similar to: Bundles and 1.9.0 (alpha)

Dear list member, by running Rcmd check on a package where a customised 'CITATION' file should be included instead of the automatically produced one, the following error occurs: adding build stamp to DESCRIPTION installing NAMESPACE file and metadata installing R files installing inst files FIND: Parameter format not correct make[2]: *** [c:/R/packages/urca/inst] Error 2 make[1]:

I am not sure if this is already known. I checked BUGS and found some references to similar behavior when R_HOME is set? Here is what I get: (1) Fresh build of 1.4.1 under Linux/RH-7.2. All tests pass. > R CMD check ctest * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory `/home/andyj/stat/R-1.4.1/library/ctest.Rcheck' Installing *source* package `ctest'

'R CMD build --binary BUNDLE' and Windows. When using R version 2.9.0 beta for 'R CMD build --binary CoCo' on Windows only the first package of the 'Contains' field of the bundle DESCRIPTION file ends up in the zip file. (Same result for the bundle 'VR' by R version 2.9.0 beta.) The check of the CoCo bundle version 0.1.7.5 by R version 2.9.0 beta is OK (on

Dear R developers, When building/checking my package (in R 2.6.1 under windows) I run into some messages that I do not completely understand and that do not give me precise enough leads to pinpoint where the error in my package is. I would be very grateful for any suggestions. Did anyone else encounter the same problem before? When building or installing the package, I get the message (no error

Re. the Kings Quest game called R, Inspired by the "stats4" of R-1.9.0 (alpha of 2004-03-15) I moved the body af my function ".onLoad.dynamicGraph" to the end of ".../dynamicGraph/R/dynamicGraph" (replacing "library(methods)" by "require(methods)"). The secound run, with [Previously saved workspace restored], produces the same result as in

Hola! I am doing some minimal changes on the package SenSrivastava to make it fit for R2.0.0 (This package passed Rcmd check on earlier versions of R, and are passing the CRAN daily checks!) I am using rw2000dev from CRAN. Now i get (running in an Xemacs shell): installing R.css in C:/R/rw2000dev/src/gnuwin32/SenSrivastava.Rcheck ---------- Making package SenSrivastava ------------ adding

Dear r-devel members, I tried to build R packages on a PC running Windows XP but experience problems. However, it is ok when there is no inst directory in a package. Any help would be appreciated. The following is an example, C:\work>R CMD check VR_7.2-19.tar.gz * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory 'C:/work/VR.Rcheck' * using R version 2.1.1, 2005-06-20 *

I have developed an R package that works under Win32, but when I attempt to build it on Win64, I get ERROR: loading failed for 'x64' More precisely, I developed and tested the package under Win32 and it works. But when I move to a 64 bit Windows 7 (Home Premium) system, and attempt to build both 32 bit and 64 bit packages, the 32 bit package seems to build, but the 64 bit build

Hello, I'm trying to create a source package (on Win2k system). I followed the instructions from R-extns.pdf, installed ActivePerl and RTools with setting the DOS path to it. Then I did "Rcmd check" and had an error: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ C:\R\rw2001\bin>Rcmd check D:/prime7/SpnInstall/spectrino * checking for working latex ...latex: not found NO * using log directory

Hi I am still trying to wrap up a package using Rcmd (in windows 2000 professional with R 1.8.1). I have made some progress - and now at least Rcmd check works - it still giving me an error message when it creates latex help files though. Thus I get: c:\rpack> Rcmd check test * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory 'C:/rpacks/test.Rcheck' * checking for file

I have a samll package that works well and complies nicly on WinXP, using R-2.4.1 Now I want to add a document so i make a folder inst\doc and put the .tex and .pdf in there. But the complation then crashes. Is this because the installin expects some file to be present in inst if an inst folder is there? This is how the thing progress is on my command promp:

Hi I have been trying to get the R Extention supportware going for a while now and have been running to an error I cannot figure out. I am hoping someone here will recognize whats going on and what i may be messing up. After installing all the components - Rtools, Active Perl, and minGW I created the file structure using package.skeleton(name = "test") with only the functions i want

> Hi there fellow R-Users, > > I am trying to use the "package.skeleton" to create my own package with > R.1.7.1 on Windows XP Professional. > I have followed the package.skeleton example and have downloaded the > necessary files found at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/Rtools/tools.zip. > > and perl5, available via

Dear All, I have been working on building a new version of the Wavethresh package for some time now. Having build a working version on Linux, I am getting the following error when checking on Windows: C:\Rpackages\R\rw2000\bin>Rcmd check wavethresh * checking for working latex ... OK * using log directory 'C:/Rpackages/R/rw2000/bin/wavethresh.Rcheck' * checking for file

Hi dears, I have difficulty to build a package ! I use Windows XP HOME, with and Intel PVI 2.66Ghz processor and 512MB of memory I use RCMD check pyra1 and I got this : * using log directory 'C:/DOCS/R/pyra1.Rcheck' * using * checking for file 'pyra1/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * checking extension type ... Package * this is package 'pyra1' version '1.0' * checking if this

Hi, I have just updated R from version 2.8.1 to version 2.9.1. I am running Windows XP Professional, Service Pack 3. With the update, I decided to update a set of packages that I maintain by compiling them for the new version. Everything worked fine except for one package. This package is unique (among the six I was working on) in that is stored on a UNIX-based file server that is

In version 2.8.1, running Rcmd check on the package foo would leave the file foo-manual.tex in the folder foo.Rcheck. But as of 2.9.0 only foo-manual.pdf and foo-manual.log are there. Is this intentional? Anyway it is inconvenient, because I would occasionally like to include the manual at the end of a set of exercises, and this was a convenient file to \input with a few select %'s added.

Has anyone successfully used Rcmd install or Rcmd check on Windows Vista? I have been successfully been running R itself, just not Rcmd install and Rcmd check. Rcmd check fails, the Ryacas.Rcheck it creates is read-only, I don't have permission to delete it and I have to reset the permissions on it just to delete it. With Rcmd install I am getting the following which looks like I am running

Hi, I am trying to make my own package in Windows XP with R 1.9.1. using Rcmd build/ Rcmd. The initial Rcmd build compiles ok with no error messages. However, when I run Rcmd check it runs ok up until * checking for file 'GammaTest/DESCRIPTION' ... OK * checking if this is a source package ... OK * checking whether package 'GammaTest' can be installed ... ERROR Installation

Dear Lister, I am working with Windows XP and R 2.1.0 and can check and build home-made packages easily (just *.r, *.rmd, *.rda files, no compiled code). However for some reasons, I cannot check or build the package 'foreign' from the source (I took it as an exercise...). After some lines of sentences OK (here omitted and replaced by ...), I get a message like this: RCMD check