similar to: reading in data with variable length

R 1.4.1, Linux and Windows for(i in 1:1000) { X <- rnorm(i) XX <- fft(fft(X), inverse=T)/i if(max(Mod(XX-X)) > 1e-10) print(i) } [1] 392 [1] 588 [1] 968 [1] 980 and I then get a segfault during gc(). The answers are way off, with imaginary parts 1e10 or more. These numbers are all multiples of 7^2 or 11^2. (Based on a report to R-help Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:37:34

I already have Wine working under Linux, primarily to run Quicken. I'm trying to run TaxAct 2000, without success. Starting TaxAct, I get the TaxAct splash screen followed by an error box stating "Unable to open 2000 Tax Return File.ta0". The filename contains whitespace as shown. The debug message log shows an attempt to open the file: Call kernel32.250:

Hi, I am new to R. and even though I've made my code to run and do what it needs to . It is taking forever and I can't use it like this. I was wondering if you could help me find ways to fix the code to run faster. Here are my codes.. the data set is a bunch of 0s and 1s in a data.frame. What I am doing is this. I pick a column and make up a new column Y with values associated with that

No i can start qemu but no network I have a bridge br0 with ta0 on it My start line qemu debian.5-0.x86.20100901.qcow --curses -net nic -net tap,ifname=tap0,script=no

This message is in MIME format --_=XFMail.1.3.p0.Linux:990422185944:4782=_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii R-0.64.0 on RedHat Linux 5.1 Some problems with multivariate fast fourier transform. I have attached the dump of a 30 x 3 matrix that seems to reliably reproduce these problems 1) mvfft doesn't like vectors. It complains about not having enough memory: R>

Commit-ID: 493f9a99220aed4eb7c6e3dd9018c037d45b13e2 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=493f9a99220aed4eb7c6e3dd9018c037d45b13e2 Author: Dejan Latinovic <Dejan.Latinovic at imgtec.com> AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:51:44 -0800 Committer: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at linux.intel.com> CommitDate: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:51:44 -0800 add-mips64-support-headers

This patch series adds support for preservation of the VM generation ID buffer address in xenstore across save/restore and migrate, and also code to increment the value in all cases except for migration. The first patch modifies creation of the hvmloader key in xenstore and adds creation of a new read/write hvmloader/generation-id-addr key. The second patch changes hvmloader to use the new key (as

This patch series adds support for preservation of the VM generation ID buffer address in xenstore across save/restore and migrate, and also code to increment the value in all cases except for migration. The vast majority of the code is in second patch. The first patch merely changes the xenstore key name used by hvmloader to store the buffer address.

Hi, I'm trying to create an abbreviated data file from a larger version. I can use the subset command to create a value for this data: dat <-subset(raw.data, select=c(SNP, Pvalue)) > head (dat) SNP Pvalue 1 rs11 0.6516 2 rs12 0.3311 3 rs13 0.5615 but when I try to write.table using: write.table (dat, file = "/path/to/my/data.txt", sep = " ",

Hi, I was wondering why the results from lm and dynlm are not the same for what I think is the same model. I have just modified example 4.2 from the Pfaff book, please see below for the code and results. Can anyone tell my what I am doing wrongly? Many thanks, Werner set.seed(123456) e1 <- rnorm(100) e2 <- rnorm(100) y1 <- ts(cumsum(e1)) y2 <- ts(0.6*y1 + e2) lr.reg <- lm(y2

Hello, A nice guy call Jun Shen was helping me out with this, but I require a bit more help. Below is my data set or list called 'test'. I'm trying to calculate the %RSD for each pair of index and keep it in cronological order if you can imagine a 3rd column with 'date' beside index. Result Index 1 0.2901 17 2 0.2928 17 3 0.2913 18 4 0.2893 18 5

I am trying to fit a generalised least squares model using gls in the nlme package. The model seems to fit very well when I plot the fitted values against the original values, and the model parameters have quite narrow confidence intervals (all are significant at p<5%). The problem is that the log likelihood is always given as -Inf. This doesn't seem to make sense because the model

Hi all: I have a question about multi-comparison. The data is in the attachment. My purpose: Compare the predicted means of the 3 methods(a,b,c) pairwisely. I have 3 ideas: #idea1 result_aov<-aov(y~ method + x1 + x2) TukeyHSD(result_aov) diff lwr upr p adj b-a 0.845 0.5861098 1.1038902 0.0000001 c-a 0.790 0.5311098 1.0488902 0.0000002 c-b -0.055 -0.3138902

Hi Ady, Your insightful post prompted me to to a little bit more digging as to how the Ridgecrop algorithm computed its FAT size, with the result of my investigations presented below. NB: For those who don't want to go through this whole part, there's a TL;DR near the end. For reference, the computation of the FAT size all done in the GetFATSizeSectors(), the code of which is at [1]

The following is a revised patch series to add support for a VM generation ID virtual device for HVM guests. The basic requirements of this device are as follows: - It must be exposed somewhere in ACPI namespace with a _CID of "VM_Gen_Counter". - It must also include a _DDN of "VM_Gen_Counter". - It must contain a _HID object but no particular value is required. - It must

> I make a study in health econometrics and have a categorical > dependent variable (take value 1-5). I would like to fit an ordered > probit or ordered logit but i didn't find a command or package who > make that. Does anyone know if it's exists ? R is very fancy. You won't get mundane things like ordered probit off the shelf. (I will be very happy if someone will show

--- Miroslav Lichvar <lichvarm@phoenix.inf.upol.cz> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:51:02AM -0500, Brady Patterson wrote: > > ... But it seems to me that you could make a decent guess > > about when something "new" happens based on the second derivative > of the signal > > (where the first derivative is the difference between a given > sample and the

Hi Ady, On 2016.02.25 02:08, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > There is an "extra" sector, in comparison to... what exactly? Sorry if I wasn't clear. I think I implied that the Large FAT32 fat size had an extra sector compared to minfatsize, when of course I meant the opposite (the Large FAT32 has one less sector than the minfatsize computed by the unpatched code, hence the check

Hi, i've been trying to apply the lme apprach to growth curves of children, but lme keeps running for ever and ever as soon as I use a reasonable basis. First Example: Data are 39 boys from the Berkeley growth study, each one measured 31 times at the ages of 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.00 13.50

Hello, I'm trying to create a for loop for a data set, I have a list of results in this data set and I want to take the 1st two add them together and divide by the mean of the 1st to, then do the same for the 3rd and 4th values in the list and so on and each time return a value for the calculation on each pair. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Al [[alternative HTML version