similar to: Shared Frailty in survival package (left truncation, time-dep. covariates)

Hi! I want to estimate a shared gamma frailty model with left truncated data. I use a parametric baseline hazard so that I can use simple ML estimation. As I have a big data set it is ok to assume piecewise constant baseline hazards. As my data are left truncated I have modified the definition of the risk set. Do I also have to modifiy the frailty distribution if I have left truncated data?

Hi, I would like to fit parametric survival models to time-to-event data that are left truncated. I have checked the help page for survreg and looked in the R-help archive, and it appears that the R function survreg from the survival library (version 2.16) should allow me to take account of left truncation. However, when I try the command

Hi: I have a few clarification questions about the elements returned by the coxph function used in conjuction with a frailty term. I create the following group variable: group <- NULL group[id<50] <- 1 group[id>=50 & id<100] <- 2 group[id>=100 & id<150] <- 3 group[id>=150 & id<200] <- 4 group[id>=200 & id<250] <- 5 group[id>=250

Hello, We are using frailty models to estimate risk of one year death. Is there a way to generate survival curves adjusted for covariates and also include frailty term? Any help will be much appreciated! Thanks! LV [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I'm trying to estimate a cox model with a frailty variable and time-dependent covariate (below there is the statement I use and the error message). It's seems to be impossible, because every time I add the time-dependent covariate the model doesn't converge. Instead, if I estimate the same model without the time-dependent covariate it's converge. I'd like knowing if

Dear R users: I'm generating the following survival data: set.seed(123) n=200 #sample size x=rbinom(n,size=1,prob=.5) #binomial treatment v=rgamma(n,shape=1,scale=1) #gamma frailty w=rweibull(n,shape=1,scale=1) #Weibull deviates b=-log(2) #treatment's slope t=exp( -x*b -log(v) + log(w) ) #failure times c=rep(1,n) #uncensored indicator id=seq(1:n) #individual frailty indicator

Dear List, In documents (Therneau, 2003 : On mixed-effect cox models, ...), as far as I came to know, coxme penalize the partial likelihood (Ripatti, Palmgren, 2000) where as frailtyPenal (in frailtypack package) uses the penalized the full likelihood approach (Rondeau et al, 2003). How, then, coxme and coxph(...frailty(id, dist='gauss')) differs? Just the coding algorithm, or in

Dear All, The "coxph" function in the "survival" package allows multiple frailty terms. In all the examples I saw, however, the frailty terms are nested. What will happen if I have non-nested (that is, cross-classified) frailties in the model? Will the model still work? Do I need to take special cares when specifying these models? Thanks! Shige [[alternative HTML

Does someone know the rules by which 'coxph' returns 'frail', the predicted frailty terms? In my test function: ----------------------------------------------- fr <- function(){ #testing(frailty terms in 'survival' require(survival) dat <- data.frame(exit = 1:6, event = rep(1, 6), x = rep(c(0, 1), 3),

Dear List, Can anyone please explain the difference between cluster() and frailty() in a coxph? I am a bit puzzled about it. Would appreciate any useful reference or direction. cheers, Ehsan > marginal.model <- coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ rx + cluster(litter), rats) > frailty.model <- coxph(Surv(time, status) ~ rx + frailty(litter), rats) > marginal.model Call: coxph(formula =

Hola! I started to search for information about multilevel survival models, and found frailty in R. This seems to be something of the same, is it the same? Then: why the name frailty (weekness?) -- Kjetil Halvorsen. Peace is the most effective weapon of mass construction. -- Mahdi Elmandjra

Hi: I have a question about the use of the survfit function after the estimation of a cox proportional hazard model with a frailty term. My goal is to estimate expected survival probabilities while controlling for the group-specific frailty term. First, I estimate a model of the following form: model1 <- coxph(Surv(t0, t, d) ~ x1 + x2 + frailty(id), na.action=na.exclude,

Dear R-users, I have noticed small discrepencies in the reported estimate of the variance of the frailty by the print method for survreg() and the 'theta' component included in the object fit: # Examples in R-2.6.2 for Windows library(survival) # version 2.34-1 (2008-03-31) # discrepancy fit1 <- survreg(Surv(time, status) ~ rx + frailty(litter), rats) fit1 fit1$history[[1]]$theta

Dear R-help, I am trying to estimate a Cox model with nested effects, or better h(t,v,w)=v*w*h0(t)*exp(B'x) where h(t,v,w) is the individual hazard function w and v are both frailty terms (gamma or normal distributed) I have 12 clusters and for each one of them I would like to associate a realization of v, while w is a random effect for the whole population. At the population level

I am confused on how the log-likelihood is calculated in a parametric survival problem with frailty. I see a contradiction in the frailty() help file vs. the source code of frailty.gamma(), frailty.gaussian() and frailty.t(). The function frailty.gaussian() appears to calculate the penalty as the negative log-density of independent Gaussian variables, as one would expect: >

Dear all, I would have some questions on the coxph function for survival analysis, which I use with frailty terms. My model is: mdcox<-coxph(Surv(time,censor)~ gender + age + frailty(area, dist='gauss'), data) I have a very large proportion of censored observations. - If I understand correctly, the function mdcox$frail will return the random effect estimated for each group on the

Hello, I am working on the frailty model using coxph functions. I am running some simulations and want to store the variance of frailty (theta) values from each simulation result. Can anyone help me how to extract the theta values from the results. I appreciate any help. Thanks Shankar Viswanathan

On Tue, 6 May 2003, Jerome Asselin wrote: > > I am confused on how the log-likelihood is calculated in a parametric > survival problem with frailty. I see a contradiction in the frailty() help > file vs. the source code of frailty.gamma(), frailty.gaussian() and > frailty.t(). > > The function frailty.gaussian() appears to calculate the penalty as the > negative

Hi, I have a question about the output for variance of random effect from a gamma frailty model using coxph in R. Is it the vairance of frailties themselves or variance of log frailties? Thanks. Guanghui

Dear List, How do I extract the approximate Wald test for the frailty (in the following example 17.89 value)? What about the P-values, other Chisq, DF, se(coef) and se2? How can they be extracted? ######################################################> kfitm1 Call: coxph(formula = Surv(time, status) ~ age + sex + disease + frailty(id, dist = "gauss"), data = kidney)