similar to: Multiple comparisons in a non parametric case

Dear all, I have a problem installing a package required by Hmisc on MacOS 10.3.5 with R 2.00. g77 -fno-common -g -O2 -c avas.f -o avas.o g77 -fno-common -g -O2 -c rlsmo.f -o rlsmo.o gcc -bundle -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -L/usr/local/lib -o acepack.so ace.o avas.o rlsmo.o -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin6.8/3.4.2

Dear list, I would like to plot the empirical cumulative distribution of the time needed by a treatment to attain a certain goal. A number of experiments is run with a strict time limit. In some experiments the goal is attained before the time limit, in other experiments time expires before the goal is attained. The situation is very similar to survivial analysis with censored data. I tryed

Hi, I would need to extend the Friedman test to a replicated design. Currently the function: friedman.test(y, ...) only works for unreplicated designs. I found in Conover 1999 "Practical Nonparamteric statistics" an extension of the formula to my case. Nevertheless, other sources, like Sheskin 2000 "Parametric and Nonparametric statistical Procedures" and Daniel 1990

Well fellow R users, I throw myself on your mercy. Help me, the unworthy, satisfy my employer, the ungrateful. My feeble ramblings follow... I've searched R-Help, the R Website and done a GOOGLE without success for a one way ANOVA procedure to analyse data that are both non-normal in nature and which exhibit unequal variances and unequal sample sizes across the 4 treatment levels. My

Hi, I'm trying to make sense of the options for multiple comparisons options in R. I've found the following options: pairwise.t.test, which provides standard t-tests, with options for choosing an appropriate correction for multiple comparisons TukeyHSD, which provides the usual Tukey test glht(package multcomp), which provides a variety of options >From the help list, it appears

My data looks like this: (treatments) T1 T2 T3 DK 8 5 3 JP 5 4 1 AS 9 7 4 MK 8 4 4 DK, JP, AS, and MK are 4 different people (blocks) I am using. This is my code

Hi! I have some data that looks like this up down percentaje uew_21 20 14 58.82 uew_20_5 27 40 40.29 uew_20 8 13 38.09 uew_19_5 17 42 28.81 So I have 4 experimental conditions and I am counting number of animals in the up and down compartment and the calculating the percentage, I want to know which one of the conditions is different from each other. If the data wouldn't be percentage

Dear r-helpers, I have a question about multiple testing. Here an example that puzzles me: All matrixes and contrast vectors are presented in treatment contrasts. 1. example: library(multcomp) n<-60; sigma<-20 # n = sample size per group # sigma standard deviation of the residuals cov1 <- matrix(c(3/4,-1/2,-1/2,-1/2,1,0,-1/2,0,1), nrow = 3, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE, dimnames =

I am trying to do a Nonparametric Tukey-type multiple comparison post-hoc test to determine which groups are significantly different. I have read the dialogue on this topic from the R-help, and am still not clear why no statistical packages include this test as an option? Is it not an appropriate test to conduct on non-normally distributed data? Is the only option to calculate it by hand

I am interested in a statistical comparison of multiple (5) time series' generated from modeling software (Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran). The model output simulates daily bacteria concentration in a stream. The multiple time series' are a result of varying our representation of the stream within the model. Our main question is: Do the different methods used to represent a

Hello. We have a question concerning the nonparametric analysis of a dataset, which resulted in rejection of the null hypothesis (Kruskal-Wallis-test = H-test). In order to find out which sample means actually are statistically different, we want to do multiple comparisons with the Wilcoxon rank sum test (= U-test); the p-level should be corrected according to Bonferroni-Holm. Thus we decided to

Hello- I have run an ANOVA on 4 treatments with unequal sample sizes (n=9,7,10 and 10). I want to determine where my sig. differences are between treatments using a Bonferroni test, and have run the code: pairwise.t.test(Wk16, Treatment, p.adf="bonf") I receive an error message stating that my arguments are of unequal length: Error in tapply(x, g, mean, na.rm = TRUE) :

Hello, the title says it all. I have an ANOVA model with "Error" term and the functions TukeyHSD or those from the "multcomp" package seem not to work with such a model. Assuming that the object returned from aov() function with multiple strata is a list of aov objects, I tried something like TukeyHSD(aov.1$Within), but this does not work either. Does somebody have a

I am not sure if my message made it through, so here it is again! Hi Rer's, R-1.1.0 I have two questions for you: 1) I am trying to complete a multiple comparison test after completing a one-way ANOVA on some data. I think this is pretty reasonable. aov(MetricSubset ~ GeneNameFactor) works pairwise.t.test(MetricSubset,GeneNameSubset,p.adjuxt.method=bonferroni,p ool.sd=FALSE)

Dear list, I?m wondering if there is something analogous to the TukeyHSD function that could be used for parametric terms in a GAM. I?m using the mgcv package to fit models that have some continuous predictors (modeled as smooth terms) and a single categorical predictor. I would like to do post hoc test on the categorical predictor in the models where it is significant. Any suggestions?

Hallo, is there any extension of the pairwise Wilcoxon test to a dependent samples layout with replicates (or, in other terms, a one-way layout with blocking and replicates)? The Wilcoxon method with matched pairs works for the case of dependent samples with one observation per block, while the Mann-Whitney test works for independent samples, thus one single block and replicated observations. Is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi. I have been using SAS for some time, and now I have discovered R. I am very happy with it, but I have not found out how to perform some of the multiple comparisons I was used to do in SAS. With the SAS/STAT, I generally used the MEANS (for comparison of arithmetic means) and the LSMEANS (for adjusted means) statements of the GLM procedure (I

Hello Prof. Harrell and dear R-help mailing list, I wish to perform a non-parametric repeated measures anova. If what I read online is true, this could be achieved using a mixed Ordinal Regression model (a.k.a: Proportional Odds Model). I found two packages that seems relevant, but couldn't find any vignette on the subject: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/repolr/

I am new to R. I'm using the function GAM and wanted to get standard errors and p-values for the parametric terms (I fitted a semi-parametric models). Using the function anova() on the object from GAM, I only get p-values for the nonparametric terms. Does anyone know if and how to get standard errors for the parametric terms? Thanks. Jean G. Orelien

Hi R-people, I performed controlled experiments to evaluated the seeds germination of two palms under four levels of water treatments. I conducted a generalized linear model (GLM) with a Poisson distribution to verify whether there were significant differences in the number of seed germination (NS-count variable) between treatments and species (explanatory variables). Thus, my model and output