similar to: - factanal scores correlated?

Hi, i need to test the equality of proportions in a paired case, like here: after before + - + 10 14 - 5 53 So usually i use the mcnemar.test(stats). Due to mortality, I now got the problem that my sample sizes in both factors are not equal any more -- there are less cases in the "after" condition. I already learned that Ekbohm (1982) and Marascuilo adressed the problem

Dear R-List, to assess the model fit for 2PL-models, I tried to mimic the bootstrap-approach chosen in the GoF.rasch()-function. Not being a statistician, I was wondering whether the following simplification (omit the "chi-squared-expressed model fit-step") would be appropriate: GoF.ltm <- function(object, B = 50, ...){ liFits <- list() for(i in 1:B){ rndDat <-

Last Friday, I noticed that it is difficult to work with regression models in which there are factors. It is easier to do the old fashioned thing of coding up "dummy" variables with 0-1 values. The predict function's newdata argument is not suited to insertion of hypothetical values for the factor, whereas it has no trouble with numeric variables. For example, if one uses a

Dear R users Happy New year to all for a start. Below is some data that I ran a factor analysis on. Using $score prints the scores for each of the three factors. However, I would like to access those factors as variable for new computations. How do I do that? In SPSS we just call fact1_1, fact2_1 etc.. Thanks for your suggestions. V ============ v1 <- c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,3,3,3,3,3,4,5,6) v2

Dear Users, I ran factor analysis using R and SAS. However, I had different outputs from R and SAS. Why they provide different outputs? Especially, the factor loadings are different. I did real dataset(n=264), however, I had an extremely different from R and SAS. Why this things happened? Which software is correct on? Thanks in advance, - TY #R code with example data # A little

Full_Name: Mike Ulrich Version: 2.9 OS: Mac OSX Submission from: (NULL) (69.169.178.34) The help documentation for loadings() lists more then one parameter. The function call only expects one parameter. The digits, cutoff, and sort parameters are not used in the function. ## S3 method for class 'loadings': print(x, digits = 3, cutoff = 0.1, sort = FALSE, ...) ## S3 method for class

I am having difficulty obtaining the scores from my principal component analysis. I have used this method before and have had no problems. The data set that I am using this time is similar to what I have used in the past. What do I need to do to my dataset in order for me to obtain these scores? R screen says the following message Error in factanal(covmat = pasa.cov, factors = 4) :

On 15 Jun 2004 at 13:52, Vito Muggeo wrote: > Dear Petr, > Probably I don't understand exactly what you are looking for. > > However your "plot(x,c(y,z))" suggests a broken-line model for the > response "c(y,x)" versus the variables x. Therefore you could estimate > a segmented model to obtain (different) slope (and breakpoint) > estimates. See

Dear list members, Could any expert on factor analysis be so kind to explain how to calculate AIC on the output of factanal. Do I calculate AIC wrong or is factanal$criteria["objective"] not a negative log-likelihood? Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel The AIC calculated using summary.factanal below don't appear correct to me: n items factors total.df rest.df model.df

Dear list members, Could any expert on factor analysis be so kind to explain how to calculate AIC on the output of factanal. Do I calculate AIC wrong or is factanal$criteria["objective"] not a negative log-likelihood? Best regards Jens Oehlschl?gel The AIC calculated using summary.factanal below don't appear correct to me: n items factors total.df rest.df model.df

Hello! I have a data frame mysample (sorry for a long way of creating it below - but I need it in this form, and it works). I regress Y onto X1 through X11 - first without weights, then with weights: regtest1<-lm(Y~., data=mysample[-13])) regtest2<-lm(Y~., data=mysample[-13]),weights=mysample$weight) summary(regtest1) summary(regtest2) Then I calculate Durbin-Watson for both regressions

I'm running some GEE models but when I request the summary(pcb.gee) all I get are rows and rows of intercorelations and they fill up the screen buffer so I can not even scroll back to see what else might be in the summary. How do I get the summary function to NOT print the intercorrelations? Thanks, -- Dean Sonneborn Programmer Analyst Department of Public Health Sciences University of

Hi R users, I need some help in the followings: I'm doing factor analysis and I need to extract the loading values and the Proportion Var and Cumulative Var values one by one. Here is what I am doing: > fact <- factanal(na.omit(gnome_freq_r2),factors=5); > fact$loadings Loadings: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 Factor5 b1freqr2 0.246 0.486 0.145

hi, Does factanal() force the user to use the formula interface if they wish to specify an na.action? v1 <- c(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,NA,1,3,3,3,3,3,4,5,6) v2 <- c(1,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,2,1,3,NA,3,3,3,4,6,5) v3 <- c(3,3,3,3,3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,5,4,6) v4 <- c(3,3,4,NA,3,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,2,NA,1,5,6,4) v5 <- c(1,1,1,1,1,3,3,3,3,3,1,1,1,1,1,6,4,5) v6 <- c(1,1,1,2,1,3,3,3,4,3,1,1,1,2,1,6,5,4) m1

I'm trying to make correlograms using corrgram. See below for a simple example. #### library(corrgram) data(baseball) vars1 <- c("Assists","Atbat","Errors","Hits","Homer","logSal") vars2 <- c("Putouts","RBI","Runs","Walks","Years")

Hi, I have obtained some results with factanal that seem to support a hypothesis I already had, and I'd like to verify that I can indeed conclude this from this new analysis. We had subjects reproduce perceived trajectories with a device that allowed us to measure spatial position (the path) and the device's orientation at any of those positions. From this, we calculated the rotation of

Dear list members, I apologize for putting this (probably) very basic question on the mailing list. I have scanned through the R website (using search) but did not found an answer. (code included below) A factor matrix is simply extracted (which can then subsequently be exported using write.table) by FACT$loadings[1:6,]. I would also like to specifically extract and export

--=-hiYzUeWcRJ/+kx41aPIZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, on March 10 I filed a wishlist bug report asking for the inclusion of some changes to factanal() and the associated print method. The changes were originally proposed by John Fox in 2005; they make print.factanal() display factor correlations if factanal() is called with rotation =

Hi all, I would like to factorize the entries in a dataframe given some groupings. E.g: mydf = data.frame( a = rnorm(100,10), b = rnorm(100,10), c = rgamma(100, 1, scale=1)) group = hist(mydf$c, breaks="FD") group$breaks The idea is to create a factor "mydf$d" with levels corresponding to the ranges in group$breaks. There must be an easy way to do this that I

Hi, # For publications, I am not allowed to repeat the axes. I have tried to remove the axes using: # yaxt="n", but it did not work. I have not understood how to do this in ggplot2. Can you help me? # I also do not want loads of space between the graphs (see below script with Dummy Data). # If I could make it look like the examples on the (nice) examples page: #