similar to: help: trouble using lines()

Hi all, Does anyone have thoughts on extending v->arch.hvm_vcpu.single_step to support pre-MTF systems, in a way that would mimic the MTF? So far I''m emulating PUSHF/POPF to hide the hypervisor''s trap flag, and eventually I''ll multiplex it down to the guest, but I''m having issues. Right now, I''m enabling X86_EFLAGS_TF in vmx_intr_assist, just like

This concerns whether p-values from lmer can be trusted. From simulations, it seems that lmer can produce very small, and probably spurious, p-values. I realize that lmer is not yet a finished product. Is it likely that the problem will be fixed in a future release of the lme4 package? Using simulated data for a quite standard mixed-model anova (a balanced two-way design; see code for the

For block effects with small variance, lmer will sometimes estimate the variance as being very close to zero and issue a warning. I don't have a problem with this -- I've explored things a bit with some simulations (see below) and conclude that this is probably inevitable when trying to incorporate random effects with not very much data (the means and medians of estimates are plausibly

Hello, I am trying to join a third domain controller to an existing Samba 4 domain (sernet samba 4.2.1-17.el6.x86_64) and we're hitting a problem that looks like some bad replication data on certain objects. We get part way through replicating the tree and then it dies on a Sudo Rule object: [root at dc03 ~]# /usr/bin/samba-tool domain join EXAMPLE.COM DC -U Administrator

Dear all, I have some growth curve data from an experiment that I try to fit using lm and lmer. The curves describe the growth of classification accuracy with the amount of training data t, so basically y ~ 0 + t (there is no intercept because y=0 at t0) Since the growth is somewhat nonlinear *and* in order to estimate the treatment effect on the growth curve, the final model is y ~ 0 + t +

Hello I'm working with mixed effects models using lmer() and have some problems to get all variance components of the model's random effects. I can get the variance of the random effect out of the summary and use it for further calculations, but not the variance component of the residual term. Could somebody help me with that problem? Thanks a lot! Below an example. Aline ## EXAMPLE

Hi Henrik, I'm sorry to be bothering you, but there is something that I have been stuck with for a while now. I am trying to create a class like : setConstructorS3("MyPTCM",function(tokenslist=0) { extend(Object(), "MyPTCM", .gamma = 0.0, .rho = 0.0, .phi = 0.0, .tokenslist = tokenslist, .uniquetokens = unique(tokenslist),

Hello, We're using Samba 4.1.11 as domain controllers and over the past two weeks I've run into several issues with unrelated Windows software, the problems of which all point to Kerberos authentication and SPNs as being somehow involved. If there are many more issues it might start to get politically difficult *not* to blame the DCs, and I don't want to point fingers at Samba. Are

Dear all, I was wondering if anyone could help solve a problem of a missing interaction effect!! I carried out a 2 x 2 factorial experiment to see if eggs from 2 different locations (Origin = 1 or 2) had different hatching success under 2 different incubation schedules (Treat = 1 or 2). Six eggs were taken from 10 females (random = Female) at each location and split between the treatments,

Hi all, Two questions: 1. Is there a way to evaluate models from lmer() with a poisson distribution? I get the following error message: library(lme4) lmer(tot.fruit~infl.treat+def.treat+(1|initial.size),family=poisson)->model plot(fitted(model),resid(model)) Error: 'resid' is not implemented yet Are there any other options? 2. Why doesn't the function estimable() in gmodels

Hardware Supermicro X7DAE (AHCI BIOS) dual Intel Woodcrest processors, 6 x Western Digital Raptor SATA drives. I have installed b62 running 64 bit succesfully on a PATA drive. The BIOS is configured to access the SATA drives in native mode using hte AHCI Bios. I have 6 SATA II drives accessed via the Solaris AHCI driver. I have created a ZFS file system across all 6 drives. This works fine until

fixed @ R-forge. New version should appear on CRAN soon. Thanks for the report! Torsten > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 23:56:35 +0200 > From: Ulrich Halekoh <Ulrich.Halekoh at agrsci.dk> > To: "r-help at r-project.org" <r-help at r-project.org> > Subject: [R] glht (multcomp): NA's for confidence intervals using

Hej, Calculation of confidence intervals for means based on a model fitted with lmer using the package multcomp - yields results for calpha=adjusted_calpha - NA's for calpha=univariate_calpha Example: library(lme4) library(multcomp) ### Generate data set.seed(8) d<-expand.grid(treat=1:2,block=1:3) e<-rnorm(3) names(e)<-1:3 d$y<-rnorm(nrow(d)) + e[d$block]

Hello, We are using the account lockout feature in Samba 4.2. Unfortunately my own account is being locked out overnight and I can't figure out where from :-( Is there a level of logging on a Samba4 DC I can use to record the source address of any authentication failures, be they with Kerberos or native LDAP? Thanks, -- Luke Bigum --- LMAX Exchange, Yellow Building, 1A Nicholas Road,

I am trying to use t.test on the following data: date type INTERVAL nCASES MTF SDF MTO SDO nFST MF nOBS MO MB BIASCV BIASEV ME MAE RMSE CRCF 2001-06-15 avn GE1.00 4385 0.246 0.300 1.502 0.556 1367 1.373 4385 1.502 1.471 0.285 0.164 -1.256 1.266 1.399 0.056 2001-06-15 avn

Hello, Quick observation after recently updating all DC's to 4.2.0 from 4.1.17. Several users received the notice "account is currently locked out" after entering their password once. I updated the policy to a minimum of 3 attempts before any user logged in initially. I opened Microsoft ADUC tool and clicked the box to unlock their account. This resulted in the user receiving

Hi James, We use Samba 4.2 DCs and have Linux talking to the DC fine. This is using Kerberos via SSSD on CentOS 6 and various Fedoras - Password expiry works, nested Groups work, Sudo rules and Netgroups can be placed inside the AD tree as well. A combination of the samba-tool command and pdbedit can achieve most things, however you will still need the Windows Management tools to interact with

Hello, I have a namespace / ACL problem with shared mailboxes that I can't figure out. I have a local user tam at crm.yb.lmax that shares it's INBOX and all other folders with on LDAP group. Members of that group can't create a folder under the shared local user's INBOX: [08-Apr-2015 11:43:05 +0000]: [9501] S: * MYRIGHTS tam at crm.yb.lmax lrwstipekxcd [08-Apr-2015 11:43:05

Hi, I've never been a Windows user, but I'm curious to see how the AD integration works in Linux, since it looks like we may need to have one or two Windows desktops and I don't realy want to start setting up Windows infrastructure. If I can have Samba as a domain controller that makes things a lot simpler. I have one question tho, the documentation suggests using the Microsoft

Replying back to the list :-) The Sudoers functionality is achieved by modifing the Samba schema, the sudo package itself distributes the schema change LDIF: $ rpm -ql sudo | grep schema /usr/share/doc/sudo/schema.ActiveDirectory /usr/share/doc/sudo/schema.OpenLDAP /usr/share/doc/sudo/schema.iPlanet Technically if you could find the correct schema to store autofs data in AD then it should work.