similar to: contrast {Design} question

Hi r-users, I have a matrix B and a list of 3x3 matrices (mylist). I want to calculate the quantiles in the list using each of the value of B as probabilities. The codes I wrote are: B <- matrix (runif(12, 0, 1), 3, 4) mylist <- lapply(mylist, function(x) {matrix (rnorm(9), 3, 3)}) for (i in 1:length(B)) { quant <- lapply (mylist, quantile, probs=B[i]) } But quant

Dear, I want to make an application to calculate quantile within a For() I tried the following without success: ej. date p_val <- matrix(sample(10, 1000, replace=TRUE), 200,5) test 1 rr <- paste("p_val$",names(p_val[1]), sep="") quant <- quantile(rr, probs = c(0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100)/100, na.rm=FALSE, type=1) test 2 rr <-

Dear Help List, Thanks in advance for reading...I hope my questions are not too ignorant. I have an experiment looking at evolution of wing size [centroid] in fruitflies and the effect of 6 different experimental treatments [treatment]. I have five replicate populations [replic] in each treatment and have reared the flies in two different temperatures [cond] to assay the wing size, making

Hello, I've got what I'd expect to be a pretty simple issue: I fit an aov object using multiple error strata, and would like some significance tests for the contrasts I specified. In this contrived example, I model some test score as the interaction of a subject's gender and two emotion variables (angry, happy, neutral), measured at entry to the experiment (entry) and later

Hello, I am using Dr. Harrell's design package to make a nomogram. I was able to make a beautiful one without stratifying, however, I will need to stratify to meet PH assumptions. This is where I go wrong, but I'm not sure where. Non-Stratified Nomogram:

Can anyone please tell me if there is a function to calculate confidence intervals for the results of the quantile function. Some of my data is normally distributed but some is also a squewed distribution or a capped normal distribution. Some of the data sets contain about 700 values whereas others are smaller with about 100-150 values, so I would like to see how the confidence intervals change

I'm wondering if anyone would be able to help me out. I'm trying to use a type II ANOVA for a model with user-specified contrasts and covariates. I have two treatment groups and a control group. I'm comparing average treatment to controls and also between the two treatment groups, but I'm also looking to adjust for age and gender as covariates:

Hi. I was wondering if anyone might have some suggestions about how I can overcome a problem of "iteration limit reached without convergence" when fitting a mixed effects model. In this study: Outcome is a measure of heart action Age is continuous (in weeks) Gender is Male or Female (0 or 1) Genotype is Wild type or knockout (0 or 1) Animal is the Animal ID as a factor

Dear R-user, I have a data like this below, age <- c("young","mid","old") married <- c("no","yes") income <- c("low","high","medium") gender <- c("female","male") I want to make some of combination data like these, age.income.dat <- expand.grid(age,

dear all, I'm building new dataframes from bigger one's using e.g. columns F76, F83, F90: JJ<-data.frame( c( as.character(rep( gender,3))) , c( F76,6- F83, F90) ) Looking into JJ one has: c.as.character.rep.gender..8... c.6...F73..F78..F79..F82..6...F84..F94..F106..F109 1 w 2 2 w

Dear R people, I am having a problem with modeling the following SAS code in R: Class ID Gr Hemi Region Gender Model Y = Gr Region Hemi Gender Gr*Hemi Gr*Region Hemi*Region Gender*Region Gender*Hemi Gr*Hemi*Region Gender*Hemi*Region Gr*Gender*Hemi*Region Random Intercept Region Hemi /Subject = ID (Gr Gender) I.e., ID is a random effect nested in Gr and Gender, leading to ID-specific

Hi everyone, I'm having some difficulty getting "simple effects" for the ols() function in the rms package. The example below illustrates my difficulty -- I'll be grateful for any help. #make up some data exD <- structure(list(Gender = structure(c(1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 1L, 2L), .Label = c("F", "M"), class = "factor"),

Hi there, > Value=c(709,679,699,657,594,677,592,538,476,508,505,539) > Lard=rep(c("Fresh","Rancid"),each=6) > Gender=rep(c("Male","Male","Male","Female","Female","Female"),2) > Food=data.frame(Value,Lard,Gender) > Food Value Lard Gender 1 709 Fresh Male 2 679 Fresh Male 3 699 Fresh

"&&" seems to behave strangely and gives different results from "&" e.g. in a data frame selection (regardless whether terms are bracketed)? ===========Script======================= test=data.frame(gender=c("F","M","M","F","F"),side=c("R","L","R","L","R")) test

Dear R-Community! For example I have a study with 4 treatment groups (10 subjects per group) and 4 visits. Additionally, the gender is taken into account. I think - and hope this is a goog idea (!) - this data can be analysed using lme as below. In a balanced design everything is fine, but in an unbalanced design there are differences depending on fitting y~visit*treat*gender or

I am trying to plot an interaction in a multilevel model. Here is some sample data. In the following example, it is longitudinal (i.e., repeated measures), so the outcome, score (at each of the three time points), is nested within the individual. I am interested in the interaction between gender and happiness predicting score. id <- c(1,1,1,2,2,2,3,3,3) age <-

Hello ALL! I have a problem to plot factor (lets say gender) as a line, or at least both line and point, from ols model: ols1 <- ols(Y ~ gender, data=dat, x=T, y=T) plot(ols1, gender=NA, xlab="gender", ylab="Y", ylim=c(5,30), conf.int=FALSE) If I convert gender into discrete numeric predictor, and use forceLines=TRUE, plot is not nice and true, since it shows values

Hello, I have a problem with selecting the right type of sums of squares for an ANCOVA for my specific experimental data and hypotheses. I do have a basic understanding of the differences between Type-I, II, and III SSs, have read about the principle of marginality, and read Venable's "Exegeses on Linear Models" (http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS3/Exegeses.pdf). I am pretty new to

Hello: I need to create a six barplots from data that looks pretty close to what appears below. There are two grouping variables (age and gender) and three dependent variables for each grouping variables. I'm not really familiar with trellis graphics, perhaps there is something that can do what I need there, i don't know. The thing is: I *need* these to appear on one row, with some way

Hello there, when using the function numSummary in Rcmdr and selecting more than one variable (without grouping), the grand mean across all variables is returned for each variable instead of the mean of each single variable. However, this happens only for the mean, and not for sd, quantiles and na. This is the output: > numSummary(dataset1 [,c("var1", "var2")],