similar to: Questions about glmms.

Dear R-listers, I am working with generalized linear mixed models to quantify the variance due to two nested random factors, but have hit a snag in the interpretation of variance components. Despite my best efforts with Venables & Ripley 2002, Fahrmeir & Tutz 2001, R-help archives, Google, and other eminent sources (i.e. local R gurus), I have not been able to find a definitive answer

I am trying to find a way to analyze a "simple" mixed model with two levels of a treatment, a random blocking factor, and (wait for it) negative binomial count distributions as the response variable. As far as I can tell, the currently available R offerings (glmmGibbs, glmmPQL in MASS, and Jim Lindsey's glmm code) aren't quite up to this. From what I have read (e.g.

Three related questions on LMEs and GLMMs in R: (1) Is there a way to fix the dispersion parameter (at 1) in either glmmPQL (MASS) or GLMM (lme4)? Note: lme does not let you fix any variances in advance (presumably because it wants to "profile out" an overall sigma^2 parameter) and glmmPQL repeatedly calls lme, so I couldn't see how glmmPQL would be able to fix the dispersion

Here is a summary of responses to my original email (see my query at the bottom). Thank you to Achim Zeileis , Anders Nielsen, Pierre Kleiber and Dave Fournier who all helped out with advice. I hope that their responses will help some of you too. ***************************************** Check out glm.nb() from package MASS fits negative binomial GLMs.

Dear All, I am analysing a dataset on levels of herbivory in seedlings in an experimental setup in a rainforest. I have seven classes/categories of seedling damage/herbivory that I want to analyse, modelling each separately. There are twenty maternal trees, with eight groups of seedlings around each. Each tree has a TreeID, which I use as the random effect (blocking factor). There are two

Dear R-ers, I am just a simple 'end-user' of R and am trying to analyse data with a binary response variable (dead or alive) in relation to weight and sex (of young birds). As some of the birds have the same biological mother, I am using mixed models with the identity of the mother as a random factor. (please, Mick Crawley, when are you going to write a chapter on mixed models with binary

Dear R-ers, I am just a simple 'end-user' of R and am trying to analyse data with a binary response variable (dead or alive) in relation to weight and sex (of young birds). As some of the birds have the same biological mother, I am using mixed models with the identity of the mother as a random factor. (please, Mick Crawley, when are you going to write a chapter on mixed models with binary

Hi there, I have a question about the GLMM that I'm doing, that a statistician friend suggested I should have for my analysis. I would like to know if there's any way of obtaining a p value and R square for the full model (and not each variable separately) as to asses whether this model is somewhat appropriate or not. Can one do this for a GLMM in the lme4 package? The other thing I

Dear R-users, A recent post (Feb 16) to R-help inquired about fitting a glmm with a negative binomial distribution. Professor Ripley responded that this was a difficult problem with the simpler Poisson model already being a difficult case: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2005-February/064708.html Since we are developing software for fitting general nonlinear random effects models we

In a GLMM, one compares the conditional model including covariates with the unconditional model to see whether the conditional model fits the data better. (1) For my unconditional model, a different random effects term fits better (independent random effects) than for my conditional model (correlated random effects). Is this very uncommon, and how can this be explained? Can I compare these models

Hello there This is the first time I have used r-help message board so I hope I have got the right address. I am trying to check the residuals of a GLMM model(run using the package lme4). I have been able to check the residiuals of REMLs in lme4 using the following: m1<-lmer(vTotal~Week+fCollar+ (1|fCat), collars) res<-resid(m1) plot(res) qqnorm(res) library(MASS) par(mfrow=c(2,3))

Dear R gurus I am running a GLMM that looks at whether chimpanzees spend time in shade more than sun (response variable 'y': used cbind() on counts in the sun and shade) based on the time of day (Time) and the availability of shade (Tertile). I've included some random factors too which are the chimpanzee in question (Individual) and where they are in a given area (Zone). There are

Sort of a warning before I start: This post may be considered to describe a rather amateurish approach to distributing software which may annoy some people, but I sincerely hope it doesn't. I've been working for some years with David Clayton on a project which started life as an S package but has now turned into an R library. It is (now) called GLMMGibbs and estimates the parameters of

Hi everyone, I'm trying to fit a generalized linear mixed effects model (logistic) in R and am having some trouble specifying the covariance structure for the random effects. I'm using glmer, which by default assumes an unstructured relationship between the random effects, but I want the structure to be a multiple of an identity. Here is my code: glmer(y ~ 1 + (x1 + x2 + x3 + x4

I'm fitting generalized linear mixed models to using several fixed effects (main effects and a couple of interactions) and a grouping factor (site) to explain the variation in a dichotomous response variable (family=binomial). I wanted to compare the output I obtained using PROC GLIMMIX in SAS with that obtained using lmer in R (version 2.6.1 in Windows). When using lmer I'm specifying

DSIC?18 ? The 2018 International Conference on Digital Science 19 ? 21 October 2018, Montenegro https://digscience.org/ <https://digscience.org/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SCOPE DSIC?18 ? The 2018 International Conference on Digital Science, to be held at Montenegro, 19 ? 21 October 2018, is an

DSIC?18 ? The 2018 International Conference on Digital Science 19 ? 21 October 2018, Montenegro https://digscience.org/ <https://digscience.org/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SCOPE DSIC?18 ? The 2018 International Conference on Digital Science, to be held at Montenegro, 19 ? 21 October 2018, is an

* Proceedings by Springer ** Indexed in Scopus, ISI, DBLP, etc. __________________________________________________ DSIC?18 ? The 2018 International Conference on Digital Science 19 ? 21 October 2018, Montenegro https://digscience.org/ <https://digscience.org/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SCOPE

** Indexed in Scopus, ISI, DBLP, etc. * Proceedings by Springer __________________________________________________ DSIC?18 ? The 2018 International Conference on Digital Science 19 ? 21 October 2018, Montenegro https://digscience.org/ <https://digscience.org/> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SCOPE

Goal: use GEE or GLMM to analyze repeated measures data in R GEE problem: can?t find a way to do GEE with negative binomial family in R GLMM problem: not sure if I?m specifying random effect correctly Study question: Does the interaction of director and recipient group affect rates of a behavior? Data: Animals (n = 38) in one of 3 groups (life stages): B or C. Some individuals (~5)