Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "erro in SVM (packsge "e1071")"
2005 May 19
2
tune.svm in {e1071}
Dear All ,
1- I'm trying to access the values of fitted(model) after model<- tune.svm( ) but seemingly it is not poosible. How can I access to values of fitted ? However ,it is possible only after model<- svm( )
2- How can I access to the other values such as the number of Support Vectors , gamma, cost , nu , epsilon , after model<- tune.svm( ) ? these are not possible?
I
2006 Jan 18
2
Help with plot.svm from e1071
Hi.
I'm trying to plot a pair of intertwined spirals and an svm that
separates them. I'm having some trouble. Here's what I tried.
> library(mlbench)
> library(e1071)
Loading required package: class
> raw <- mlbench.spirals(200,2)
> spiral <- data.frame(class=as.factor(raw$classes), x=raw$x[,1], y=raw$x[,2])
> m <- svm(class~., data=spiral)
> plot(m,
2005 Jun 28
2
svm and scaling input
Dear All,
I've a question about scaling the input variables for an analysis with svm (package e1071). Most of my variables are factors with 4 to 6 levels but there are also some numeric variables.
I'm not familiar with the math behind svms, so my assumtions maybe completely wrong ... or obvious. Will the svm automatically expand the factors into a binary matrix? If I add numeric
2005 Aug 11
1
How to insert a certain model in SVM regarding to fixed kernels
Dear David,
Dear R Users ,
Suppose that we want to regress for example a certain autoregressive model using
SVM. We have our data and also some fixed kernels in libSVM behinde e1071
in front. The question: Where can we insert our certain autoregressive
model ? During creating data frame ? Or perhaps we can make a
relationship between our variables ended to desired autoregressive model ?
2005 Apr 26
3
Error using e1071 svm: NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call
Hello,
As far I saw in archive mailing list, I am not the first person with this problem. Anyway I was not able to pass this error once the information I got from the archive it is not very conclusive for this case. I have used linear, radial and sigmoid kernels for the same data in the same conditions and everything is ok. This problem just happens with the polynomial kernel. I send the
2004 Dec 21
2
Rgui.exe - Error while tuning svm
Hello,
if I try to tune my svm with the code:
Tune <- tune.svm(Data.Train, Class.Train, type="C-classification",
kernel="radial", gamma = 2^(-1:1), cost = 2^(2:4))
i get a windows Messagebox with a error in the application "Rgui.exe" and
the message: "Die Anweisung in 0x6c48174d verweist auf Speicher 0x00000000.
Der Vorgang "read" konnte nicht auf
2005 Jul 22
2
setting weights for such a two-class problem in nnet and svm
Dear All,
I have such a two-class problem, one class is very large(~98% of total), and the other is just 2%. According to manual of nnet, I need setup "weights", so I intend to set 1 for class one, 49 for class 2. How do I do that? Just weights=49?
Meanwhile I'd like to try svm(e1071), again, how do I setup "class.weights"? Thanks.
BTW: Many thanks to Jake and Uwe for
2004 Dec 17
3
How to interpret and modify "plot.svm"?
Dear R people,
I am trying to plot the results from running svm in library(e1071). I
use plot.svm. After searching through the help archives and FAQ, I
still have several questions:
1. In default, crosses indicate support vectors. But why are there
two colors of crosses? What do they represent?
2. I want to draw a white-gray colored plot and modify the different
colored crosses or circles by
2011 Jul 17
3
cent0s-6 and virtualbox
I want to get a look at Cents-6
The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42
The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal
I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the same result
I boot from the CD (wich have been burned from an ISO downloaded from a Centos -6 repo).
The version is CentOS-6.0-i386-bin-DVD.iso
With each virtual machine I get this result at the beginning of the
2006 Feb 16
2
getting probabilities from SVM
I am using SVM to classify categorical data and I would like the
probabilities instead of the classification. ?predict.svm says that its
only enabled when you train the model with it enabled, so I did that, but it
didn't work. I can't even get it to work with iris. The help file shows
that probability = TRUE when training the model, but doesn't show an
example. Then I try to
2005 May 12
2
SVM linear kernel and SV
Dear all,
I'm a trainee statistician in a company and we'd like to understand svm
mechanism, at first with simple examples.
