similar to: Interrupt handling

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9000 matches similar to: "Interrupt handling"

2004 Jun 14
5
mkChar can be interrupted
Hi, As was discussed earlier in another thread and as documented in R-exts .Call() should not be interruptible by Ctrl-C. However the following code, which spends most of its time inside mkChar, turned out to be interruptible on RH-7.3 R-1.8.1 gcc-2.96: #include <Rinternals.h> #include <R.h> SEXP foo0(const SEXP nSexp) { int i, n; SEXP resSexp; if (!isInteger(nSexp))
2023 May 02
1
save.image Non-responsive to Interrupt
? Sat, 29 Apr 2023 00:00:02 +0000 Dario Strbenac via R-devel <r-devel at r-project.org> ?????: > Could save.image() be redesigned so that it promptly responds to > Ctrl+C? It prevents the command line from being used for a number of > hours if the contents of the workspace are large. This is ultimately caused by serialize() being non-interruptible. A relatively simple way to hang
2023 Apr 29
1
save.image Non-responsive to Interrupt
Hello, Could save.image() be redesigned so that it promptly responds to Ctrl+C? It prevents the command line from being used for a number of hours if the contents of the workspace are large. -------------------------------------- Dario Strbenac University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2050 Australia
2010 Sep 28
1
checking user interrupts in C(++) code
Hello, My problem is that I have an extension in C++ that can be quite time-consuming. I'd like to make it interruptible. The problem is that if I use the recommended R_CheckUserInterrupt() method I have no possibility to cleanup (e.g. free the memory). I've seen an old thread about this, but I wonder if there's a new and definitive answer. I just do not understand why a simple
2007 Feb 27
1
Checking for user interrupt in a .C() call without without triggering a non-local exit.
Hi, An R package on which I am working makes a series of very computationally-intensive and complex .C() calls, that I would like to make interruptible. However, calling R_CheckUserInterrupt() causes a non-local exit, so the memory allocated by malloc() is never freed. The way the code is structured, it might not be practical to replace all the malloc() calls with R_alloc() calls. The question
2019 Apr 30
2
Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
Hi All, I realize that this is not a really nice reprex, but anyone has an idea why a background R session would "remember" an interrupt (SIGINT) on Unix? rs <- callr::r_session$new() rs$interrupt() # just sends a SIGINT #> [1] TRUE rs$run(function() 1+1) #> Error: interrupt rs$run(function() 1+1) #> [1] 2 It seems that the main loop somehow stores the SIGINT it
2023 Feb 11
1
scan(..., skip=1e11): infinite loop; cannot interrupt
On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 23:38:55 -0600 Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > I have a 4.54 GB file that I'm trying to read in chunks using > "scan(..., skip=__)". It works as expected for small values of > "skip" but goes into an infinite loop for "skip=1e11" and similar > large values of skip: I cannot even interrupt it; I
2003 Oct 10
4
1.8.0 on Unix: interrupting huge print()s ??
