similar to: update/offset

Dear R crew: I am sorry this question has been posted before, but I can't seem to solve this problem yet. I have a simple dataset consisting of two variables: cestode intensity and chick size (defined as CAPI). Intensity is a count and clearly overdispersed, with way too many zeroes. I'm interested in looking at the association between these two variables, i.e. how well does chick

I have fitted the faults.data to glm.nb and to the function negbin from the package aod. The output of both is the following: summary(glm.nb(n~ll, data=faults)) Call: glm.nb(formula = n ~ ll, data = faults, init.theta = 8.667407437, link = log) Deviance Residuals: Min 1Q Median 3Q Max -2.0470 -0.7815 -0.1723 0.4275 2.0896 Coefficients:

I have tried glm.nb in the MASS package, but many models (I have 250 models with different combinations of predictors for fish counts data) either fail to converge or even diverge. I'm attempting to use the negbin function in the AOD package, but am unsure what to use for the "random" term, which is supposed to provide a right hand formula for the overdispersion parameter.

Hi, I wonder if predict.gam is supposed to work with family=negbin() definition? It seems to me that the values returned by type="response" are far off the observed values. Here is an example output from the negbin examples: > set.seed(3) > n<-400 > dat<-gamSim(1,n=n) > g<-exp(dat$f/5) > dat$y<-rnbinom(g,size=3,mu=g) >

Dear R crew: I think I am in the right mailing list. I have a very simple dataset consisting of two variables: cestode intensity and chick size (defined as CAPI). Intensity is clearly overdispersed, with way too many zeroes. I'm interested in looking at the association between these two variables, i.e. how well does chick size predict tape intensity? I fit a zero inflated negat. binomial

Hi, When modeling with negbin from the aod package, parameters for a given count y | lambda~Poisson(lambda) with lambda following a Gamma distribution Gamma(r, theta) are estimated. The intercept is called phi. Some other parameters may be also be estimated from factors in the data: the estimates returned for all these would be in accordance with the Value listing in the negbin entry in the aod

Dear R people, I am not sure if this is the correct place to tell about problems in evolving programmes, but it seems that the `summary.negbin' function of the excellent `MASS' library is now broken, and gives the following error message: > summary(hm) Error in summary.negbin(hm) : subscript out of bounds `summary.negbin' calls `summary.glm' which seems to work and give the

Hello, I am having some difficulty converting my gam code to a correct gamm code, and I'm really hoping someone will be able to help me. I was previously using this script for my overdispersed gam data: M30 <-gam(efuscus~s(mic, k=7) +temp +s(date)+s(For3k, k=7) + pressure+ humidity, family=negbin(c(1,10)), data=efuscus) My gam.check gave me the attached result. In order to

Hi there, I'm using presence-absence data in a gam (i.e. 0 or 1 as values) I am trying to run a gam with 'dummy covariates' i.e. 1~1 unfortunately my model: * model<-gam(1~1, data=bats, family=negbin)* keeps putting out: * Error in gam(1 ~ 1, data = bats, family = negbin) : Not enough (non-NA) data to do anything meaningful* Is there a specific reason it would do this? I have

Edward, you also can use the package aod on CRAN, see the help page of the function negbin. Best Matthieu An example: > library(aod) > data(dja) > negbin(y ~ group + offset(log(trisk)), ~group, dja, fixpar = list(4, 0)) Negative-binomial model ----------------------- negbin(formula = y ~ group + offset(log(trisk)), random = ~group, data = dja, fixpar = list(4, 0))

Dear R-collegues, I'm getting an error message (Error in round) when summarising a glm.nb model, and when using anova.negbin (in R 1.3.1 for windows): > m.nb <- glm.nb(tax ~ areal) > m.bn Call: glm.nb(formula = tax ~ areal, init.theta = 5.08829537115498, link = log) Coefficients: (Intercept) areal 3.03146 0.03182 Degrees of Freedom: 283 Total (i.e. Null); 282

Hi, I am new to R and has been depending mostly on the online tutotials to learn R. I have to deal with zero inflated negative binomial distribution. I am however unable to understand the following example from this link http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/r/dae/zinbreg.htm The result gives two blocks. *library(pscl) zinb<-zeroinfl(count ~ child + camper | persons, dist = "negbin", EM =

Dear Clara, Thanks for the reply. I am forwarding your message to the list, ok. When I wrote was a way of get further information to help the helpers. happy holidays, milton ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Clara Brück <clara_brueck@web.de> Date: 2009/12/30 Subject: Re: [R] Negbin Error Warnings To: milton ruser <milton.ruser@gmail.com> Dear Milton, Thanks for

Hello, I'm using pscl to run a hurdle model. Everything works great until I get to the point of making predictions. All of my "count" predictions are lower than my actual data, and lower than the "response" predictions, similar to the issue described here ( https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2012-August/320426.html) and here (

Hi, I ran a negative binomial regression (NBR) using the Zelig-package and the negbin model. When I then try to use the simumlation approach using the setx () and sim() functions to calculate expected values and first difference for different levels of one of my independent variables, I get 50 errors warnings, telling me that the calculation rpois produced NAs. However, the data I use

Hi all, First post for me here, but I have been reading on the forum for almost two years now. Thanks to everyone who contributed btw! I have a dataset of 4000 observations of count of a mammal and I am trying to predict abundance from a inflated-zero model as there is quite a bit of zeros in the response variable. I have tried multiple options, but I might do something wrong as every

Hello, I have a data frame with 1425 observations, 539 of which are zeros. I am trying to fit the following ZINB: f3<-formula(Nbr_Abs~ Zone * Year + Source) ZINB2<-zeroinfl(f3, dist="negbin", link= "logit", data=TheData, offset=log(trans.area), trace=TRUE) Zone is a factor with 4 levels, Year a factor with 27 levels, and Source a factor with 3 levels. Nbr_Abs is counts

Hi all, I am running the following model: > glm89.nb <- glm.nb(AvGUD ~ Year*Trt*Micro) where Year has 3 levels, Trt has 2 levels and Micro has 3 levels. However when I run it has a zero inflated negative binomial (as I have lots of zeros) I get the below error message: > Zinb <- zeroinfl(AvGUD ~ Year*Trt*Micro |1, data = AvGUD89, dist = "negbin") Error in optim(fn =

Hello, I am having a problem with the zero-inflated negative binomial (package pscl). I have 6 sites with plant populations, and I am trying to model the number of seeds produced as a function of their size and their site. There are a lot of zero's because many of my plants get eaten before flowering, thereby producing 0 seeds, and that varies by site. Because of that and because the

Hi all, Although I'm able to manage functions in R, because I'm writing my first package I'd like to optmize them, but I'm not so expert to do it and I spent a lot of my time without success. So I was wonder whether someone could give me some advice. Let the function myfn<-function(glm.obj,....){ #glm.obj is a glm object ..... class(out)<- c("myclass",class(obj))