similar to: Rebuilding $HOME/.R/help.db

Is there an easy way to do a linear model with an a priori known slope? In essence, I want to minimize the residuals around a line of known slope. -R -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the

I'm interfacing to C code that uses 1-based indexing on arrays -- it ignores the zeroth element. Thus, input vectors from R must be moved up one, and output arrays must be moved down one. What is the best way to deal with this using R internal code? My current approach is: For an input R vector of length n, allocate a new vector(v) of length n+1 and copy input into v[1] to v[1+n]. Call

I am running centos-3 and have a question about rebuilding errata srpms from redhat. Do all i have to do is run rpmbuild --rebuild filename.src.rpm to rebuild the rpm for use on my centos system? I am talking about the src.rpms that dont have a a filename change for example the rpm file name change for kernels, etc that add c0 to the rpm filename I am assuming that if the src.rpm filename

We just upgraded Cent from 5.3 to 5.5 on a bunch of servers with little to no issues (kudos to you guys) except on a few servers where it appears we are having a problem w/ the Tomcat upgrade. Previously our application server was working fine under 5.3 with Tomcat/Java installed as such: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-1.4.2.0-40jpp.115 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.30.b09.el5

Hello, As discussed on the centos-users list, I would like to create some pages on the CentOS Wiki with instructions on how to set up your environment to build RPMs and how to rebuild RPMs. This content today exists here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source#head-a8dae925eec15786df9f6f8c918eff16bf67be0d I would suggest creating these two: 1)

I am trying to install the Cluster RPMS from rpm.karan.org. But since I have updated my kernel with yum, I have the wrong kernel for a couple of the packages. # rpm -i --test cman-kernel-smp-2.6.9-36.0.i686.rpm error: Failed dependencies: /lib/modules/2.6.9-11.ELsmp is needed by cman-kernel-smp-2.6.9-36.0.i686 kernel-smp = 2.6.9-11.EL is needed by cman-kernel-smp-2.6.9-36.0.i686

We've had some catastrophic filesystem failures that have left us with corrupted databases with empty files and no backup for about 15TB of our data. Recreating the 15TB from source data backups is possible but will take a very very long time. I'm hoping that, given all of the .DB files are still intact, there my be some way to extract their contents and rebuild the other tables. This

Hi, Looking at the source, it doesn't seem like fts-solr checks for settings changes using fts_index_have_compatible_settings() like fts-lucene does. Is there any special reason for why fts-solr shouldn't also rebuild indexes if settings has changed? /Peter

Hi; Since I decided to "yum remove openssl", genius that I am (not!), I managed to screw up the OS so badly the server co. had to rebuild it for me <:-) These good people backed everything up very well, so the damage was minimal. Now I'm trying to rebuild MySQL. I did the "yum install mysql" no problem. However... [root at 13gems old]# /etc/init.d/mysqld start -bash:

HI all, Somebody had tried to do a rebuild of RedHat Storage Server 2.0 and RHEV 3.2 hypervisor with CentOS? Mock is an option to accomplish this? Thanks.

Sorry to post twice in a row, but I also wanted help with my index rebuild process - I seem to be getting timeouts when I run the rebuild_index.rb script, like this: /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-1.14.2/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract_adapter.rb:120:in `log'': Mysql::Error: Lost connection to MySQL server during query: SELECT * FROM search_queries

We don't currently detect if a file with an old timestamp has been moved into a directory. This fixes that. --- lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Config.pm | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Config.pm b/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Config.pm index 3fff455..bb30dae 100644 --- a/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Config.pm +++ b/lib/Sys/VirtV2V/Config.pm @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@

Hi, I'm attempting to rebuild CentOS 2.1 ISOs with the latest kernel (to attempt installation on some newer hardware with SATA drives). It seems that the original build environment used different version of anaconda than shipped with CentOS 2.1 (7.2-77_ELAS vs 7.2.32AS). I found SRPM of 7.2.32AS, however I'm wondering if there is binary package also? BTW, any hints on the

Hello- With a database filled with several customers'' datasets, I thought it would be a nice feature of my app''s backend interface to be able to extract (and optionally delete) the data from a single customer. It would then also be nice to rebuild that data from the stored info. What''s a good way to do this efficiently? If all the ":dependent => true"

Hi, One of our applications has some very specific requirements regarding PHP, so I had to rebuild it to add some functionality that's not included in the default configuration. First thing I removed every PHP-related package that was installed on the system: # yum remove `rpm -qa | grep php` Then I downloaded the PHP SRPM from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5.1/os/SRPMS/ and

Hi all: I'm trying to rebuild the anaconda installer for Centos 4.0 (i386) to add some RPMs and do some other things, and I've run into a problem. I've done lots of anaconda rebuilds for Tao Linux 1.0, and I'm bringing those bits forward into Centos 4.0. The all-knowing web hasn't turned up anything useful. It looks like the PXE-loaded kernel unpacked and mounted the

hello, I started with ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/SRPMS/firefox-2.0.0.16-1.fc8.src.rpm with the hope of rebuilding it for el5/centos. All of the dependencies were available (mostly from rpmforge) except one: something called system-bookmarks. I elected to comment out this from the spec, firefox.spec I did the extracts with CPIO rpm2cpio firefox-xxx.src.rpm |

Chris Lattner wrote: > Patches welcome. Please send a patch, or even just some suggested > text, and we'll be happy to include it. Remember that the people who > usually end up writing the FAQ's already know all the answers, so it's > hard for us to see things from fresh perspectives sometimes :) > > -Chris > Actually, my request for more info in the

HI, I'm currently using rsync version 2.4.4 protocol version 24 on a HP11.0, Solaris 8 and Redhat 7.1 platforms. In my earlier posting, I asked about the problem on "Value too large to be stored in data type" when transferring files which are >= 2GB in size., i.e. building file list ... global/FCSI/WP_RLS05/rundir/wp_celtic_max_fullwarn.tcl.log: Value too large to be stored in

I would like to rebuild glibc specifically with the -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs to allow better performance with Xen. I'm using Centos 4.2 x86_64 on an Athlon 3200+. I'm using the 2.6.9-11.106.unsupported kernel for reiser support. My thought was to download and install the SRPM and then rpmbuild with no changes to make sure it works before adding the above flag. Unfortunately, the