NEWS for R 1.8.0 has >> USER-VISIBLE CHANGES >> >> <......> >> >> o On Unix-like systems interrupt signals now set a flag that is >> checked periodically rather than calling longjmp from the >> signal handler. This is analogous to the behavior on Windows. >> This reduces responsiveness to interrupts but prevents bugs
2019 Apr 30
2
Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
Yeah, I get that they are async. What happens is that the background process is not doing anything when the process gets a SIGINT. I.e. the background process is just listening on its standard input. AFAICT for an interactive process such a SIGINT is just swallowed, with a newline outputted to the terminal. But apparently, for this background process, it is not swallowed, and it is triggered
1998 Nov 11
1
Wavelets in R
On Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 01:00:34PM -0500, Norm Josephy wrote: > > Sir: > > I find your version of R excellent. I am teaching a course > next semester on Graphical Exploratory Data Analysis, and am > looking forward to having my students use this software. > Thank you for making it available. > ............................................................ > I am
1999 Jun 10
2
dynload for R on AIX (>= 4.2)
On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Friedrich Leisch wrote: > Yes, if I understood AIX workings correct you have to have a text file > of to-be-exported symbols at the time of linking a shared library, > i.e. the linker is called like (this is pasted from a mail by Arne) > > $(F77) -o module.so -bM:SRE -bE:module.exp -bnoentry $(OBJECTS) $(LIBDIR) $(LIBS) > > where module.exp is a text
1999 Mar 24
1
Problems with Postscript output
Hi, I have a problem with the Postscript mechanism of R: If I save figures in landscape format and try to insert them into a LaTeX document, I always have to swap the dimensions of the bounding box in line 9 of the Postscript file. Is there any reason why we can't simply swap left and bottom as well as right and top in line 435 of devPS.c? Thanks Arne
2023 Feb 11
1
scan(..., skip=1e11): infinite loop; cannot interrupt
Hello, All: I have a 4.54 GB file that I'm trying to read in chunks using "scan(..., skip=__)". It works as expected for small values of "skip" but goes into an infinite loop for "skip=1e11" and similar large values of skip: I cannot even interrupt it; I must kill R. Below please find sessionInfo() with a toy example. My real problem is a large
2011 Apr 25
3
Interrupting C++ code execution
Hello, I am writing an R interface for one of my C++ programs. The computations in C++ are very time consuming (several hours), so the user needs to be able to interrupt them. Currently, the only way I found to do so is calling R_CheckUserInterrupt() frequently. Unfortunately, there are several problems with that: 1. Calling R_CheckUserInterrupt() interrupts immediately, so I have no
2019 Apr 30
2
Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
OK, I managed to create an example without callr, but it is still somewhat cumbersome. Anyway, here it is. Terminal 1: mkfifo fif R --no-readline --slave --no-save --no-restore < fif Terminal 2: cat > fif Sys.getpid() This will make Terminal 1 print the pid of the R process, so we can send a SIGINT: Terminal 3: kill -INT pid The R process is of course still running happily. Terminal 2
2019 Apr 30
2
[External] Re: Background R session on Unix and SIGINT
Unfortunately --interactive also makes the session interactive(), which is bad for me, as it is a background session. In general, I don't want the interactive behavior, but was wondering if I could send as SIGINT to try to interrupt the computation of the background process, and if that does not work, then I would send a SIGKILL and start up another process. It all works nicely, except for
2008 Apr 14
1
clean-up actions after non-local exits
Dear R-devel, Some time ago I started a thread that boiled down to clean-up actions after non-local exits in R, see below. I wonder if there has been any progress on this? R-ext 2.6.1 doesn't say much on the subject. How, for example, do people deal with a situation where their C (C++) function opens a file and then receives a signal or longjump-s on error(), how do they make sure the
2001 Sep 28
2
2.9.9p2 bug in PAM support
With OpenSSH 2.9.9p2 as the server, I'm not able to do scp or "ssh machinename command" in general to any of my Suns! I tracked this down a bit; the problem occurs only when PAM support is enabled. However, if I remove line 430 of session.c, "do_pam_session(s->pw->pw_name, NULL);" inside of do_exec_no_pty, the problem goes away. It looks like the following entry
2024 Dec 18
2
R_CheckUserInterrupt() can be a performance bottleneck within GUIs
It seems benign, but has implications since checking time is actually not a cheap operation: adding jus ta time check alone incurs a penalty of ca. 700% compared with the time it takes to call R_CheckUserInterrupt(). Generally, it makes no sense to check interrupts at every iteration - you'll find code like if (++i % 10000 == 0) R_CheckUserInterrupt(); in loops to make sure it's not called
2016 Apr 13
3
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 at 09:38 Amaury SECHET <deadalnix at gmail.com> wrote: > I'd be happy to do it, but this is a bit much high level for me to be > actionable. Can you explain me what I should do to reintroduce them int he > debian packaging ? > On the CMake side, I'm not sure. I think it's just a matter of using the "install()" functions to install them