similar to: anomalous result for wilcox.exact in exactRankTests

Dear R friends, here I write again about the wilcox.exact() problem. I want to compare two sets of categorical data, and in one case it says "negative length vectors not allowed", and in the other one I get the error "cannot allocate vector of length ...". On http://rapidshare.com/files/298621893/wilcox.exact_trouble.Rdata.html you can download the data that cause the

When an RGB photo is displayed using R's image() function with the help of the pixmap (or rimage) package it is common to see an anomalous white line running across the picture (either horizontally or vertically). The line can be removed by simply stretching the image frame a little in the direction perpendicular to the anomalous line, or by maximizing the image frame (tested under Fedora 10;

Dear R friends, I want to compare two datasets and I get the message Error in .Call("cpermdist2", ma = as.integer(m), mb = as.integer(col), : negative length vectors are not allowed after specifying the exact test. I'm using the exactRankTests package. Do you suggest me using the coin library, or is there anything "wrong" with my data? Kind regards, David --

Full_Name: Patrick Hodgson Version: 2.0 OS: solaris 2.9 Submission from: (NULL) (65.94.128.161) The value reported for the parameter W in the function wilcox.exact appears to be incorrect. I have checked the reference in the help file for this function (Myles & Hollander 1973, as well as 2nd ed. 1999 by same authors) and it is clear that W is the sum of the ranks of the data set with the

Full_Name: Michael W. Grant Version: 1.7.1(2003-06-16) OS: Windows 98 Second Edition 4.10.2222 A Submission from: (NULL) (24.55.165.101) I just installed version 1.7.1 tonight. In the process I installed via CRAN from the menu several packages. One installation, exactRankTests, had a distinct anomaly. A DLL attempt to change FPU control word as seem in the last line of the following listing:

Hi, I am running the following example which can be found on page 12 of the pdf file of COIN package wt<-wilcox_test(pd~age,data=water_transfer,distribution="exact", conf.int=TRUE) "wt" actually contains the estimate of difference in location and the confidence interval of it. I am just wondering how can I extract these values? From the examples, I understand that the

Hello, (Apologies for length, wanted to get all the relevant detail in that I know of). I've been having a lot of trouble with some code for an inventory analysis problem I was doing, and finally came to the conclusion that it appears that choose() is returning incorrect values. Specifically: ------------- Browse[1]> nn [1] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

Does anyone know why wilcox.exact gives W-statistic 6 instead of 12 as indicated below. 12 is the rank sum of group 0 of x, which is the linear statistic computed by wilcox_test. y<-c(1,2,3,4,5) x<-c(1,1,0,0,0) (a) wilcox.exact wilcox.exact(y~x) Exact Wilcoxon rank sum test data: y by x W = 6, p-value = 0.2 alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0 (b) wilcox_test

I'm having trouble with the wilcox.test command in R. To demonstrate the anomalous behavior of wilcox.test, consider > wilcox.test(c(1.5,5.5), c(1:10000), exact = F)$p.value [1] 0.01438390 > wilcox.test(c(1.5,5.5), c(1:10000), exact = T)$p.value [1] 6.39808e-07 (this calculation takes noticeably longer). > wilcox.test(c(1.5,5.5), c(1:20000), exact = T)$p.value (R closes/crashes)

Dear List, after updating the exactRanksumTests package I receive a warning that the package is not developed any further and that one should consider the coin package. I don't find the signed rank test in the coin package, only the Wilcoxon Mann Whitney U-Test. I only found a signed rank test in the stats package (wilcox.test) which is able to calculate the exact pvalues but unfortunately

Dear r-helpers, I have a small dataset (n<50), and I want to compute the Hodges Lehmann exact confidence interval. So far, I know that "pairwiseCI" has the function "HL.diff". The description is as follows : HL.diff calculates the Hodges-Lehmann confidence interval for the difference of locations by calling wilcox.exact in package exactRankTests ; But when I check

I took some time and liberty and tried to improve existing implementation of SignRank functions in R. (dsignrank, ...) As I have seen they've been based on csignrank. So I modified csignrank and, I believe, improved calculation time and memory efficiency. The idea is basically the same. I use the same recursion as original author used with one slight modification. I am generating Wilcoxon

I've noticed rather strange wtmp logging behavior in sshd. Can anyone confirm or solve the following: Once a user authenticates themself to sshd, sshd among other things records the login in the wtmp, which `last` reads. However, sshd logs hostnames which are longer than 16 characters instead of IPs like normal programs would. As a result, I have useless entries such as: tempest

Hi, in the code below, I am drawing 1000 samples from two beta distributions, each time using the same random number seed. Using set.seed(80) produces results I expect, in that the differences between the distributions are very small. Using set.seed(20) produces results I can't make sense of. Around half of the time, it behaves as with set.seed(80), but around half of the time, it behaves

I have a file: x y z 0.025 0.025 1.65775 0.025 0.050 1.62602 0.025 0.075 1.63683 0.025 0.100 1.91847 0.025 0.125 2.00913 0.025 0.150 1.82222 0.025 0.175 1.70901 0.025 0.200 1.39759 0.025 0.225 1.39089 0.025 0.250 1.04762 If I read the file like this: data<-read.table("file.dat") How do I access the vectors x,y,z that are inside the dataframe data? I studied Venables and

Depending on the setting of par()$usr, the 'at' setting in mtext(.., adj=0, outer=T) may cause the text to appear in an anomalous position (e. g. in the first instance below, at the left of the plot region rather than at 'at=0' in the figure region), or the text may not appear at all. If one does not set the 'at' parameter the text appears (with 'adj=0') on the

There is a fairly new bug in wilcox.test in R-2.2.1 (stable). It wasn't there when I last taught nonparametrics in fall 2003. Line 86 of wilcox.test.R achieved.alpha<-2*psignrank(trunc(qu),n) It should be achieved.alpha<-2*psignrank(trunc(qu)-1,n) If you don't see why, decode the cookbook instructions p. 56 in Hollander and Wolfe (2nd ed.) or see

hi, i am looking for a way to correct for ties in the wilcoxon signed rank test -> e.g. wilcox.test(x,mu=.5) one way i have heard of is to look up the p value in a table that has been produced by Buck (1975). obviously i need to know the T-value to do that -> how do i get the T-value from the wilcox.test() function. is there any other (already implemented) way to correct for ties in

Full_Name: David Wooff Version: 1.7.0 OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu Submission from: (NULL) (129.234.4.10) wilcox.test exits with error message when confidence interval required, under some situations. I suspect this occurs when the data contain a zero and for some data lengths only: print(wilcox.test(c(2,1,4,3,6,-5,0),conf.int=T)) fails print(wilcox.test(c(2,1,4,3,6,-5,0,1),conf.int=T)) works

I just remembered an anomalous result that I stumbled upon whilst tweaking the command-line options to llvm-gcc. Specifically, the -msse3 flag does a great job improving the performance of floating point intensive code on the SciMark2 benchmark but it also degrades the performance of the int-intensive Monte Carlo part of the test: $ llvm-gcc -Wall -lm -O3 *.c -o scimark2 $ ./scimark2 Using