similar to: repeated measure in GLM

I am trying to understand better an analysis mean RT in various conditions in a within subjects design with the overall mean RT / subject as one of the factors. LME seems to be the right way to do this. using something like m<- lme(rt~ a *b *subjectRT, random= ~1|subject) and then anova(m,type = "marginal"). My understanding is that lme is an easy interface for dummy coding

Hallo! I have data of the following design: NSubj were measured at Baseline (visit 1) and at 3 following time points (visit 2, visit 3, visit 4). There is or is not a treatment. Most interesting is the question if there is a difference in treatment between the results of visit 4 and baseline. (The other time points are also of interest.) The level of significance is alpha=0.0179 (because of an

How does one go about doing a repeated measure regression? The documentation I have on it (Lorch & Myers 1990) says to use linear / (subj x linear) to get your F. However, if I put subject into glm or lm I can't get back a straight error term because it assumes (rightly) that subject is a nominal predictor of some sort. In looking at LME it seems like it just does the right thing

Hello, I am trying to fit a repeated measures linear mixed model (using lme) but I don't want to include any random effects. I'm having trouble (even after consulting Pinheiro & Bates 2000) figuring out how to specify the repeated measure without including it in the specification of a random effect. My data consist of repeated "counts" in "plots" that I wish

Dear All, A few weeks ago I posted a question to this list but unfortunately got no answer! A friend warned me of my english. Again, the problem is: A 2-level 5-factors completely randomized design was used to investigate the potential effects of those factors on a solution's characters (several response variables). Each response-variable was measured repeatedly (13 times) during a

I haven't been able to find an answer on this that's direct, only implied. In several places I have read that when people asked for sphericity tests they were guided toward lme or mlm models. But, there is no direct indication that the lme method is not subject to the sphericity assumption. In fact, it seems like it should be. Its just a linear model that handles random and

Dear all, Last autumn there was some discussion on the list of the warning Warning message: fitted probabilities numerically 0 or 1 occurred in: (if (is.empty.model(mt)) glm.fit.null else glm.fit)(x = X, y = Y, when fitting binomial GLMs with many 0 and few 1. Parts of replies: "You should be able to tell which coefficients are infinite -- the coefficients and their standard errors will

vhost_task_create is supposed to return the vhost_task or NULL on failure. This fixes it to return the correct value when the allocation of the struct fails. Fixes: 77feab3c4156 ("vhost_task: Allow vhost layer to use copy_process") # mainline only Reported-by: syzbot+6b27b2d2aba1c80cc13b at syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie at oracle.com> ---

On 3/11/23 2:53 AM, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 04:03:24PM -0600, Mike Christie wrote: >> This has us pass in the thread's name during creation in kernel_thread. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie at oracle.com> >> --- >> kernel/kthread.c | 35 ++++++++++++++--------------------- >> 1 file changed, 14

Dear subscribers, I'm trying to make the switch from M$ Windows to Linux (KDE) and found the R-cran project for statistical analysis. I'm not a genius in statistics so the command line interface is a bit hard for me. I need an analogue way to do the SPSS General Linear Model->Repeated Measures (multivariate) but I don't have a clue how to perform this in R-cran. Can maybe

The following patches were made over Linus tree. The patches fix 3 issues: 1. If a user performs LIO LUN unmapping before the endpoint has been cleared then we can end up trying to free a bogus tmf struct if the TMF is still exucuting when we do the unmap. 2. If vhost_scsi_setup_vq_cmds fails we can leave the tpg->vhost_scsi pointer set and we can end up trying to access a freed struct. 3.

The following patches were made over Linus tree and also apply over mst tree's vhost branch. The patches fix an issue where management operations like LUN mapping/unmapping and device addition hang for 30 seconds or up to N minutes depending on the device. The problem is that we use a global mutex to protect the list of tpgs but we hold that mutex during those management operations. So if you

I don't know much about GLM in general or glm in R. Can anyone tell me how to do the following (in R or some other stat system) or refer me to a textbook discussion? Two factor ANOVA repeated measures design. Each subject gives a percent correct. I am assuming the correct way to proceed is to fit a generalized linear model with binomial responses and logistic link. But I have not found a

Hello to the R world... I have some problems regarding a GLM - repeated measures analysis. I want to test overall differences between AgeClass and Treatment (between subject) with OpenR1+OpenR2+OpenR3 (repeated measures, within subject). The table looks kind like this: AgeClass Treatment OpenR1 OpenR2 OpenR3 1 1 0 0 12.63 1 1 12.67 3.83 45.67 1 1 38.46 65.38 75.21 1 1 14.46 0 17.96 1 2 27.83

Hello and thanks in advance I am running a glm in R the code is as follows with residual diagnostic code below model4<-glm(Biomass~(Treatment+Time+Site)^2, data=bobB, family=quasi(link="log", variance="mu")) par(mfrow=c(2,2)) plot(model2) to test the effect of grazing exclusion of feral horses for a Phd with following factors: Treatment - 3 levels which are grazed

This patch has the core work flush function take a worker. When we support multiple workers we can then flush each worker during device removal, stoppage, etc. Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie at oracle.com> --- drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 12:50:49PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 07:43:04AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:44:45AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 03:37:19AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 01:56:05PM -0500, Mike Christie wrote: > > >

When get_pending detects the task has been marked to be killed we try to clean up the SIGKLL by doing a sigdelset and recalc_sigpending, but we still leave it in shared_pending. If the signal is being short circuit delivered there is no need to put in shared_pending so this adds a check in complete_signal. This patch was modified from Eric Biederman <ebiederm at xmission.com> original

The following patches were built over linux-next which contains various vhost patches in mst's tree and the vhost_task patchset in Christian Brauner's tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git kernel.user_worker branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brauner/linux.git/log/?h=kernel.user_worker The latter patchset handles the review comment

On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 2:04?PM Mike Christie <michael.christie at oracle.com> wrote: > > The following patches were made over Linus's tree and apply over next. They > allow the vhost layer to use copy_process instead of using > workqueue_structs to create worker threads for VM's devices. Ok, all these patches looked fine to me from a quick scan - nothing that I reacted