similar to: Enumeration in R

Is there a means to split a vector into its individual elements without going the brute-force route for arguments to a predefined function call? offred.rgb <- c(1, 0, 0) * 0.60; ## Brute force style offred.col <- rgb(offred.rgb[1], offred.rgb[2], offred.rgb[3], names = "offred") ## Desired style

On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > search.path <- > function(fn, > paths = strsplit(Sys.getenv("PATH"), split = ";")[[1]], > fsep = "\\") { > for(d in paths) { > f <- file.path(d, fn, fsep = fsep) > if (file.exists(f)) > return(f) > } > return(NULL) > } >

Anyone aware of tools available that can provide complexity metrics and/or code coverage analysis for R source? ---------------------------------------------------------- SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)

R 2.1.0/src/include from 2005/04/18 download Naming inconsistent for guards as well but that's pedantic. Simple convention: file <foo.h> #ifndef R_FOO_H file <R_ext/bar.h> #ifndef R_EXT_BAR_H Missing guards: <IOStuff.h> <Internal.h> <Parse.h> <R_ext/GraphicsBase.h> <R_ext/GraphicsDevice.h> <R_ext/GraphicsEngine.h>

Had been looking into Luke Tierney's R_AllocatePtr() and was left with a question about exactly when does R reclaim heap memory. Implication of 'simpleref.nw' is that one can allocate C data on the R heap, and as long as pointer object is alive, the data and pointer will remain valid. But it calls allocString() which is implemented using R_alloc(). 'Writing R Extensions" says

Is there a canonical means to apply a function over multiple arrays simultaneously? For example, if I wanted to plot each line with a different color? Or is a for loop conversion my best option? x <- seq(0, 8, by = 2) y <- matrix(1:15, nrow = 5, byrow = TRUE) my.colors <- heat.colors(3) drawLines <- function(row) { lines(x, row) # want corresponding 'my.colors' here }

Needed to redefine function "sum" for my MATLAB package. There's something similar in Chambers's Green Book (pg 351) so I modified it as such: library(methods) setGeneric("sum", function(x, ..., na.rm = FALSE) { if (nDotArgs(...) > 0) sum(c(sum(x, na.rm = na.rm), sum(..., na.rm = na.rm))) else standardGeneric("sum") })

I'm translating some Matlab code and need some help figuring out how to change this call into an S4 generic method. In matlab, there's a function called 'repmat' with three calling sequences (all I have to deal with anyway): 1) B = repmat(A, m, n) 2) B = repmat(A, [m n]) 3) B = repmat(A, n) In all cases, A is the fill value, m is number of rows, and n is number of

Hallo, does a package for Matlab exist in R? If yes, where can I find it and how can I install it under R? Thanks, Corinna

Hi, I'm trying to get C code working with R. This is my first time writing C on Windows and I'm making a mess of it. Help! I'm following the example in Roger Peng's "An Introduction to the .C interface to R". The C code is: #include <R.h> void hello(int *n){ int i; for(i=0; i < *n; i++) { Rprintf("Hello, world!\n"); } } I seem to be unable

Dear all, Maybe, I am doing something wrong, but using R-2.5.0 on my Intel-Mac, I have problems using function callNextMethod() in method initialize. I am loading the following code as file "testS4.R": setClass("baseClass", representation(myname = "character", mydir = "character", "VIRTUAL"),

Hi, > R.version.string [1] "R version 2.0.1, 2004-11-15" I have found two possible bugs in function validObject. Details below. Cheers, Scott ================================== Scott D. Chasalow Principal Statistician Statistical Genetics and Biomarkers Bristol-Myers Squibb Company Email: scott.chasalow <AT> bms.com ================================== ------ BEGIN R

Folks: (This is a question on the formal S4 class system). R 2.1.1 on Windows. I'm pretty sure the following is a failure of my understanding, rather than a bug, so may I ask for some clarification? The Green book states that (p. 295) "Objects are checked for validity when permanently assigned, or explicitly by the function validObject()." The Help for setValidity() seems silent

Dear all Below is the code for "scriptPreFilter.R" which gives the following result: > source("scriptPreFilter.R") > prefltr <- new("PreFilter", mad=c(0.5,0.01)) [1] "------initialize:PreFilter------" [1] "------initialize:Filter------" > str(prefltr) Formal class 'PreFilter' [package ".GlobalEnv"] with 2 slots

Does anyone know if Hastie's gene shaving method is implemented in R Thanks, Aimin

Hi Kevin, >>>>> "krc" == krc <krc at odin.mdacc.tmc.edu> >>>>> on Mon, 27 Jun 2005 21:55:37 +0200 (CEST) writes: krc> Full_Name: Kevin R. Coombes krc> Version: 2.1.0 krc> OS: Windows XP krc> Submission from: (NULL) (143.111.224.169) krc> When revC = TRUE and RowSideColors is set to a list of krc>

Hi, Is there a way to turn off the automatic inclusion of "./" at the beginning of a path specified in an \SweaveInput{} instruction? I'd like to create some reusable "template modules" of Sweave code and put them in a standard directory like /Resources/Affymetrix Then the corresponding file that uses one of these would include a command like

Hi, When called with complete=TRUE, validObject() is supposed to work in a recursive manner. But here is a situation where it doesn't seem to be the case. Let's define a class with a validity method: setClass("PosInts", representation(ii="integer")) setValidity("PosInts", function(object) { if (!all(object at ii > 0))

How would one go about getting sprintf to use the values of a vector without having to specify each argument individually? > v <- c(1, 2, -1.197114, 0.1596687) > iv <- c(3, 1, 2, 4) > sprintf("%9.2f\t%d\t%d\t%8.3f", v[3], v[1], v[2], v[4]) [1] " -1.20\t1\t2\t 0.160" Essentially, desired effect would be something like: >

Hello, Thomas Stabla (statho3@web.de) has already sent this question to R-help, Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:21:31 +0100, but we are not sure whether we should better post this mail to this audience than to R-help: --------------------------------------------------------------------- We are using S4-classes and want to force a validity check when an object is created. How can this be done, when an