I use e1071 package and I have several questions. I'm working with data
extracted from cats data (from R). My dataset corresponds to a completely
separable case with a binary response variable ( Sex with 2 levels: F and
M), two explanatory variables (Bwt
2012 Mar 29
1
TR: [e1071] Load an SVM model exported with write.svm
Un texte encapsul? et encod? dans un jeu de caract?res inconnu a ?t? nettoy?...
Nom : non disponible
URL : <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20120329/cfdd2be3/attachment.pl>
2004 Dec 16
2
reading svm function in e1071
Hi,
If I try to read the codes of functions in e1071 package, it gives me following error message.
>library(e1071)
> svm
function (x, ...)
UseMethod("svm")
<environment: namespace:e1071>
> predict.svm
Error: Object "predict.svm" not found
>
Can someone help me on this how to read the codes of the functions in the e1071 package?
Thanks.
Raj
2012 Dec 02
1
e1071 SVM: Cross-validation error confusion matrix
Hi,
I ran two svm models in R e1071 package: the first without cross-validation
and the second with 10-fold cross-validation.
I used the following syntax:
#Model 1: Without cross-validation:
> svm.model <- svm(Response ~ ., data=data.df, type="C-classification",
> kernel="linear", cost=1)
> predict <- fitted(svm.model)
> cm <- table(predict,
2009 Jul 07
2
Question in using e1071 svm routine
Hi all,
I've got the following error message in using e1071 svm routine...
Could anybody please help me?
Thank you!
---------------------------------
model <- svm(y=factor(mytraindata[, 1]), x=mytraindata[, -1], probability=T)
Error in if (any(co)) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
In addition: Warning message:
In FUN(newX[, i], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion
2006 Feb 02
0
crossvalidation in svm regression in e1071 gives incorrect results (PR#8554)
Full_Name: Noel O'Boyle
Version: 2.1.0
OS: Debian GNU/Linux Sarge
Submission from: (NULL) (131.111.8.96)
(1) Description of error
The 10-fold CV option for the svm function in e1071 appears to give incorrect
results for the rmse.
The example code in (3) uses the example regression data in the svm
documentation. The rmse for internal prediction is 0.24. It is expected the
10-fold CV rmse
2011 Aug 05
1
e1071 ver 1.5-27 and older - SVM bug report
Dear All:
I found a problem with the SVM internal cross-validation (CV) accuracy
estimation in the e1071 package.
File: Rsvm.c
Line: 120
Today, it is:
int j = rand()%(prob->l-i);
Should be:
int j = i + rand()%(prob->l-i);
The erroneous code doesn't shuffle objects. Instead, it "randomly"
moves objects from beginning to the end.
In hope for a prompt response from the
2005 Jun 29
2
Running SVM {e1071}
Dear David, Dear Friends,
After any running svm I receive different results of Error estimation of 'svm' using 10-fold cross validation. What is the reason ? It is caused by the algorithm, libsvm , e1071 or something els? Which value can be optimal one ? How much run can reach to the optimality.And finally, what is difference between Error estimation of svm using 10-fold cross validation
2010 Jul 09
1
interpretation of svm models with the e1071 package
Dear all,
after having calibrated a svm model through the svm() command of the
e1071 package, is there a way to
i) represent the modeled relationships between the y and X variables
(response variable vs. predictors)?
ii) rank the influence of the predictors used in the model?
Right now I am more interested in regression models, but I guess this
would be useful for classification too.
Thank
2012 Mar 02
1
e1071 SVM: Cross-validation error confusion matrix
Hi,
I ran two svm models in R e1071 package: the first without cross-validation
and the second with 10-fold cross-validation.
I used the following syntax:
#Model 1: Without cross-validation:
> svm.model <- svm(Response ~ ., data=data.df, type="C-classification",
> kernel="linear", cost=1)
> predict <- fitted(svm.model)
> cm <- table(predict,