predictive Distribution Author: Peterson, John J. Company: GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals Summary: Multivariate Predicitive distibution quantifies the level of QA in a design space. "Parametric Bootstrapping" can help simplify early analysis and compliment Bayesian

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

hi, when performing a wilcox.test or a wilcox.exact i get results that looks like this: wilcox.exact(x, mu=.5) Exact Wilcoxon signed rank test data: x V = 207, p-value = 0.0006905 alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0.5 the way i understand the wilcox.test (or wilcox.exact) the V-value represents the summed up ranks of either the positive or negative differences,

Hello: I need to take a species-sample matrix and transpose it to the format used by PC-ORD for analysis. Unfortunately, the number of species is very large (>5000), and so this operation cannot be performed simply in an application like Excel, which has a 255 column limit. So, I wrote relatively simple code in R that I hoped would do this (appended below). But there are glitches. The