similar to: Array problem

Hi everyone, I have made an announcements few weeks ago about auth_generator. As we released few versions since, I send another one on the list. The auth_generator gives you an admin interface to handle users, can display user informations on static pages, allows you to choose what crypting algo you want to use (you can use a salt per account if you want for better security) and much more. You

I''m new ot rails and am revamping one of my first rails projects and would like some advice on user authentication and management. In my app I implemented the basic user login functionality as it is in the Agile Web Developement book. Though it works great I''d like a bit more functionality such as: user levels/roles (i.e level1, level2, level3, admin) type permission,

Hello all, Thank you for your help in advance.I am working with the auth_generator and see that the "roles" are domains. I am unsure how to add domains to the system and then control who is in what domain. Any help with this or an explanation of how domains work is greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Robert Dempsey -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I have a site in development where I only want specific users to access specific items that uses belongs_to and has_many. Say we have this kind of structure. Person <belongs_to + has_many> Items When person logged in they only have access to items that belongs to him/her. I''m using auth_generator but only seem to put an auth inside controllers and dont know how to go any

Hello, I want to allow some users to manage other user accounts, but do not want them to manage the admin account. I have tried auth_generator, login_engine and user_engine I am having a hard time gettign this to work. Looking for advise and help. Thanks Frank -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi All, I am trying to use the auth_generator package and am having problems with the GD requirements. So, while I realize this is tangental to rails, I am hoping someone may have some insight for me. I get the following error when trying to update my account info: MissingSourceFile in Account#info no such file to load -- GD RAILS_ROOT: script/../config/.. Application Trace | Framework

Hi team, I''m a very newbie RoR user from Spain and I''m developing a blog''s CMS. Why RoR?, coz I think it''s an amazing framework with many posibilities, portable and really powerful, with a young and optimist community, and taking my project I''ve prefered his structure in front of LAMP. Another thing is that I''ve liked to surprise my masters

On 01/08/2019 11:36 AM, Ian Tessier via Release-testers wrote: > Can the ubuntu tarballs be published to the download site? They're not available yet. > These are up on the download site now. -Tom > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 7:38 AM Brian Cain via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Ubuntu and SLES tarballs

When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests. At least some of the msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is available on this platform. I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back. Is the minimum required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8? When I tried rc1 on

> Test suite is green but I'm seeing two libc++ test failures when running check-all. What tests are failing? On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Nikola Smiljanic via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Uploaded Fedora and openSUSE binaries. Test suite is green but I'm seeing > two libc++ test failures when running check-all. I'm pretty sure these were >

It's a test for the new interceptor for prlimit. It could be disabled with __GLIBC_PREREQ for 2.13+. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > +Evgenii for msan. > > I suspect the community simply doesn't keep track of what glibc > version is required :-/ > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at

Hi, No major issues seen so far for mips. Binaries uploaded. SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc3-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz)= 6e4fab79cc341a9084dab94cced108daff39fcde14a11e8d7ae454e9f92cb77c SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc3-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz)= 54887a039d3d7ccff17a0c7245f4c9d778a1c22f96b619db554849da55293d61 SHA256(clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz)=

Hi Hans, I'm seeing one unexpected failure: libc++ :: std/input.output/stream.buffers/streambuf/streambuf.protected/streambuf.put.area/pbump2gig.pass.cpp Test logs show: Standard Error: -- terminating with uncaught exception of type std::length_error: basic_string -- but only on my big endian MIPS machine. I have filed PR36373 for the above failure. I've looked at the failures

We're now using it as the main compiler in the OpenMandriva development builds -- no issues so far (after rebuilding a couple of key packages for testing). ttyl bero On 17 January 2018 at 18:53, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. > > I know there are still open

Hi, I had a quick look at that link and it seems to be a linker internal error. Presumably we're triggering a bug in the system toolchain. FWIW, my mipsel build on a Debian Jessie machine (binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1) successfully completed test-release.sh. I'm currently running the tests. Here's the relevant bit of the log from your link: cd

Ubuntu and SLES tarballs uploaded. I haven't had a chance to make a SLES12 build yet, but I will try in the coming days. f7553a0d66092ca0bbe1eab2af405523a18bafba clang+llvm-7.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-18.04.tar.xz 41db01a3b216df4fc22fae9c44e248889f9a01ed clang+llvm-7.0.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-16.04.tar.xz caf149635742622a3a5b220146ff34f9202b8670

I'm not aware of a bug filed for this, so please file one. I don't know much about the workings of test-suite myself, though. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Much or all of "Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_*.test" (254 failures) seem to be > failing for me with SIGILL. I'm guessing that my host CPU doesn't support

On 03/29/2018 08:09 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can > begin testing. > So far, I've only received 5.0.2-rc2 binaries from 2 testers. I am guessing this is due to the mix up with -rc1 and the fact that we don't normally do X.Y.2 releases. If you would like to test this release

Thanks! Can you post the sha1's for the files you uploaded? Windows and Mac look good. Uploaded: ca26fbfabb54ac1f70776ab3a5503313ec518f18 clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz 26d616e1355dc0802f90babbd5ea0b72abc0c0bb LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win32.exe 42363aeaff395d442f418d77b542a088b5b0658b LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win64.exe Thanks, Hans On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Diana Picus <diana.picus

Uploaded SLES11 and ubuntu 14.04. I can work on ubuntu 16.04 next. Is there any demand for ubuntu 17.10 releases? 4a0cb3e0ee573fb94e6c4f6be6c06eb661960471 clang+llvm-5.0.2-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz 90430f7f0058100265352b1b2a2cd57e55558f92 clang+llvm-5.0.2-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers < release-testers at