similar to: Installing RMySQL with MySQL-4.0.12 on Debian Linux

Hi, A question. When I run gelman.diag and gelman.plot with mcmc lists obtained from MCMCregress, the results are following. > post.R <- MCMCregress(Size~Age+Status, data = data, burnin = 5000, mcmc = 100000, + thin = 10, verbose = FALSE, beta.start = NA, sigma2.start = NA, + b0 = 0, B0 = 0, nu = 0.001, delta = 0.001) > post1.R <- MCMCregress(Size~Age+Status, data

I'm doing convolutions in the frequency domain and need to know the layout of the Fourier modes returned by fft. (This is leading up to a more involved question about moment generating functions, but I need to know if I've got this part correct first.) I think in 1D the pattern is: 0 1 2 3 -2 1 (even) 0 1 2 3 -3 2 1 (odd) In 2D is it simply (for a square matrix): 0 1 2 -1 (horizontal)

Hello, I am trying to make the switch from SAS, and I have a fairly elemental problem with syntax using the nlme package for analyzing mixed models. There was a previous question on this topic posted to this list, so I apologize for redundancy, but I didn't understand the advice given to that inquiry. The model I want to run has the following factors: Host (fixed) Sire (random) Dam

I see some code in R to attach finalizers to external pointer references (Register[C]Finalizer). Anyone have an example of how to code the finalizer? R_RegisterCFinalizer accepts a C function, but I can't see how to get it to operate on the pointer, since the pointer is not passed to the function when its called. RegisterFinalizer takes an R closure, but how is it called from R (tried

Hi Everyone, I posted a similar question about a week ago, but haven't gotten any replies -- I'm afraid that's because my previous question was too vague. Let me try again with a more specific question, and I hope someone can help. NOTE, I know I should be using the newer lme4 package, I just haven't had a chance to update my version of R yet, so the question below relates

I seem to remember something about an "internal" keyword for R doc files. How do we use it? Tim -- Timothy H. Keitt Department of Ecology and Evolution State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794 USA Phone: 631-632-1101, FAX: 631-632-7626 http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ee/keitt/ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

Its not clear from the documentation whether one should do \keyword[key1, key2} or \keyword{key1} \keyword{key2} in .Rd files. I believe the latter is correct. (At least 'R CMD check' complains when given the first version.) It would help to make this explicit in the R extension writing docs. Tim -- Timothy H. Keitt Department of Ecology and Evolution State University of New

I'm curious if any of the core R developers have considered the possibility of hosting R (v2?) on the parrot common runtime environment. Perl6 will generate byte-code for parrot, as will some future version of python. I can imagine both drawbacks and advantages. Some advantages would be fast byte-code execution and freely mixing perl, python and R modules. Anyone looked into this? Tim

I have an application where I need to preserve object attributes across calls to 'lapply'. The current definition is: lapply <- function (X, FUN, ...) { FUN <- match.fun(FUN) if (!is.list(X)) X <- as.list(X) rval <- .Internal(lapply(X, FUN)) names(rval) <- names(X) return(rval) } Would it make sense to replace names(rval) <- names(X)

Can a C function wrapped with .Call return void? Or must it return a valid SEXP? Thnx. Tim -- Timothy H. Keitt Department of Ecology and Evolution State University of New York at Stony Brook Stony Brook, New York 11794 USA Phone: 631-632-1101, FAX: 631-632-7626 http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/ee/keitt/ -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-devel mailing

Thanks for your reply. Yes, I was about to recurse over the use list of the argument in the called function. I did not want to pursue that because with this solution, I am going to implement the interprocedural part myself and was wondering if that was not already done. I was not also 100% sure that this will work for any type of arguments. If, based on your response, this is my only solution

Hello, I have been using the USE class to access the use-def chains of different values. However, what I have noticed is that the set of users of a particular value is limited for the appearance of that variable in the current function. How can I get the interprocedural use of a particular value? For example, if a variable *a* is used as an argument in a function call *foo*, the USE analysis

Based on the stepAIC help, I have assumed that it only was for lm, aov, and glm models. I gather from the following correspondence that it also works with lme models. Thomas Lumley 07:40 a.m. 28/04/03 -0700 4 Re: [R] stepAIC/lme problem (1.7.0 only) Prof Brian Ripley 04:19 p.m. 28/04/03 +0100 6 Re: [R] stepAIC/lme problem (1.7.0 only) Prof Brian Ripley 06:09 p.m. 29/04/03 +0100 6 Re: [R]

Hi, I am first year PhD student at Stony Brook University. For one of my projects I am trying to JIT compile and run a C program containing inline assembly using MCJIT but I am not able to. I have cloned and build LLVM-3.1. Below are more details. Arch : x86 OS : Linux ubuntu 2.6.35-22-generic Sample program : test_inline_asm.c ------------------- #include <stdio.h> int main(){ int

I'm revisiting the R/S DBI package and was wondering if there is any plan to implement package name spaces in R/S. I've taken to the habit of prepending a few characters to function names in packages to avoid collisions, e.g., dbConnect(). An alternative would be DBI::connect() (s/::/preferred/) which in some ways I find more pleasing. Not having thought about it in detail, it seems pretty

Hi Amit, You're not doing anything wrong. This is an error in 'lli' not properly initializing the native target libraries. Fixed in SVN trunk r167392. -Jim On Nov 4, 2012, at 4:09 PM, Amit Arya <aarya at cs.stonybrook.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > I am first year PhD student at Stony Brook University. For one of my projects I am trying to JIT compile and run a C program

Hi Jim, Thanks for the reply. I was able to figure out the problem in 'lli'. InitializeNativeTargetAsmParser() was missing in lli. I should have replied back saying that the problem was resolved. Hope I didn't waste your time. Regards, Amit ________________________________ From: Jim Grosbach [grosbach at apple.com] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2012 2:07 PM To: Amit Arya Cc: LLVM

Hi, I am using the LLVM JIT infrastructure (MCJIT). I wanted to see if there are any performance gains as the compiler can detect the target CPU at runtime. But, I didn't see any improvement (I compile with -no-mmx and -no-sse). I then tried an experiment, where I compiled the program with clang-3.3, with and without specifying the target cpu as "corei7". I was shocked to see that

2012/8/25 Iaroslav Markov <ymarkov at cs.stonybrook.edu>: > Can't you do it by performing some analysis on CFG? You can traverse that structure with BFS. And after that for all the BB you have visited more than once, you try to find a parent that has a branch instruction as a terminator. Additionally you ensure that there are no BB with branches as terminators on your way. If such

Thanks Arpith for this pointer but it did not contain what I was looking for. However, I solved my issue by finding that the BitCastInst used when outlining OpenMP parallel region offers a method for retrieving the original value within the bitcast via stripPointerCasts(). So what I did to retrieve omp_outlined..45 is: //bitcast is the third argument of __kmpc_fork_call Value *vcall =