similar to: results from t-test

Today's episode of "why is AD break", brought to you by: > [2017/09/05 10:17:06.015617, 3] ../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:613(gensec_gssapi_update) > Server GC/graz-dc-1b.ad.tao.at/ad.tao.at is not registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): Server (GC/graz-dc-1b.ad.tao.at/ad.tao.at at AD.TAO.AT) unknown > [2017/09/05 10:17:06.015717, 0]

On 2017-04-20 18:38, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 18:00:24 +0200 > Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 2017-04-07 13:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: >>> In the end I just upgraded all DCs to 4.5 and remote-deleted the >>> broken ones. Seemed to work without a hitch, manual removal was >>> only necessary

Situation: Trying to upgrade Samba from 4.1 to 4.5 without disruption too much by adding new DCs and demoting old ones. After bringing online the first 4.5 DC, I ran `demote --remove-other-dead-server=` on that DC to remove one of the old 4.1 DCs (held no FSMO roles). That seemed to run fine (the DC had been offline for a few weeks at that point and I didn't want to restore it just for

Hai Sven, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sven Schwedas [mailto:sven.schwedas at tao.at] > Verzonden: dinsdag 5 september 2017 17:13 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Server GC/name.dom/dom is not > registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): > Server (GC/name/dom at DOM) unknown > > On

Hi all, I'd like to extract a value from an ANOVA table, but experience the following problem: ### This works: > s.pseudo <- summary(aov(m ~ block + mix*graz,data=split1)) > s.pseudo Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) block 2 1114.66 557.33 4.4296 0.04192 * mix 1 6.14 6.14 0.0488 0.82956 graz 2 1.45 0.72 0.0057 0.99427 mix:graz

> Keytabs look reasonable, as far as I can see, but why does > graz-dc-sem have the same SPN output as graz-dc-1b in > addition to its own? A snapshotted server/cloned server? I dont know but thats not correct. I suggest, cleanup the DS with FSMO roles. Then remove a failty server and re-add it as a new installed DC. ( the good DS with FSMO) First backup:

On 22.05.19 15:31, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Hai, > > Well, good that your more relax and releaved in pressure.. > Apoligies accepted. ;-), i know the fealing but do understand, we are trying to help out.. > > As you know, it very frustration to ask the same things again, and you showing them again > But now as you showed with all the configs. It is needed.. (sorry)

Once again, something with Samba thirty bazillion components broke. Once again, my choices for logging are "nothing" or "15 MB/s spread of ten different files, because 'client authentication failed' totally needs to be lower priority than malloc debug info". Once again, none of these messages is actually able to convey what broke, where, why. Why is it impossible for

Overall domain architecture hasn't changed since my spring cleanup post earlier (I did sort out the krb5 packages and logging settings, though). To start the migration, I figured I'd first update the file servers, since they're the least critical component. Upgrade 4.5 ? 4.8, 4.8 ? 4.9, 4.9 ? 4.10 seemed to work fine each step. However, SMB logins either with smbclient or with

> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version > Version 4.5.8-Debian > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error" > no error > root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sven Schwedas [mailto:sven.schwedas at tao.at] > Verzonden: vrijdag 8 september 2017 14:40 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Server GC/name.dom/dom is not > registered with our KDC: Miscellaneous failure (see text): > Server (GC/name/dom at DOM) unknown > > On 2017-09-08 10:37, L.P.H.

Hallo! Is there a possibility to plot a number line in R? I would like to display 3 different Intervals on the same number line. Ideally, it would be possible to add a name to each number (e.g. Interval 1, lower cut-off...and so on). I have not found a command for this. Thank you for your help. Julia [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I have just installed Slackware64 13.0 Linux as a HVM guest with Xen 3.5-unstable changeset 20143 pv-ops dom0 kernel 2.6.31.4. For more details, please refer to the following link: http://enmingteo.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/picture-tutorial-how-to-setup-slackware64-13-0-hvm-domu-with-xen-3-5-unstable-pv-ops-dom0-kernel-2-6-31-4-in-fedora-11-x86-64-dom0/ There are 83 screenshots so far at

Hi, I have just installed Slackware64 13.0 Linux as a HVM guest with Xen 3.5-unstable changeset 20143 pv-ops dom0 kernel 2.6.31.4. For more details, please refer to the following link: http://enmingteo.wordpress.com/2009/11/01/picture-tutorial-how-to-setup-slackware64-13-0-hvm-domu-with-xen-3-5-unstable-pv-ops-dom0-kernel-2-6-31-4-in-fedora-11-x86-64-dom0/ There are 83 screenshots so far at

On 2017-09-08 13:02, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:43:40 +0200 > Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 2017-09-08 12:26, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:03:53 +0200 >>> "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>>

On 2017-09-08 12:26, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 12:03:53 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Thanks Rowland, >> >> Very appriciated. >> The dnsmasq servers are explained, these are no problem in his setup >> sofar i could tell/see. >> > Yes, but do the dnsmasq servers

It's amazing how long Samba just keeps running even when apparently everything's broken. In preparation of finally upgrading our DCs to 41.0, I ran dbcheck on all of them, resulting in: graz-dc-sem: > Checking 3861 objects > Error: governsID CN=ucsUser,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,DC=tao,DC=at on 1.3.6.1.4.1.19414.3.2.2 already exists as an attributeId or governsId > Error:

Hi, I noticed some time ago that, for instance, named vectors that are really makes str() really slow when displaying the names attribute. I don't know exactly when this started, but it wasn't the case say 1-2 years ago. Example (on a WinXP 1.8GHz): > s <- 1:1000; names(s) <- s > system.time(str(s)) Named int [1:1000] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... - attr(*, "names")=

Dear All, I have created a virtual high performance computing (HPC) cluster of 6 compute nodes with MPICH2 using Xen-based Fedora 11 Linux 64-bit paravirtualized (PV) domU guests. Dom0 is Fedora 11 Linux 64-bit. My Intel Desktop Board DQ45CB has a single onboard Gigabit LAN network adapter. I am able to bring up the ring of mpd on the set of 6 compute nodes. However, I am consistently

Dear All, I have created a virtual high performance computing (HPC) cluster of 6 compute nodes with MPICH2 using Xen-based Fedora 11 Linux 64-bit paravirtualized (PV) domU guests. Dom0 is Fedora 11 Linux 64-bit. My Intel Desktop Board DQ45CB has a single onboard Gigabit LAN network adapter. I am able to bring up the ring of mpd on the set of 6 compute nodes. However, I am consistently