similar to: data.frame merge matching several columns

Hello, I am having a problem where code that plots lines using a different data frame plots bars with the current data frame (I am intended to plot lines). The code specifies lines (see below), so I can't figure out why the results are bars. I suspect that it may have something to do with the fact that in the data frame where the code worked as intended, the both variables specifying

I could do this in various hacky ways, but what's the right way? I have a nice application of the by function, which does what I want. The output looks like this: > auc_stress lab.samples.stress$subid: 2 cortisol amylase 1 919.05 6834.8 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello! I want to calculate the intra- and interrater reliability of my study. The design is very simple, 5 raters rated a diagnostic score 3 times for 19 patients. Are there methods/funtions in R? I only found packages to calculate interrater variability and intraclass correlation coefficients for matrices of n*m (n subjects, m raters) - I have n subjects, m raters and r repetitions. Can

I have another question about drawing samples from a data frame. This might sound really tricky. Let me use a data frame I have posted earlier as an example: SubID CSE1 CSE2 CSE3 CSE4 WSE1 WSE2 WSE3 WSE4 1 6 5 6 2 6 2 2 4 2 6 4 7 2 6 6 2 3 3 5 5 5 5

It sounds as thought you are interested in Hoyt's Anova which is a form of generalizability theory. This is usually estimated using by getting the variance components from ANOVA. > -----Original Message----- > From: r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch > [mailto:r-help-bounces at stat.math.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Karl Knoblick > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 6:10 AM > To: r-help at

I was running a sampling syntax based on a data frame (ago) of 160 rows and 25 columns. Below are the column names: > names(ago) [1] "SubID" "AGR1" "AGR2" "AGR3" "AGR4" "AGR5" "AGR6" "AGR7" "AGR8" [10] "AGR9" "AGR10" "WAGR1" "WAGR2"

Hi all, I have a large dataset that has >10k entries. The dataset is stored in a dataframe with the headers: SubID Condition1 Condition2 Result1 Result2 There are multiple entries for a given SubID(Subject ID). Condition 1 has 3 levels and condition2 has 2 levels (therefore there are 6 possible combinations all together e.g. Cond1 Level1 x Cond2 Level 1 etc.) and i need to compute for 1. The

Karl, If you use one of the specialized packages to calculate your ICC, make sure that you know what you're getting. (I haven't checked the packages out myself, so I don't know either.) You might want to read David Futrell's article in the May 1995 issue of Quality Progress where he describes six different ways to calculate ICCs from the same data set, all with different

Dear R-users, I have written the following code to generate some trellis plots. It works perfectly fine except that it is quite slow when it is apply to my typical datasets (over several thousands of lines). I believe the problem comes from the loops I am using to subset my data.frame. I read in the archives that the tapply function is often more efficient than a loop in R. Unfortunately ,

Hi, I''m looking for a star rating component for RoR, a bit like Votio (http://redalt.com/downloads/ - find the votio heading) or the star rating used on Amazon. I don''t really need the AJAX capabilities, just the ability to bind the results to a hidden drop down, or radio inputs. Multiple raters per page is also an issue. Any recomendations? -- Posted via

I have a really simple question I have a data frame of 8 variables (the first column is the subjects' id): SubID G1 G2 G3 G4 W1 W2 W3 W4 1 6 5 6 2 6 2 2 4 2 6 4 7 2 6 6 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5

Hello, I have a survey in which a number of people rated a set of items on a 1..5 scale. I believe it would be desirable to argue that the people's responses are correlated, and thus that the rating task makes sense to people. Is there a standard approach to this? With only 2 people, the correlation coefficient between their responses would be an interpretable number, (though probably

Hey, I am hoping someone can help me with a sampling question. I have a data frame of 8 variables (the first column is the subjects' id): SubID CSE1 CSE2 CSE3 CSE4 WSE1 WSE2 WSE3 WSE4 1 6 5 6 2 6 2 2 4 2 6 4 7 2 6 6 2 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 5

It is just me or is the entire Wine AppDB screwed up? Why is it that people complain when no-cd fixes are used when a programs is rated platinum, yet when you need to set and use native dll's it's okay? It's either one or the other, for example why is MS Office 2007 rated platinum for? You need native dll's and not wines versions to run it, yet in games that use secu-rom or other

Hi, You may try: dat1 <- structure(list(SubID = 1:8, CSE1 = c(6L, 6L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 5L, 3L, 3L), CSE2 = c(5L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 6L, 6L), CSE3 = c(6L, 7L, 5L, 3L, 7L, 3L, 6L, 6L), CSE4 = c(2L, 2L, 5L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 3L, 3L), WSE1 = c(6L, 6L, 5L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 6L, 6L), WSE2 = c(2L, 6L, 5L, 4L, 4L, 3L, 5L, 5L), WSE3 = c(2L, 2L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 7L, 2L, 4L), WSE4 = c(4L, 3L, 5L, 2L, 1L, 3L, 1L, 7L)),

Hi, May be this helps: funcName<- function(df1, x){ ?whatCol=df1[[x]] ?print("Got it") ?print(whatCol) ?} ? funcName(df,"ColA") #[1] "Got it" #[1] 1 2 3 4 5 ? funcName(df,"ColB") #[1] "Got it" #[1] A B C D E #Levels: A B C D E A.K. >I am trying to extract the 2nd column from a dataframe using a function called funcName. Note this is an

Hi all, I have an experiment where 5 raters assessed the quality of 24 web sites. (each rater rated each site once). I want to come up with a measure of reliability of the ratings for the web sites ie to what extent does each rater give the same (or similar) rating to each web site. My idea was to fit a random effects model using lme and from that, calculate the intraclass correlation as a

Hi All, I am using fleiss kappa for inter rater agreement. Are there any know issues with Fleiss kappa calculation in R? Even when I supply mock data with total agreement among the raters I do not get a kappa value of 1. instead I am getting negative values. I am using the irr package version 0.70 Any help is much appreciated. Thanks and Regards M [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi All: Could anyone point me to a package that can calculate stratified kappa? My design is like this, 4 raters, 30 types of diagnosis scores, 20 patients. Each rater will rate each patient for each type of diagnosis score. The rater's value is nominal. I know I can measure the agreement between raters for each type of diagnosis score, e.g., calculate out 30 kappa values. My problem is I

dear all, I want to make a dotplot with ratings from Items in 6 ItemsGroups. I reordered the items by rating within each group. I plotted the items by rating conditional on ItemGroup. The ordering works as I wanted but my y-aches labels (items) within each ItemGroup are now unequally spaced, e.g., in some panels there is a gap between one lower rated item and the next higher, to give a picture