similar to: Top N correlations from 'cor' for very large datasets being run many times

Hi, I have a list p with different size dataframes and length of over 8000. I'm trying to calculate correlations between the rows of dataframes of this list and columns of another dataset (type data.frame also) so that first column is correlated with all the rows in the list dataframe. Some information from another dataset is also included to the final output (all.corrs). This worked a

Hello to all of you, R-expeRts! I am trying to compute the cor.test for a matrix that i labelled mydata according to mydata=read.csv... then I converted my csv file into a matrix with the mydata=as.matrix(mydata) NOW, I need to get the p-values from the correlations... I can successfully get the spearman's correlation matrix with: cor(mydata, method="s",

I've a vector of pairwise correlations in the order low-index element precedes the high-index element, say: corr(1,2)=0.1, corr(1,3)=0.2, corr(2,3)=0.3, corr(3,4)=0.4 How can I construct the corresponding correlation matrix? I tried using the "combn"-function in "combinat" package: library(combinat) combn(c(0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4),2) , but to no avail... Thank you for your

Can someone help me calculate correlations for grouped values? Heres what my first few line of data look like: > head(cmexpr) LLID GMID CEXPR MEXPR 1 1005 10831 2.057462 -0.08486 2 1005 10831 2.057515 -0.08486 3 1005 10831 2.057462 0.01209 4 1005 10831 2.057515 0.01209 5 1005 10836 2.050980 0.17237 6 1005 10836 2.018576 0.17237 LLID is gene id, GMID is cell line id, the EXPR

Hi all, I was experiencing a similar problem with some code which uses the package maCorrPlot (BioConductor) http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.6/bioc/html/maCorrPlot.html to compute the correlation between different variables. This code was working apparently fine under R 2.9 (but it was raising warning messages!) and the same was not working under R 2.11. A simple example was: 1.>

Hi Group, Consider a data frame like this: mylabel1 <- rep(c("A","B","C"),each=3) mylabel2 <- rep(c("A","B","C"),3) corrs <- c(1,.8,.7,.8,1,.7,.7,.7,1) myData <- data.frame(mylabel1,mylabel2,corrs) myData mylabel1 mylabel2 corrs 1 A A 1.0 2 A B 0.8 3 A C 0.7 4 B

I will be out of the office starting 24/12/2002 and will not return until 06/01/2003. You can contact me on 0407 756 568. <p><p><p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential. You must not disclose or use the information contained in this e-mail

Dear R-listers, I am fitting bivariate mixed models for cost-effectiveness data of cluster randomized trials using lme in R. So I have individuals nested within clusters. My response variable is a vector with bivariate response (individual level costs and effects) stacked into a single column. The covariates in my models are a constant and a treatment term. They are response-specific, e.g. a

There seems to be an issue in computing rank correlations with missing values present. I think this comes from the way rank() function works but I am not sure how to go about this. Rank function places missing values at the end by default thus skewing the rank relationship between two vectors: Example: R : Copyright 2003, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Version 1.8.1 (2003-11-21),

I am trying to run the following function (a hierarchical bayes linear model) and receive the error in solve.default. The function was originally written for an older version of SPlus. Can anyone give me some insights into where the problem is? Thanks R 2.4.1 on MAC OSX 2mb ram Mark Grant markg at uic.edu > attach(Aspirin.frame) > hblm(Diff ~ 1, s = SE) Error in solve.default(R, rinv)

Dear R maintainers, R is great. Now that I have that out of the way, I believe I have encountered a bug, or at least an inconsistency, in how Spearman and Kendall rank correlations are handled. Specifically, cor() and cor.test() do not produce the same answer when the data contain NAs. cor() treats the NAs as data, while cor.test() eliminates them. The option use="complete.obs" has

I postulate the following model AC <- glmer(Accuracy ~ RT*Group + (1+RT|Group:subject) + (1+RT|Group:Trial), data = da, family = binomial, verbose = T) Here I predict Accuracy from RT, Group (which has values 0 or 1) and the interaction of Group and RT (those are the fixed effects). I also estimate the random effects for both intercepts and slopes for subjects and different trials.

Hi UseRs, I don't want to die beeing idiot... I dont understand the different results between: cor() and cov2cov(cov()). See this little example: > x=matrix(c(0.5,0.2,0.3,0.1,0.4,NA,0.7,0.2,0.6,0.1,0.4,0.9),ncol=3) > cov2cor(cov(x,use="pairwise.complete.obs")) [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 1.0000000 0.4653400 -0.1159542 [2,] 0.4653400 1.0000000

Hallo! Is there an error in cor to calculate Spearman correlation with cor if there are NA's? cor.test gives the correct result. At least there is a difference. Or am I doing something wrong??? Does anybody know something about this? a<-c(2,4,3,NA) b<-c(4,1,2,3) cor(a, b, method="spearman", use="complete.obs") # -0.9819805 cor.test(a, b,

R: I got a warning message when running the cor.test function using both Spearman and Kendall rank correlations saying that the p-value may be incorrect due to ties in the data. My data has 35 obs and one series has 6 pairs of ties. Does anyone know if this would likely have a great effect on the p-values calculated.. The values look good; tau = -0.68 with p-value = 8e-9 and rho = =0.84

Dear all, when trying to replicate John M. Quick's example for correlations between multiple variables posted on: http://rtutorialseries.blogspot.com/2009/11/r-tutorial-series-zero-order.html with R 2.11.0 (GUI 1.33) using my MacBook Pro with OX X 10.5.8 I got the following error message > datavar<-read.csv("dataset_readingTests.csv") > cor(datavar) Error in cor(datavar)

Hi, I am trying to use R for some survey analysis, and need to compute the significance of some correlations. I read the man pages for cor and cor.test, but I am confused about - whether these functions are intended to work the same way - about how these functions handle NA values - whether cor.test supports 'use = complete.obs'. Some example output may explain why I am confused:

With a data frame containing some X & Y variables I can get the between set correlations with cor(X,Y): > cor(NLSY[,1:2], NLSY[3:6]) antisoc hyperact income educ math 0.043381307 -0.07581733 0.25487753 0.2876875 read -0.003735785 -0.07555683 0.09114299 0.1884101 Is there somewhere an analog of pairs(X,Y) that will produce the pairwise plots of each X against each

Is there a simple way to run cor.test on for a matrix of correlations? Of course, cor on a data frame produces a correlation matrix, but cor.test will only take two variables at a time. Is there a way to get behavior similar to that of cor with cor.test? I suppose the programming alternative would be to run two for loops with the number of items and cor test embedded accessing the columns of

Hello everyone, I'm a new R user switching from SAS and JMP. In the first few days, I have been trying to do a fairly simple task but yet found no success. I've checked the help archive as well as few R textbooks but didn't seem to find the answer. So, please help me if you can. Basically, I want to calculate the correlation between variable A and B for every subject in my