similar to: Question about building library and BLAS

On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 09:57:32AM -0400, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 03:02:21PM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just tagged the first release candidate for the > > 3.4.1 release, so testers may begin testing. Please refer to > > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html for information on how to > > validate a release.

Hello, after qmail migration need convert some .procmailrc scripts. Found converter procmail -> sieve, but i'm not sure of quality of conversion. My script: --------------- if header :contains "from" ["user at domain1.tld", "user2 at domain2.tld", "user3 at domain3.tld"] { redirect "foo1 at bar.tld"; redirect "foo2 at

While builds and validations of R-1.6.2beta_2002-12-20 were successful on several systems, there were a few failures: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apple Darwin 6.2 (MacOS 10.2.2) with gcc-3.2.1: gcc -dynamiclib -flat_namespace -undefined suppress -o .libs/libgslcblas.0.0.0.dylib sasum.lo saxpy.lo ... isamax.lo izamax.lo xerbla.lo -lc -install_name

Dear all, I have a problem to build a package on Windows XP while there is no problem on Linux. The Makefile is something like: ########### LIBNAME=cts PKG_LIBS = $(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS) $(FLIBS) OBJS=file1.o ... file20.o -llapack -lblas $(LIBNAME)$(SHLIB_EXT): $(OBJS) $(SHLIB_LD) $(SHLIB_LDFLAGS) -o $@ $(OBJS) $(FLIBS) clean: @rm -f *.o *.$(SHLIB_EXT) realclean: clean

Hello. I am a Linux neophyte and know almost nothing ?about compiling, so I would appreciate any help and advice y'all would care to offer. I am trying to compile the 64 bit version of R using a tuned ATLAS and LAPACK (ATLAS 3.9.24). I am running Ubunto 10.04 LTS (through wubi, FWIW). The ATLAS and LAPACK files (atlas.so, f77blas.so, lapack.so, and cblas.so) are sitting in the folder

Hi, I want to use R_qsort_int_I() in my C function, but getting the following error. It looks like there is a conflict between Rmath.h, which I use to generate random numbers, and R_ext/Boolean.h I would appreciate any help to fix this problem. gcc -ansi -g -o Gibbs gibbs.c subroutines.o rand.o vector.o -lm -lRmath -llapack -lblas -lfrtbegin -lg2c -lm -shared-libgcc In file included from

Dear All, I am building R from source[1], following what is done in "rules" for building Debian's R. But the R I generate, in contrast to the standard Debian's R, will not change the BLAS and LAPACK libraries it uses when I change them via "update-alternatives". I have no idea what I am doing wrong (but, somehow, I've been quite capable of making the same

On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 12:49, Jeff Cohen wrote: > For the heck of it I tried upgrading to gcc 3.4.2 (from 3.3.3). It > didn't make a difference. So here are the failures for llvm-test. All > diffs are against the "native" output. > > ===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa > > cbe failed differently from jit/llc. First cbe: > > 84c84

Fair enough... The following tests under MultiSource fail: Benchmarks/Olden/power Benchmarks/OptimizerEval Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks Benchmarks/MallocBench/perl Applications/sgefa However, they also fail in the exact same way without my change. OptimizerEval appears to be non-deterministic; it produces different output each time it runs. Everything else passes. I also compared a few *.s files

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 13:53:11 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 12:49, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > > > ===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa > > > sgefa is a known XFAIL. See the nightly test results over the last > several months. Actually, you should compare your test results with the > 1.3 release test results

Hi everyone, I just built the latest llvm/llvm-gcc yesterday and got a ton of test failures that look like the following ([i686-off-opt] means an i686 Release build of official -- unmodified -- sources): [i686-off-opt]: ./llvm.official/projects/llvm-test/DiffOutput.sh "/ptmp/dag/build.llvm.official/Release/bin/fpcmp -r 0.016" llc sse.isamax [i686-off-opt]: ******************** TEST

Hello; I was able to build and install llvm(3.0) under Ubuntu 11.10 (using the ./configure script found under llvm source, and then make and make install). While configuring, I gave --prefix as a directory where I would like llvm to be installed. I did not give --with-llvmgccdir and the --enable-optimized argument to configure. Because 3.0 doesn't come with llvmgcc source/binaries and I

For the heck of it I tried upgrading to gcc 3.4.2 (from 3.3.3). It didn't make a difference. So here are the failures for llvm-test. All diffs are against the "native" output. ===================== MultiSource/Applications/sgefa cbe failed differently from jit/llc. First cbe: 84c84 < One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879153e+02. --- > One-Norm(A) ---------- 8.879156e+02.

(I asked an earlier question on the rpy2 installation to the rpy2 list, the solution there was to edit the setup.py script, but this looks beyond what I can do unless someone tells me exactly what to modify). I have R 2.8.1 on 2 machines running ubuntu 8.04 (packages R-base and R-base-dev, among others, installed using Synaptic) and while the installation of rpy2 went fine on machine1, failed on

Dear developeRs, I'm trying to build R (2.7.1, on an x86_64 running Linux, but I believe I have observed this on x86 and with earlier versions of R as well) using external BLAS and LAPACK libraries _and_ generating libR.so, libRblas.so and libRlapack.so. Without --enable-BLAS-shlib, configure is able to find and use the external LAPACK library: ./configure \

Hi, I have just tagged the first release candidate for the 3.4.1 release, so testers may begin testing. Please refer to http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html for information on how to validate a release. If you have any questions or need something clarified, just email the list. For the 3.4.1 release we want to compare test results against 3.4-final. I have added support to the

Hi there, I'm trying to install the package RcppArmadillo in my R 2.11.1 which I installed and regularly update via Ubuntu's repositories. When I try to install RcppArmadillo from CRAN I get: > install.packages('RcppArmadillo', lib='~/myRlibs') [...] g++ -shared -o RcppArmadillo.so RcppArmadillo.o fastLm.o -L/home/matias/myRlibs/Rcpp/lib -lRcpp

Hi, I want to install "Matrix" using > install.packages("Matrix") After a while I get: checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for ATL_xerbla in -latlas... no checking for dgemm_ in -lcxml... no checking for dgemm_ in -ldxml... no checking for dgemm_ in -lscs... no checking for dgemm_ in -lcomplib.sgimath... no checking

I can't compile R-alpha on AMD 64. Rather than include a 1400 line script I have put it on the web http://www.stat.umn.edu/~charlie/typescript.txt way down near the bottom it fails building lapack.so gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib64 -o lapack.so Lapack.lo -llapack -lblas -lg2c -lm -lgcc_s /usr/lib64/gcc-lib/x86_64-suse-linux/3.3.5/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:

Normally, I do the following to configure R for compilation on my Opteron box with ACML installed: ./configure --with-tcltk --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml" However, when I do so, and look at Makeconf, I see BLAS_LIBS = -lblas I thought I would see BLAS_LIBS = -L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml Why isn't Makeconf picking up the right BLAS_LIBS (or is