similar to: How to intepret a factor response model?

I'm wondering about the behavior of the merge function when using factors as by variables. I know that when you combine two factors using c() the results can be odd, as in: c(factor(1:5),factor(6:10)) which prints: [1] 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 I presume this is because factors are actually stored as integers, with 6,7,8,9,10 stored internally as 1,2,3,4,5. This concerns me somewhat, as I often

Hi everyone, I have encountered this problem while using 'segmented' plugin for R i386 2.15.0 (for Windows 32bit OS) and I just cannot find neither explanation nor solution for it. I am trying to run this data gpp temp 1.661 5 5.028 10 9.772 15 8.692 20 5.693 25 6.293 30 7.757 5 4.604 10 8.763 15 8.134 20 4.616 25 8.417 30 3.483 5 5.046 10 8.306 15 9.142 20 4.686 25 7.301 30 and with

--- linux power <linuxpower2002@yahoo.no> skrev: > Dato: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 21:40:07 +0200 (CEST) > Fra: linux power <linuxpower2002@yahoo.no> > Tema: Fwd: SOLVED SOLVED:Connecting problem:Need > Help > Til: samba@lista.samba > > Yes it was the iptables firewall that was the > problem. > The port 137-139 were not opened as I thought they > were. I should

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:36:16AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 10 October 2017 at 09:55, KM <info4km at yahoo.com> wrote: > > First off - let me say I am not an administrator. I need to know if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition. When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size. it's too small and I

On 10 October 2017 at 09:55, KM <info4km at yahoo.com> wrote: > First off - let me say I am not an administrator. I need to know if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition. When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size. it's too small and I can't do yum updates. > if it's not easy to actually increase it, is it

Hi all ! Following my recent issued with my encoder, I've narrowed the issue to the fact that, when encoding, for some returned pages, the granulepos returned by the libogg is -1. Is that normal ? How should I intepret it if I want to order the pages ? Romain

Thanks for all of the input, not really sure what if anything I will do.? i was hoping it would be easy and i could just create a /boot in root, and copy the actual boot contents to it and use it.?? wishful thinking i guess.? just to give a complete picture here is the current partitioning on the server....in case anyone wants to say anymore.? Thanks in advance. Filesystem??????????? Size? Used

I have problem connecting a win 98 client to a samba 2.2.5 server on a linux box running redhat 7.2 I can see the server on the client but when I click the server icon I get \\lindoze is no accessible. At that moment I have scanned the lan card an I have this screen dump. 04:15:55.053492 kjersti.hauge.netbios-ns > 192.168.0.255.netbios-ns: >>> NBT UDP PACKET(137): QUERY; REQUEST;

Hello R community, I am computing weighted average statistic by using ddply function: My data set is: N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY-4 ROE11 EPS11 MKT11 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY-3 ROE12 EPS12 MKT12 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY-2 ROE13 EPS13 MKT13 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY-1 ROE14 EPS14 MKT14 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY0 ROE15 EPS15 MKT15 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY1 ROE16 EPS16 MKT16 N1 T1 S1 I1 C1 FY2 ROE17

First off - let me say I am not an administrator.?? I need to know?if there is an easy way to increase my /boot partition.? When I installed CentOS 6 after running 5, it was my oversight not to increase the /boot size.? it's too small and I can't do yum updates. if it's not easy to actually increase it, is it safe to take a chunk in my root filesystem (like /new.boot or something) and

Dear all, I've got a problem in fitting multilevel model in lme. I don't know to much about that but suspect that something is wrong with my model. I'm trying to fit: m1<-lme(X~Y,~1|group,data=data,na.action=na.exclude,method="ML") m2<-lme(X~Y+Z,~1|group,data=data,na.action=na.exclude,method="ML") where: X - dependent var. measured on a scale ranging from

hi all, I want to move some routing tasks out of the router and into the controller. The goal is to make Merb feel less like mod_rewrite and give the user more control at the controller. The new Router is simple: it takes the path_info (not the whole request) then outputs a controller class and some parameters from the path matching. The rest of the routing would be done at the controller level.

Dear List, I have acquired a new desktop and wanted to put a free OS on it. I am trying Fedora Core 1, but not sure what the best Linux OS is for using R 2.0.1? Thank you in advance for your input, Tom Volscho ************************************ Thomas W. Volscho Graduate Student Dept. of Sociology U-2068 University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269 Phone: (860) 486-3882

Hi, I am fairly new to GAM and started using package mgcv. I like the fact that optimal smoothing is automatically used (i.e. df are not determined a priori but calculated by the gam procedure). But the mgcv manual warns that p-level for the smooth can be underestimated when df are estimated by the model. Most of the time my p-levels are so small that even doubling them would not result

I would really like the bug fixed. At least this one, because I know people in my institute using this function. I understand your arguments about open source, but I also saw in this mail list a proposal for a fix for this bug for which there were no answer from the people who are able to include it in the distribution. It looks like if there were interesting bugs and the other ones. I don't

Hi, Sean: I'm sorry I lie. I didn't mean to lie. I did try to avoid making a *BIG* change to the IPO pass-ordering for now. However, when I make a minor change to populateLTOPassManager() by separating module-pass and non-module-passes, I saw quite a few performance difference, most of them are degradations. Attacking these degradations one by one in a piecemeal manner is wasting

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

On Solaris 10 If I install using ZFS root on only one drive is there a way to add another drive as a mirror later? Sorry if this was discussed already. I searched the archives and couldn''t find the answer. Thank you.