similar to: Rd problems --- followup

Hola! I have the following in a .Rd file: \eqn{\mbox{coef} = c(\mbox{coef}[1],\ldots, \mbox{coef}[n]) } {coef = c(coef[1], coef[2], \dots, coef[n])} However, both arguments come out in the latex file! Whats happening? Kjetil Halvorsen

I have constructed the function mml2 (below) based on the likelihood function described in the minimal latex I have pasted below for anyone who wants to look at it. This function finds parameter estimates for a basic Rasch (IRT) model. Using the function without the gradient, using either nlminb or optim returns the correct parameter estimates and, in the case of optim, the correct standard

I've just committed the parse_Rd() function to R-devel. This is a parser for Rd files, described in http://developer.r-project.org/parseRd.pdf It is not identical to the current parser, and about a dozen of the base man pages currently signal syntax errors. It also detected errors in 10 files that were errors according to both definitions, but were missed by the current system, and

With help by Kurt and Martin I have written a short proposal for a new R doc source format that should be easier to parse using, e.g., perl. There should be especially a clearer distinction between text and keywords. Here we go, please make comments, corrections, etc. Best, Fritz ********************************************************** Conversion: ----------- A perl module providing

Sorry for starting another topic, this is actually a reply to Segher's post on Sun Oct 22 on the 'mdct question' topic. I wasn't subscribed properly and so I didn't get email confirmation and thus can't add to that thread. So Segher, if the equation is indeed what you say it is, then replacing mdct_backward with this version should work, but it doesn't. Am I applying

I am using both nlminb and optim to get MLEs from a likelihood function I have developed. AFAIK, the model I has not been previously used in this way and so I am struggling a bit to unit test my code since I don't have another data set to compare this kind of estimation to. The likelihood I have is (in tex below) \begin{equation} \label{eqn:marginal} L(\beta) = \prod_{s=1}^N \int

'Writing R Extensions' tells you that $ needs to be escaped in Rd files outside \code and similar. So I was surprised to find that ca 80 CRAN packages have constructions like (from ISwR) \item{\code{folate}}{ a numeric vector, folate concentration ($\mu$g/l). } This does not render sensibly in non-latex conversions, and it is what we have \eqn{} for. That $ needs to be

I present you with a function that solves a problem that has bugged me for many years. I think the problem may be general enough to at least consider adding this function, or a revamped version of it, to the 'stats' package, with the other multinomial functions reside. I'm using R to export data to text files, which are input data for an external model written in C++. Parts of the

Hi, I am doing a small experiment to test if I can use MathJax ( official site: http://www.mathjax.org ) in R's html help pages (i.e. options(help_type='html')) and it seems working with some minor modifications. The screenshot (rendered by Firefox 4.0 beta and with STIX fonts) of the help page in html format with MathJax enabled is at the following url:

--xk+LtGr+JJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Attached is a conversion script for converting current R doc files to the proposed new format ... I'm not sure if it handles everything correctly, as I made just some random checks. The main purpose for posting the thing to the list is such that those interested can get a look at the new format. Of

Clarify general description of the mac, status and max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of the fields are non valid. Also clarify that validity of two status bits depends on two different feature flags. Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork at redhat.com> --- content.tex | 42

I have a package with in the documentation: in \usage : \dots in \arguments: \ldots This is how I interpreted "Use \dots for the dots in function argument lists ..., and \ldots for ellipsis dots in ordinary text" in "Writing R Extensions". When I did `R CMD check' in R version 1.3.1 all was fine. With R version 1.4.0 I get : * checking for undocumented arguments

Full_Name: Robin Hankin Version: 2.4.0 RC OS: MacOSX 10.4.7 Submission from: (NULL) (139.166.242.29) The first cut line described in Trig.Rd for asin() is incorrect in the ascii version of the manpage. The Rd file reads: For \code{asin()} and \code{acos()}, there are two cuts, both along the real axis: \eqn{\left(-\infty, -1\right]}{\(-Inf, 1\]} and Note the inconsistency between the

Surprisingly, I played around with some test code and below actually creates equations that look correct. tempmat<-matrix(10,nrow=6,ncol=6) restrictmat<-diag(6) colnames(tempmat)<-c("AUD.l1","CHF.l1","CAD.l1","GBP.l1","EUR.l1","JPY.l 1")

I've been working on a new package and I have a few questions regarding the behaviour of the nlm function. I've been (for better or worse) using the nlm function to fit a linear model without suppling the hessian or gradient attributes in the objective function. I'm curious as to why the nlm requires 31 iterations (for the linear model), and then it doesn't work when I try to add

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > > Clarify general description of the mac, status and > > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is > > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of > > the fields are non valid. > > > > Also

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:43:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 08/16/2015 09:42 PM, Victor Kaplansky wrote: > > Clarify general description of the mac, status and > > max_virtqueue_pairs fields. Specifically, the old description is > > vague about configuration layout and fields offsets when some of > > the fields are non valid. > > > > Also

Hi, I wanted to know if there existed an good implementation in R of the following classical subset Integers : $P_{n,m} = {k_1, \ldots, k_m \in \mathbb{N} : k_1 + \ldots + k_m = n }$ for any integers $m < n$. There is an obvious not optimal code which would be to run through $m$ sums and put a boolean condition to report if the integers respect these condition but it would take $m^n$

Full_Name: Ross Boylan Version: 2.2.0 OS: Linux Submission from: (NULL) (65.175.48.58) \eqn{{\bf\beta}_j}{b(j)} in my .Rd file produces this error -------------------------------------------- ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted text> $ l.7 \eqn{{\bf\beta}_j}{\bf\beta}_ jnormal-bracket5bracket-normal{b(j)} -- ! Missing $ inserted. <inserted

--=-hiYzUeWcRJ/+kx41aPIZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi, on March 10 I filed a wishlist bug report asking for the inclusion of some changes to factanal() and the associated print method. The changes were originally proposed by John Fox in 2005; they make print.factanal() display factor correlations if factanal() is called with rotation =