similar to: Ruby / Rails / MySQL/ AJAX project, developer needed (Oasis Digital)

Trying to fire up Puppet 0.24.7 on an Ubuntu 6.06 x64 machine (yes, I know it''s obsolete, but we have a pile of machines), I get this failure: ---------------------------- # /etc/init.d/puppet start * Starting puppet configuration management tool /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/shadow.so: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [x86_64-linux] /etc/init.d/puppet: line 35:

I was wooed here by this demo page for the script.aculo.us slider control: http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/SliderDemo ... but I''m looking for a slider control well adapted for use in a touch-screen kiosk application (an unusual place to put a web application, perhaps, but bear with me...) I''ve posted an example (screencast and downloadable program) here:

I started what I thought was going to be a 30 minute project on the train this morning to write a little timetracker for myself. Amongst other things (don''t have a model called Task as it conflicts with Rake at the moment, don''t have a model called Action as it disappears in the hash when you submit a form :-), I had to use Webrick as Lighty complained about an unknown

Hi all, I have just updated our dc's from sernet 4.1.11 to sernet 4.1.12. And suddenly since that update, we're getting many ldapcmp failures on the attribute 'whenChanged'. In 4.1.11 life was good, and ldapcmp reported no differences at all. Here is a sample: (dc2 <-> dc3) Comparing: 'CN=podcast,CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com' [ldap://dc2]

Hi, I am trying to create a tarball from a 4.0.3 git checkout using "make dist", but it throws errors (small sample below, detailed Copy&Paste on request), and apart from this, www.oasis-open.org seems stale on connects from xsltproc, as can be seen in the lsof sample, below as well. Briefly and cheekily asked, is that normal? Are we all omitting docs in packaging at the moment?

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:51:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Host no longer knows the alignment, so why is it needed? > In fact, I notice that 4.3.2.3 Virtqueue Layout seems completely wrong: > it corresponds to legacy devices, and it does not > say what "align" is. I created https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-129 to track this. Can you write up a patch

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:51:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Host no longer knows the alignment, so why is it needed? > In fact, I notice that 4.3.2.3 Virtqueue Layout seems completely wrong: > it corresponds to legacy devices, and it does not > say what "align" is. I created https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/VIRTIO-129 to track this. Can you write up a patch

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 05:15:30PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 17:12 +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:51:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Host no longer knows the alignment, so why is it needed? > > > In fact, I notice that 4.3.2.3 Virtqueue Layout seems completely wrong: > > > it corresponds to

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 05:15:30PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 17:12 +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:51:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Host no longer knows the alignment, so why is it needed? > > > In fact, I notice that 4.3.2.3 Virtqueue Layout seems completely wrong: > > > it corresponds to

*Dear **Madam**/**Sir,* *What would happen if we irrigate the degraded land using the desalinated saline water in Minqin Oasis, Gansu Province, China? Can we prevent the disappearing of Minqin Qasis?* * * *Background:* *1. **The Minqin Oasis is surrounded by two deserts, Badain Jaran Desert and Tengger Desert. * *2. **Water is the root of ecological

i am SURE this is really simple.. and i am SURE i have read this a million times.. but i am not wiring this up in my brain correctly.. if i have a parent class that has fields: Podcasts id title description and a child class like: Episodes id podcast_id title description filename i can get the episode information all day.. but using the "Episode" class, can i access the

On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 17:12 +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:51:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Host no longer knows the alignment, so why is it needed? > > In fact, I notice that 4.3.2.3 Virtqueue Layout seems completely wrong: > > it corresponds to legacy devices, and it does not > > say what "align" is. > > I

On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 17:12 +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 06:51:01PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > Host no longer knows the alignment, so why is it needed? > > In fact, I notice that 4.3.2.3 Virtqueue Layout seems completely wrong: > > it corresponds to legacy devices, and it does not > > say what "align" is. > > I

----- Forwarded message from Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org> ----- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:54:16 -0400 From: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org> To: tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org, members at lists.oasis-open.org, virtio at lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-comment at lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [members] 15-day Public Review for Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO)

----- Forwarded message from Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org> ----- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:54:16 -0400 From: Chet Ensign <chet.ensign at oasis-open.org> To: tc-announce at lists.oasis-open.org, members at lists.oasis-open.org, virtio at lists.oasis-open.org, virtio-comment at lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [members] 15-day Public Review for Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO)

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:38:04PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > Tested with our custom models (*not* qemu). Could you look into updating qemu as well please? I'd like to make sure patches are widely testable before pushing them, to reduce the chances of finding issues after kernel is released. You can find draft patches for pci and s390 here:

On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 18:39 +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:38:04PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > > Tested with our custom models (*not* qemu). > > Could you look into updating qemu as well please? No, sorry. I'm officially not allowed to touch qemu, due to some legal issues. I'll talk to Peter Maydell. Pawe?

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 05:18:23PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 18:36 +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > Well, not quite: as of now I've got legacy block device driver happily > > > > > working on top of compliant (so v2 in MMIO speech) MMIO device - the > > > > > transport if completely transparent here. > >

On Tue, 2015-01-20 at 17:44 +0000, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > Good. But your current code will also try to support a mix: device that > uses the new transport underneath, but old layout and semantics on top. It will not try to support the mix, but rather will not stop it from working. > This has no value: the spec does *not* define such devices > and it also does not match any

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 06:38:04PM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > Tested with our custom models (*not* qemu). Could you look into updating qemu as well please? I'd like to make sure patches are widely testable before pushing them, to reduce the chances of finding issues after kernel is released. You can find draft patches for pci and s390 here: