similar to: the output of coxph

Hi, Is it normal to get intercept in the list of covariates in the output of survreg function with standard error, z, p.value etc? Does it mean that intercept was fitted with the covariates? Does Value column represent coefficients or some thing else? Regards, ------------------------------------------------- tmp = survreg(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ ecog.ps + rx, ovarian,

It seems to me that R returns the unpenalized log-likelihood for the ratio likelihood test when ridge regression Cox proportional model is implemented. Is this as expected? In the example below, if I am not mistaken, fit$loglik[2] is unpenalized log-likelihood for the final estimates of coefficients. I would expect to get the penalized log-likelihood. I would like to check if this is as expected.

Hello, I have questions regarding penalized Cox regression using survival package (functions coxph() and ridge()). I am using R 2.8.0 on Ubuntu Linux and survival package version 2.35-4. Question 1. Consider the following example from help(ridge): > fit1 <- coxph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ rx + ridge(age, ecog.ps, theta=1), ovarian) As I understand, this builds a model in which `rx' is

Hi I am trying to understand how to get the validate() function in Design to work with the subset option. I tried this: ovarian.cph=cph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age+factor(ecog.ps)+strat(rx), time.inc=1000, x=T, y=T, data=ovarian) validate(ovarian.cph) #fine when no subset is used, but the following two don't work: > validate(ovarian.cph, subset=ovarian$ecog.ps==2) Error in

It seems to me that summary for ridge coxph() prints summary but returns NULL. It is not a big issue because one can calculate statistics directly from a coxph.object. However, for some reason the score test is not calculated for ridge coxph(), i.e score nor rscore components are not included in the coxph object when ridge is specified. Please find the code below. I use 2.9.2 R with 2.35-4 version

I am confused when trying the function survfit. my question is: what does the survival curve given by plot.survfit mean? is it the survival curve with different covariates at different points? or just the baseline survival curve? for example, I run the following code and get the survival curve #### library(survival) fit<-coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~resid.ds+rx+ecog.ps,data=ovarian)

Hello everyone, I tried to use coxph.detail() to get the hazard function. But a warning messge always returns to me, even in the example provided by its help document: > ?coxph.detail > fit <- coxph(Surv(futime,fustat) ~ age + rx + ecog.ps, ovarian, x=TRUE) > fitd <- coxph.detail(fit) Warning message: data length [37] is not a sub-multiple or multiple of the number of rows

I am wondering how to estimate the survival curve for a particular case(s) given a coxph model using this example code: #fit a cox proportional hazards model and plot the #predicted survival curve fit <- coxph( Surv(futime,fustat)~resid.ds+strata(rx)+ecog.ps+age,data=ovarian[1:23,]) z <- survfit(fit,newdata=ovarian[24:26,],individual=F) zs <- z$surv zt <-

I am trying to fit a lognormal distribution on interval-censored data. Some of my intervals have a lower bound of zero. Unfortunately, it seems like survreg() cannot deal with lower bounds of zero, despite the fact that plnorm(0)==0 and pnorm(-Inf)==0 are well defined. Below is a short example to reproduce the problem. Does anyone know why survreg() must behave that way? Is there an alternate

hi sorry if this has been discussed before, but I'm wondering why the scaled Schoenfeld residuals do not follow the defining formula for obtaining them from the ordinary Schoenfeld residuals, but are instead offset by the estimated parameter values. e.g. library(survival) attach(ovarian) sv<-Surv(futime,fustat) f1<-coxph(sv~age+ecog.ps) f1

Hello, i have this dataset http://www.umass.edu/statdata/statdata/data/pharynx.txt. the variables GRADE, T_STAGE anda N_STAGE are qualitative or quantitative variables??? i only have this simple doubt...! another example: why in the dataset ovarian (library survival) the variable ecog.ps: ECOG performance status (1 is better, see reference) it is consider quantitative? Thank's for

Hi,Just a quick one, does anyone know the command for accessing the standard errors from a survreg object? I can access the coefficients by model$coefficients, but I cant seem to find a command to access the errors. Any help would be greatly appreciated.Regards,Andre [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear R I am trying to understand and use the flexible parametric survival model suggested by Royston and Parmar. However I am stuck trying to plot the adjusted survival curves for different covariates in the following code: library(flexsurv) library(graphics) spl <- flexsurvspline(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ rx+ecog.ps+resid.ds+age, data = ovarian, k=2, scale="odds") spl the code

For a fitted Cox model, one can either produce the predicted survival curve for a particular "hypothetical" subject (survfit), or the predicted curve for a particular cohort of subjects (survexp). See chapter 10 of Therneau and Grambsch for a long discussion of the differences between these, and the various pitfalls. By default, survfit produces the curve for a hypothetical

Hello, I've had no luck finding an R package that has the ability to estimate a Tobit model allowing for heteroskedasticity (multiplicative, for example). Am I missing something in survReg? Is there another package that I'm unaware of? Is there an add-on package that will test for heteroskedasticity? Thanks for your help. Cheers, Alan Spearot -- Alan Spearot Department of Economics

Hi, I'm sure this should be simple but I can't figure it out! I want to get the median survival calculated by the survfit function and use the value rather than just be able to print it. Something like this: library(survival) data(lung) lung.byPS = survfit(Surv (time, status) ~ ph.ecog, data=lung) # lung.byPS Call: survfit(formula = Surv(time, status) ~ ph.ecog, data = lung) 1

Dear all, I need to calculate likelihood ratio test for ridge regression. In February I have reported a bug where coxph returns unpenalized log-likelihood for final beta estimates for ridge coxph regression. In high-dimensional settings ridge regression models usually fail for lower values of lambda. As the result of it, in such settings the ridge regressions have higher values of lambda (e.g.

[code]>require("survival") > coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~age + strata(rx),ovarian) Call: coxph(formula = Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age + strata(rx), data = ovarian) coef exp(coef) se(coef) z p age 0.137 1.15 0.0474 2.9 0.0038 Likelihood ratio test=12.7 on 1 df, p=0.000368 n= 26, number of events= 12 > coxph(Surv(futime,fustat)~age, ovarian, subset=rx==1)

Dear all: Could anyone please provide some R codes to plot the below survival data to compare two groups (0 vs 1) after 2 simulations (TRL)? need 95% prediction interval on the plot from these 2 trials. I would like to simulate 1000 trials later. Thanks a lot for your great help and consideration! yan TRL ID ECOG BASE PTR8 GROUP POP ST ind 1 1 1 1 2.2636717 0.255634126 1 1 99.4 F 3 1 2 1

I was looking at how the model.frame method for lm works and comparing it to my own for coxph. The big difference is that I try to retain xlevels and predvars information for a new model frame, and lm does not. I use a call to model.frame in predict.coxph, which is why I went that route, but never noted the difference till now (preparing for my course in Nashville). Could someone shed light