similar to: [Rd] Citation for R

Dear Achim, Thanks for the comment. Here is the publisher's style guideline (AGU) "Because the Internet is dynamic environment and sites may change or move, treat World Wide Web, ftp files, and electronically archived data stored at data centers other than World or National Data Centers as unpublished, i.e., in text only." http://www.agu.org/pubs/AuthorRefSheet.pdf So by this

I've cited R in an article accepted by a journal using the following reference: >R Development Core Team (2004), R: A language and environment for >statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, >Austria. ISBN 3-900051-00-3, <http://www.Rproject.org>. I received the following query about my citation. > 7. For R Development Core Team [2004],

This is just a note that R would get a lot more citations if the recommended citation was an article in a recognised journal or from a recognised publisher. I use R in work leading to publications often, and I strongly want to give the R core team credit for their work. However I find that I can't persuade my biological collaborators to include the current R citation (below) in their

As a fourth option, I wonder if the first author could fork the package? Presumably, appropriately cited, a fork is permitted by the license under which it was released. Then the original package, by both authors, still exists (and a final version could point to the new one) and the new package, citing the previous version appropriately, is by a single author. The page of CRAN's policies

Dear Reasearchers, I am writing a report and i need (and wish) cite R. somebody know the citation of R for the 2012? or the more actual? thanks in advance Gianni [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R developers, This is a rather peculiar question, but nevertheless I would still need an answer for. It is about an R package which I created (namely QCA), and from versions 1.0-0 to 1.1-4 I had a co-author. The co-author recently withdrawn from the package development, but still requires to be left in the authors list and be cited for the package in the CITATION file. Obviously, one could

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro> wrote: > Dear Gabriel, > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > >> [...] >> >>> >>> I apologize for pushing this topic to the limit, but I haven't got an >>> answer to this question yet... >>> >>

Hello everyone, Very quick question: How should I cite the use of R in a publication ? Thanks in advance. Sebastien

Adrian, Responses inline On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > >> [...] >> >> At the very least, this is seems to be a flagrant violation of the >> *spirit* of the CRAN policy, which AFAIK is intended to

Hello! I would like to know how do I citate R? I have used it during my Master thesis but I don’t know how to citate during the text and on the references. I’ve looked for it on the web page but only found how to citate the FAQ. Thank you in advance. Tatiana Fernandes Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais - CBB Av. Alberto Lamego, 2.000 - Campos dos

Dear List, While trying to define a customised CITATION file for a package, following R-exts, I realised that if I use only one 'citEntry' I got both a text description and a BibTex entry for the package, as for the 'nlme' package: -------------------------- citation('nlme') To cite package 'nlme' in publications use: Jose Pinheiro, Douglas Bates, Saikat

On Oct 5, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote: > > > On 05.10.2015 23:47, Andrew Robinson wrote: >> As a fourth option, I wonder if the first author could fork the package? >> >> Presumably, appropriately cited, a fork is permitted by the license under >> which it was released. Then the original package, by both

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Adrian Du?a <dusa.adrian at unibuc.ro> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> > wrote: > >> [...] >> >> At the very least, this is seems to be a flagrant violation of the >> *spirit* of the CRAN policy, which AFAIK is intended to enforce >>

On 05.10.2015 23:47, Andrew Robinson wrote: > As a fourth option, I wonder if the first author could fork the package? > > Presumably, appropriately cited, a fork is permitted by the license under > which it was released. Then the original package, by both authors, still > exists (and a final version could point to the new one) and the new > package, citing the previous version

>> Buen día! >> Hemos enviado un trabajo a publicar y los evaluadores nos indican corregir la cita de R. Realmente no entiendo que quieren. Marcaron lo siguiente: >> >> R [A1] Development Core Team. 2009. R[A2] : A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.

Hi, I just need to know where the R was developed, for a journal article citation. Thanks Ronjon [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Lorena, Primero felicitaciones por terminar el trabajo para publicar. Respecto de tu pregunta, quizas mejor si le preguntas a quien te hizo la pregunta. En mi sesion de R el resultado es el siguiente > citation() To cite R in publications use: R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL

I'm about to present a report (for internal use of governmental agency). I used extensively R , contibuted packages, as well as communications on the R-list As well as citing R, I would like to know how to cite the contributed packages (it is not so easy, as some have been used exensively, other marginally, some are called from another package and some were not used as softwares but gave me

Simply advice: The former co-author contributed, so he is still author and probably copyright holder and has to be listed among the authors, otherwise it would be a CRAN policy violation since even if he does not develop further on, he developed parts of the so far existing package (if you talk about a CRAN package). I am not a lawyer, hence I cannot speak for copyright/license stuff in

The bibtex citations provided by citation() do not work all that well in cases where there is no printed document to reference: (1) A version field is needed, as the note field is required for other purposes, currently trying to sort out nuances that cannot be sorted out in the author list (author, compiler, implementor of R version, contributor, ...) and maybe giving a cross-reference to a book