similar to: Re: [S] LME - fixed effects model and missing values

Hi all, I apologize in advance for the length of this post, but I wanted to make sure I was clear. I am trying to merge two dataframes that share a number of rows (but some are unique to each data frame). Each row represents a subject in a study. The problem is that sex is coded differently in the two, including the way missing values are represented. Here is an example of the merged dataframe:

Hi all, For example,if there is ten subdirectories named sub1~sub10(each including subdirectories and files too),and file1~file10,how can I rsync only sub2 and sub 3 to the target? /---- MyFolder |---------- sub1 |---------- sub2 |---------- sub3 |---------- sub4 |---------- sub5 |---------- sub6 |---------- sub7 |---------- sub8 |---------- sub9

Yes, the arch is just as you said, something like AMD GPU, but Intel GPU don't have separate register file for 'scalar/vector'. In fact my idea of defining the register tuples was borrowed from SIRegisterInfo.td in AMD GPU. But seems that AMD GPU mainly support i32/i64 register type, while Intel GPU also support byte/short register type. So I have to start defining the registers from

Dear R helpers, I have a data frame > summary(emPat) pairE subj pattern far-near : 18 sub1 : 37 urb :123 long-short : 18 sub2 : 37 bpb : 72 supported-unsupported: 18 sub3 : 37 prp : 67 large-small : 18 sub4 : 37 brb : 64 dense-sparse : 18 sub5 : 37 unp : 62

Hi All I am fighting this for 3 days and could not find any reason it is not working the way I want to (or I the way think it should). Internet output interface = eth2 (htb qdisc) Internet input interface = imq0 (eth2 attached - htb qdisc) main class = imq0 1:1 sub1 = 1:ffff (default) sub2 = 1:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp) sub3 = 1:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )

Still Check this line from you named config. include "/etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones"; This can cause an overlap in the zones, so be carefull with that one. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Dirk Laurenz via > samba > Verzonden: woensdag 25 januari 2017 1:26 > Aan: samba at

Hi, I just started with R and I found that there are many options to rearrange the data to do mixed models. I want to use the reshape function. I have 2 between subject variables and one within. I was able to change the data structure but still - the result of the aov functions are calculating everything as a within subject. the table looks like this: SerialNo breed treatment distance_1

i will do so.... thanks Am 25.01.2017 um 08:46 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > Still > > Check this line from you named config. > > include "/etc/bind/named.conf.default-zones"; > > This can cause an overlap in the zones, so be carefull with that one. > > > Greetz, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba

Hi Escha, Great to have your comment! Do you have any specific reason for not doing like this? I am not sure whether I understand your point correctly. For "just model one thread", do you mean "only considering ONE of the 8/16 working lanes that running in lock-step way"?? For my case, may be something like I only need to define r0~r127 as register for i32 register (each r#

Hello all, My app is using LLVM JIT as a runtime engine for image analysis (similar to opencl). I'm placing values into a struct to pass byref to a series of functions. After running the createStandardModulePasses(...) set of optimizations, the function calls are all inlined but the struct store/load pairs haven't been optimized away. I've attached the code below. What I'd like to

Hello all, My app is using LLVM JIT as a runtime engine for image analysis (similar to opencl). I'm placing values into a struct to pass byref to a series of functions. After running the createStandardModulePasses(...) set of optimizations, the function calls are all inlined but the struct store/load pairs haven't been optimized away. I've attached the code below. What I'd like to

Hello, For this C code: int func(int foo, char bar) { int result = foo + bar; if (foo > bar) result += 100 - foo; else result += 221 - bar; return result; } Compiled with -O0 -g, the following IR represents the relevant parts of the if/else statement: %0 = load i32* %foo.addr, align 4, !dbg !49 %1 = load i8* %bar.addr, align 1, !dbg !49 %conv = sext

I think I'm getting a bit closer to the problem. I've found that the call to InlineSpiller::foldMemoryOperand() inside InlineSpiller::spillAroundUses() is causing the problems. As a test, I removed that call and with your yesterday's patch I'm not getting any errors at all, the code generated is the same one as with the call. This is happening when

Hai,   Seeing : > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: configured writeable > zone '168.192.in-addr.arpa' > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: zone local.laurenz.ws/NONE: has no > NS records > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone > 'local.laurenz.ws'   Normaly you should see first the local.laurenz.ws

Hi All,   For the test snippet below, int func(int dd, int ds, int *rm) {   int d_sn = 0;   int dv_sn = 0;   unsigned int d, r;   if (dd < 0) { d_sn = 1; dd = -dd; };   if (ds < 0) { dv_sn = 1; ds = -ds ; };     d = func1( dd, ds, &r);     if (d_sn && dv_sn){ r = -r;}   else if (d_sn) { d = -d; r = -r; }   else if (dv_sn) { d = -d; };     if (rm) { *rm = (signed int)r; }  

Running R 2.5.1 and a newly downloaded lme4 package on WinXP I'm trying to work my way through Everitt and Hothorn's "Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using R," c 2006. (No, it's not homework.) Chapter 10 discusses linear mixed effects models for longitudinal data. I've called my long data frame BtheB.long Here's the model from the book, which I run. lmer1 <-

There are a number of places in device_add_disk that can fail, and even more to come as we extend it. Switch the return type of the function, and return the error code when error happens. The WARN_ON is kept because callers are not updated to check the error yet. Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz at redhat.com> --- block/genhd.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------

On Wed, 08/17 10:49, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:15:06 +0800 > Fam Zheng <famz at redhat.com> wrote: > > > @@ -613,10 +614,8 @@ void device_add_disk(struct device *parent, struct gendisk *disk) > > disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_UP; > > > > retval = blk_alloc_devt(&disk->part0, &devt); > > - if (retval) { > > -

On Wed, 08/17 11:06, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:48:23 +0800 > Fam Zheng <famz at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 08/17 10:49, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 15:15:06 +0800 > > > Fam Zheng <famz at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > @@ -613,10 +614,8 @@ void device_add_disk(struct device *parent,

Is there a way to save a reference to a Basic Block that gets all fixed up in the linker, so that you can branch to it during execution? (Or maybe just a better way to do what I'm trying to do?) In my old-school BASIC compiler that I'm writing with LLVM, for each GOSUB, I keep a map of an integer ID and a pointer to the basic block following the GOSUB to return to. Then, when a BASIC