similar to: memory problem for R

All Is there an R command to produce error bars around a plotted point. Crawley's book uses the command error.bar() but my version of R rejects it. Must be an S+ command(?). Thanks REX [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

posting the question in r-help@ to get more feedback :-) thanks, Yun-Fang ----- Original Message ----- From: "Yun-Fang Juan" <yunfang at yahoo-inc.com> To: <s-news at wubios.wustl.edu> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: [S] plot stacked bar chart in R > Hi, > I am trying to plot a stacked bar chart in R but am not able to find the > documentation.

Hi, I have a two-way anova with unequal cell numbers that I want to analyze. The problem is I don't have individual observations of the data. I only have the sufficient statistics (mean, variance, # of observations) for each cell. Is there any existing function in S-plus that would allow me to do aov() with the sufficient statistics? The table is like G1 G2 G3 G5 G6 T1 T2 T3

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> Hi Ben, these are a couple of patches that are in preparation for adding GV11B support. The fundamental issue that these are trying to solve is that the GV11B is the first Tegra incarnation of the GPU where the aperture really matters. All prior generations would accept any of them. For dGPUs we usually allocate memory in VRAM, so the default

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Not 100% sure that this is needed, but BSP/MPEG are in the mask. drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/nv50.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mc/nv50.c index 0cb322a..f25fc5f 100644 ---

Hi, I am trying to plot two distribution graph on one plot. But I dont know how. I set them to the same x, y limit, even same x, y labels. Code: x1=rnorm(25, mean=0, sd=1) y1=dnorm(x1, mean=0, sd=1) x2=rnorm(25, mean=0, sd=1) y2=dnorm(x2, mean=0, sd=1) plot(x1, y1, type='p', xlim=range(x1,x2), ylim=range(y1, y2), xlab='x', ylab='y') plot(x2, y2, type='p',

hi, all: i want to add a function in xen. in the function i need to call the "printk" to display the values of some variables. i found the definition of printk() in file "xen-3.1.0-src\xen\include\xen\lib.h ": extern void printk(const char *format, ...) __attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 2))); who can tell me the location of printk()? thanks in advance. 2008-04-26

Checked out the latest unstable version of Xen 4.4 but failed to create a PVHVM domU Configured Xen with ./configure --prefix=/usr DomU config file: name = "pvhvm" builder=''hvm'' device_model = ''qemu-xen'' memory = ''512'' vcpus = ''4'' pae=1 acpi=1 apic=1 vif = [ ''mac=00:16:3E:51:20:8C, bridge=xenbr0,

> ----- Original Message ----- >> Hi all, >> My recent commit r187027 fixed a simple oversight of forgetting to >> check for __ppc__ (only checking __powerpc__), which broke my >> powerpc-apple-darwin8 stage1 tests, since the system gcc only >> provided >> __ppc__. I was wondering if this justifies using simpler macros like >> >> #define

Hello, I have install Horde rpm with webmin: Instalando paquete(s) con el comando yum -y install yun grouinstall horde ... Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: centos.intergenia.de * epel: ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de * extras: centos.intergenia.de * updates: ftp.belnet.be Setting up Install Process No package yun available. No package grouinstall

Hi, Thanks for the quick reply again. > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 1:17 PM, David Fang <fang at csl.cornell.edu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've bootstrapped llvm/clang from svn-trunk on powerpc-darwin8 (g++-4.0.1), and >> have the following test results to share. >> Summary below, full log at: >>

Hi, > ----- Original Message ----- >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>> Hi all, >>>> My recent commit r187027 fixed a simple oversight of forgetting >>>> to >>>> check for __ppc__ (only checking __powerpc__), which broke my >>>> powerpc-apple-darwin8 stage1 tests, since the system gcc only >>>> provided

----- Original Message ----- > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> Hi all, > >> My recent commit r187027 fixed a simple oversight of forgetting > >> to > >> check for __ppc__ (only checking __powerpc__), which broke my > >> powerpc-apple-darwin8 stage1 tests, since the system gcc only > >> provided > >> __ppc__. I was

Hi, For anyone who might be interested, I've thrown together a little page to track my builds of llvm and clang, both release 3.0 and svn-trunk, on powerpc-darwin8. http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/ I'll update the list of logs each time I svn-update and build. It's nowhere as nice as a real buildbot page, but it's better than nothing. 3.0 still has over 20 test

Hello Tobias, Thank you for the suggestion! Aditya also mentioned this. I will look into it. Best regards, Ruijie Ruijie Fang Email: ruijief at princeton.edu On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:48 PM Tobias Hieta <tobias at plexapp.com> wrote: > Hello Ruijie, > > One other workload that would be interesting to test might be clang > itself. Building clang with PGO information is a

>> These results have far fewer failures than svn-trunk, and are also >> comparable to bootstrapping with gcc-4.6.2, summarized here: >> http://paste.lisp.org/display/126363 >> (Unfortunately, I no longer have the whole build/test log for the gcc46 bootstrap.) >> This consistency between different bootstraps of the release gives me >> some hope that g++-4.0.1 is

18.01.2012, 02:46, "David Fang" <fang at csl.cornell.edu>: > Hi, >          For anyone who might be interested, I've thrown together a little > page to track my builds of llvm and clang, both release 3.0 and > svn-trunk, on powerpc-darwin8. > > http://www.csl.cornell.edu/~fang/sw/llvm/ > > I'll update the list of logs each time I svn-update and

Full_Name: Dong-Yun Kim Version: 1.7.0/1.8.1 OS: WinMe/WinXP Submission from: (NULL) (4.33.147.192) Hi all, It appears that R has a problem with evaluating logical "==" operator. The following are a few examples I found: > 2.1+0.2==2.3 [1] FALSE > 2.7+0.1==2.8 [1] FALSE > 2.7+0.2==2.9 [1] FALSE > 3.1+0.2==3.3 [1] FALSE Thanks. Dong-Yun Kim

Hi all, My recent commit r187027 fixed a simple oversight of forgetting to check for __ppc__ (only checking __powerpc__), which broke my powerpc-apple-darwin8 stage1 tests, since the system gcc only provided __ppc__. I was wondering if this justifies using simpler macros like #define LLVM_PPC (defined(__ppc__) || defined(__powerpc__) ...) #define LLVM_PPC64 (defined(__ppc64__) ||

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:51:38PM +0400, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > > 18.01.2012, 02:46, "David Fang" <fang at csl.cornell.edu>: > > Hi, > > ?????????For anyone who might be interested, I've thrown together a little > > page to track my builds of llvm and clang, both release 3.0 and > > svn-trunk, on powerpc-darwin8. > > > >