similar to: base conversion, digit interweaving

I have two datasets, the first has this shape (each word is a column) Name address phone .. .. The second one has the following shape Name request I need a contingency table with for example phone and request. The people registered in these datasets are present in both datasets, BUT in the first every record is a person, so every person is counted once and is 1 row, in the second every row is

Hi, how do I interweave 2 columns of data into a single column? See illustration below. Thx-jenny I have 2 columns of data Col1 Col21 2 3 45 6 7 89 10 I want to create a new column with interlocking cell centries12345678910 Get the new Windows Live Messenger! Try it! _________________________________________________________________ Did you know you

From: Carsten Otte <cotte at de.ibm.com> From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> This patch introduces in-kernel handling of some intercepts for privileged instructions: handle_set_prefix() sets the prefix register of the local cpu handle_store_prefix() stores the content of the prefix register to memory handle_store_cpu_address() stores the cpu number of

> In any case when you > want to obtain a base pointer to a "derived" object (where derivation > is implemented as you showed - with nesting) it's simply a matter of > using getelementptr to obtain a pointer to the nested base object and > using that. Umm ok, but i've the strange feeling that i'm missing something.. First a simple question: getelementptr with

On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 09:24 +0200, Nicola Lugato wrote: > > In any case when you > > want to obtain a base pointer to a "derived" object (where derivation > > is implemented as you showed - with nesting) it's simply a matter of > > using getelementptr to obtain a pointer to the nested base object and > > using that. > > Umm ok, but i've the

Actually doing both sounds good to me. Can you explain further about ringing them all at once? Here is how I tried to make mine work and failed... {global} PHONES0=SIP/2000 PHONES1=SIP/2001 [local] exten => 6001,1,Dial(${PHONES0&PHONES1),20,trf) When I dial 6001 I see my debugger tell me that I am using the wrong syntax. Do you know the correct syntax for ringing them all at once? I

Dear developers, the implementation of S4 generics for existing S3 ones in the base package is concerned to be a threat to quick startup times [1]. But since S4 is promoted, and S3/S4 interoperability a pain when package developing [2], are there efforts to improve the situation? E.g. an S3 free system, etc. A good thing [2] is the package 'stats4', including some setGeneric calls (e.g.

hi all - i'm trying to 'R CMD build' a package, but i have what appears to be a bootstrapping problem: i've included a vignette in my package, with R code interwoven (and built using Sweave), but in this documentation i have a code line: > library(MyPackage) now, when trying to build a .tar.gz install-able version of my package in a clean state, i remove the original

I once used smbclient (or something in the smb suite) to send a command to windows and reset my windows password. I can't recall how I did it though (over a year ago). What I would really like to do is use smb to send a command to a windows machine that would run a script (shutting down Interwoven) and then back up all the Interwoven files using rsync. The RSYNC portion is easy since I

Dear all, I would like to (i) produce boxplot graphs with axis in logarithm in base 10 and (ii) showing the values on the axis in 10^exponent format rather than 10E+exponent. To illustrate with an example, I have some widely spread data that I chart plot using boxplot() [figure on the left]; the log="y" option of boxplot() I obtained the natural logarithm conversion of the data and

Hi, I am generating following code: %base = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.CallInfo* %6, i32 0, i32 4, i32 0 %7 = load %ravi.TValue** %base %8 = bitcast %ravi.TValue* %7 to i8* %9 = bitcast %ravi.TValue* %5 to i8* call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %8, i8* %9, i32 16, i32 8, i1 false) %10 = load %ravi.CallInfo** %L_ci %base1 = getelementptr inbounds %ravi.CallInfo* %10, i32 0,

That could be it. What I want to do is set a group of callers and have the event cause the phone to ring them in order. I will tie it to my IVR portion and thus I can make sure peole in sales get calls based on our hierarchy in the office. So if I am reading your example right the syntax is.... Exten => 501,1,Dial(SIP/PHONE1&SIP/PHONE2&SIP/PHONE3), rtf) Is that a valid way to cause

Ancient inline assembler that manipulates descriptor tables is unreadable and has no type checking. Doing this in C actually generates better code, saves code space, and improves readability. The fact that you must cast descriptors to (char *) for the inline assembler to work properly caused me no end of grief working on these patches. Note that GCC does not generate rotations to utilize

Ancient inline assembler that manipulates descriptor tables is unreadable and has no type checking. Doing this in C actually generates better code, saves code space, and improves readability. The fact that you must cast descriptors to (char *) for the inline assembler to work properly caused me no end of grief working on these patches. Note that GCC does not generate rotations to utilize

Samba: Version 2.2.3a-12 for Debian We use the Interwoven TeamSite CMS software here, and in all our environments from development through production, access files on the SMB share provided by TeamSite. Most of our development machines are Windows 2000/XP systems, but some are Linux, and all our other environments are purely Linux. The Linux machines all mount the share with smbfs. Under

From: Carsten Otte <cotte at de.ibm.com> This patch contains the s390 interrupt subsystem (similar to in kernel apic) including timer interrupts (similar to in-kernel-pit) and enabled wait (similar to in kernel hlt). In order to achieve that, this patch also introduces intercept handling for instruction intercepts, and it implements load control instructions. This patch introduces an

By Andi Kleen's suggestion, this patch removes pack_ldt() and pack_tss() wrappers in favour of a general wrapper. It saves us an ifdef and some lines of code, but more importantly, it's more elegant. No functional change is made. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> --- include/asm-x86/desc.h | 55 ++++++++++++++--------------------------------- 1 files

By Andi Kleen's suggestion, this patch removes pack_ldt() and pack_tss() wrappers in favour of a general wrapper. It saves us an ifdef and some lines of code, but more importantly, it's more elegant. No functional change is made. Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> --- include/asm-x86/desc.h | 55 ++++++++++++++--------------------------------- 1 files

# Why does expressing one function require(ctest) t.test # return only function (x, ...) UseMethod("t.test") <environment: namespace:ctest> # but expressing another function shapiro.test # returns more complete code? function (x) { DNAME <- deparse(substitute(x)) x <- sort(x[complete.cases(x)]) n <- length(x) if (n < 3 || n > 5000)

plain text document attachment (xx-paravirt-desc-header.patch) Update the descriptors for an interface with paravirt ops Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt srostedt@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com> Index: clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/desc.h =================================================================== ---